Channel
@naivety_and_text
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
24subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002348550585 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @naivety_and_text |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/naivety_and_text |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 24 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 23 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 23 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 7 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
30 reactions across 11 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🕊 | 11 | 36.7% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 10.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2025 to 1 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Франкештейн На неолурке есть статья “Никто не смотрит Шекспира” про явление, когда люди знают содержание произведений классиков (писателей, драматургов, режиссеров) и цитаты оттуда, но… не смотрят и не читают их. Зря. Чтение забытой классики зачастую открывает ее новую грань. Читая Мэри Шелли “Франкенштейн”, я для себя нашел целый бриллиант. Первое и самое очевидное открытие – Виктор Франкешнштейн не использовал т…
🌚1🔥1
Signed No Name
Попробую писать, но не знаю, когда начну. Может, в ближайшие дни даже.
Signed No Name
К сожалению, пишу мало даже в этом канале, не говоря, собственно про занятия творчеством. Работа, бытовуха (ухаживаю за пожилым родственником), иные хлопоты затянули. Что я могу сказать. Во-первых, как-то упустил тему создания всяких утерянных файлов типа "Магнитошахтинской области" C 2015 года хотел таким заняться. Да и тема нейрослопа мимо прошла. Во-вторых, многие темы, что тревожили, уже кем-то расписаны, опис…
Signed No Name
Photo, posted without a caption
🐳1👻1😁1😢1😭1
Signed No Name
Посмотрел нашумевший хоррор Орудия. Если бы я был дурачком типа Холмогорова, то написал бы тут простыню про “консервативный поворот”. Но суть фильма в ином: не надо доверять странным дальним родственникам. Фильму поставил семерку, но это субъективно. Объективно же “Орудия” - лучший хоррор из всех ужастиков, что снимали в последние пару лет. И редкий пример хоррора, где страх, смех и трагедия сплетены воедино. Если…
❤1👍1
Signed No Name
Сходил в кино на Дракулу от Люка Бессона. Что могу сказать. Дракула Брэма Стокера развивал традиции готического романа. Люк Бессон сделал экранизацию, перенеся эту историю не только на землю Франции, но и в традицию французского декаданса. Отвратительно поставлены батальные сцены. Я не Клим Саныч, который выискивает неправильные формы гульфиков, и считаю, что режиссер имеет право принести достоверность в жертву зр…
❤3
Signed No Name
В другом не было ничего, кроме полупрозрачного саркофага с жидкостью. «Не бойся, это не мой, это для тех, кто пришел из Нижнего космоса» — со смехом заметил Друг Детства. #в_поисках_детства
🕊2
Signed No Name
Сперва Друг детства проявлялся в отражениях в шкафу: в отполированном дереве советской мебели возникла высокая фигура с многоугольником вместо головы и длинными худыми руками. #в_поисках_детства
🕊4👏1
Signed No Name
#в_поисках_детства
🕊3
Signed No Name
К вечеру Максим снял отель на окраине города, где среди березовых рощ и дымящих заводов лежала дорога на Москву. #в_поисках_детства
🕊2🔥1
Signed No Name
На карнизе сидело 5 парней с абсолютно одинаковой внешностью: средний рост, черные волосы, злой прищур, тонкие губы и кривая улыбка. #в_поисках_детства
❤1
Signed No Name
Аксатарен молчал. Максим подошел к стоявшему в углу шкафу. Некогда отполированная поверхность была покрыта пылью, заляпана грязью. Провел пальцем, оставив след. И вдруг в его голове всплыло сразу несколько образов. #в_поисках_детства
❤1
Signed No Name
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @naivety_and_text. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,235,232 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Наивность и текст.” (@naivety_and_text), 24 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/naivety_and_text.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.