Channel
@nanammhy08
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
665subscribers
+81 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003940049342 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nanammhy08 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 16 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nanammhy08 |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 665 | -1,421 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 2,086 | +20 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:39 | 2,066 | +7 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:21 | 2,059 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:45 | 2,057 | +70 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 1,987 | +1,403 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 584 | no change |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 584 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (16 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 783 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📖杭州大学专用报告📖 https://telegram.me/hz_dx 【课程评价】：#超级好评 【老师花名】：娜娜 可双飞 【联系方式】：@xnana08 【课时费用】：13pp 【老师类型】：#嫩妹 【验证留名】：咯么么 【验证时间】：2026年8月28 【课室位置】：＃西湖区 【课程服务】:以实际为准，若无则删除对应小项 ▪️事前陪浴 ▪️舌吻【我不喜欢🐍没有问】 ▪️事后陪浴 新人嫩妹服务，你懂的，自己想要可以沟通开发 【人照相似】：9分基本一致 【身高体重】：165cm/55kg 【肤色罩杯】：D 【纹身数量】：1 【课室卫生】：整体环境整洁/无一次性拖鞋/有无一次性浴巾 【个人卫生】：不抽烟/无准备漱口水/无一次性牙刷 【服务态度】：无鸽子/无罚站/无下菜/无催钟 【详情反馈】： #老师缺点 手臂有纹身，但是是卡通纹身，我觉得还可以 #老师优点 皮肤很白嫩，属于冷白皮 #情绪价值 情绪价值到位，放的开，全程哥哥叫的…
娜娜秘密花园（可双飞） pinned a photo
🎰 【杭州大学】认证教师·娜娜 @xnana08 上榜福利 📮 抽奖条件: 🎫 加入-娜娜秘密花园（可双飞） 🎫 加入-【杭州大学】新人老师榜单 🎫 加入-杭州大学 🎟️ 要求活动期间群内发言数 1 🎁 奖品内容: 娜娜 @xnana08 1p半价优惠券 × 1 娜娜 @xnana08 200优惠券 × 1 💡 活动说明: 开奖前请勿退出频道与群组，以免机器人开奖时无法统计。 开奖后，口令红包找老师兑奖。优惠券不可转让，有效期五天。 📅 开奖日期:(UTC+8) 2026年09月02日 18时00分00秒
我想我长大了，以前打屁股会哭，现在打屁股会湿💋
晚上还有空位哦，哥哥可以约💋
开课啦，哥哥可以预约了💋💋💋
想做幸福的女人，天天湿的都是床单而不是枕头😕😕
双飞还有🈳，哥哥可以预约哦👅
开课啦，哥哥可以约课了💋💋💋
开课啦，哥哥可约课💋💋💋
杭州深情颜选区专用报告模板: https://t.me/hangzhou_000 【验证留名】：xiaoma831 【验证时间】：8月21日 【老师艺名】：#娜娜 【老师ID】：@xnana08 【修车费用】：竞拍400p 【服务项目】：✅舌吻✅69 【身高身材】： 老师挺高的，穿鞋有1米7了，有点小bbw，身上有一点纹身，胸大而且软，手感很好。 【颜值相似】：人照9分，化妆后差不多就是这样，看久了觉得老师还挺漂亮的 【卫生环境】：科室是公寓，老师有提供一次性浴巾和漱口水 【整体评价】：😍超级好评 【推荐程度】：原价推荐 【上课过程】：之前就出击过老师，觉得不错，离我又近，然后又幸运中了老师的竞拍，心里不知道有多开心。奈何刚好这几天有事，老师也很大气的答应我可以后面约时间。现在老师口碑也做起来了，有时候也会比较忙。最终约好今天出击，在老师指引下，轻车熟路的上了门。 进了门，老师花了个淡淡的妆，有段时间不见，真的感觉老师又变漂…
❤1
📖杭州大学专用报告📖 https://telegram.me/hz_dx 【课程评价】：#好评 【老师花名】：#娜娜 【联系方式】：@xnana08 【课时费用】：竞拍半价p 【老师类型】：#嫩妹 #bbw 【验证留名】：Roland 【验证时间】：8月17日 【课室位置】：#古荡 【课程服务】: ▪️事前陪浴 ▪️舌吻 ▪️69互舔 ▪️事后陪浴 【人照相似】：人照9分，真人脸有点方，但因为有肉，倒是有点大号娃娃脸的感觉，和照片韵味对得上 【身高体重】：身高165左右，感觉是萍果型身材，算是bbw，腿倒不是特别粗，但确实略有小肚； 【肤色罩杯】：胸c，偏笋形，底不算太大，粉头小偏褐，柔软；户型蝴蝶，外阴唇较大，外褐内粉，紧度一般，水很多； 皮肤挺白，手感 还不错 【纹身数量】：左臂和胸口纹身 【课室卫生】：属于小区的一部分，但其实是公寓，停车方便，房间干净整洁； 【个人卫生】：没见抽烟，有漱口水和一次性浴巾，前后均陪浴清洗 …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nanammhy08. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“娜娜秘密花园（可双飞）” (@nanammhy08), 665 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nanammhy08.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.