Channel
@namjin_rj7
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,048subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001964401282 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @namjin_rj7 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/namjin_rj7 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 1,048 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 1,053 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 1,056 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 1,058 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:39 | 1,061 | no change |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 1,061 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
574 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 143 | 24.9% | |
| 🤣 | 127 | 22.1% | |
| 💔 | 124 | 21.6% | |
| 😭 | 101 | 17.6% | |
| 😢 | 33 | 5.75% | |
| 💅 | 32 | 5.57% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 2.09% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 0.348% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 574 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
★ اول که وارد لینک شدین جیهوپ و انتخاب کنین و اون پایین تصویر لینک و از هرطریق که میتونین شیر کنین که راحتـترین همون تلگرامـه! اینجوری رأیـاتون دوبرابر حساب میشه! بعدش روی ♡ 𝗏𝗈𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗐 انگشتـتونو نگه دارین! تا رأیـتون ثبت بشه! و تمام.. میتونین توی کامنتـا شات ثبت رأیـتونو بفرستین که هر یکساعت یادآوری شه
👍13
اعلامیه | طوفان توییت امروز، ۸ مرداد \ ۳۰ جولای؛ همهگی در ساعت ۱۴:۰۰ الی ۲۳:۰۰ شروع به توییت زدن در جهت لغو اعدام فرزندان ایران میکنیم. ۱۴:۰۰ – ۱۵:۰۰: یاسین کبدانی ۱۵:۰۰ – ۱۶:۰۰: آروین خیر خواه ۱۶:۰۰ – ۱۷:۰۰: محمد زیغمی ۱۷:۰۰ – ۱۸:۰۰: سروش کرمی ۱۸:۰۰ – ۱۹:۰۰: ماهان رحمتی ۱۹:۰۰ – ۲۰:۰۰: احسان فریدی ۲۰:۰۰ – ۲۱:۰۰: آرتین سالاری ۲۱:۰۰ – ۲۲:۰۰: آرمین نور محمدی ۲۲:۰۰ – ۲۳:۰۰: احمدرضا افشاری نژاد اگر به هر دلیلی …
👍11🤣3💅1
نسخه با ادبانه اش 😂✋🏻🤚🏻
🤣24
این واقعاً یکی از بزرگترین حرکتها در تاریخ صنعت موسیقی هست اونم تو زمونهای که بیشتر افراد دنبال قدرت و شهرت هستن. این فقط یه "طعنه" به گرمی به خاطر نژادپرستی نیست؛ این یه حرکت بزرگ و جسورانه علیه این جوایز و عملا نابود کردنش هست. ما همیشه بهتون افتخار میکنیم پسرا. 💜 گرمی هیچوقا لیاقتتون رو نداشت.
👍30❤4
این تصمیم فقط یه شاشیدن ساده نیس رسما ریدن به سر در سالنی که گرمی توش برگزار میشه نژادپرستای ک...کش 🥰💅
🤣26❤3💅3
بنگتن بازم اسپویل داد و ما نفهمیدیم 😞 !!
🤣40❤3
چه ترک میزنن از چنل 😂 نمیدونم از ترسشونه یا عرزشی ان
🤣32👍1💅1
این اوضاع فقط یه جور میشه تغییر کنه هممونم میدونم چطور ترامپ جاکش و ناتانیاهو مادر به خطا هم میدونن چطور ولی نمیدونم دارن چیکار میکنن ، به هر حال ریدم تو هر چی سیاست و سیاستمداره .
👍24💅1
با توییت شاید بشه کمکی کرد ولی برای این قضیه تو این کشور با آخوندای دوزاری فقط ناتانیاهو و ترامپ امشب باید یه حرکتی برا ته مونده های نظام بزنن بلکه سرگرم اونا بشن فعلا دس بکشن
😢19💅1
ایمیل زدن به ارگان های بینالمللی حقوق بشر برای جلوگیری از اعدام ها ایمیل زدن به اعضای پارلمانهای کشورهای مختلف برای درخواست کفیل یا حامی سیاسی نکات امنیتی که بهتره رعایت کنید لینک دانلود توییتر چطور توی توییتر صدای افرادی که بازداشت شدن یا در خطر اعدام هستن باشیم؟ ❗️لیست اسامی بازداشتشدگان اعتراضات ۱۴۰۴❗️ خبرگزاریها، فعالین حقوق بشر، رسانههای بینالمللی و خبرنگاران و.. که میتونید زیر توییتها منشن کنید
💅3❤1
🛑امشب ساعت 22:00 شروع به هشتگ زدن میکنیم بهترین راه برای ترند شدن هشتگها اینه که تو یه تایم مشخصی همه باهم هشتگ بزنند. این خبر رو به هر نحوی و در هر فضا و اپلیکیشنی همه جا پخش کنید همه برای اون ساعت آنلاین باشند.
💅4
این 💅 واکنش الان چه معنی داره ؟ مینازی به این کصکش بازیای حکومتت ؟ کاش میتونستم آیدیتو پیدا کنم حروم زاده
👍31💅4💔4
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @namjin_rj7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“namjin_rj7” (@namjin_rj7), 1,048 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/namjin_rj7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.