Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 奈奈✨的小房子🏘️

Channel

奈奈✨的小房子🏘️

@nainaiji

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,005subscribers

+117 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003907741848
TypeChannel
Username@nainaiji
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 12 April 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nainaiji

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8881,005946.528 August 2026 — 888 subscribers28 August 2026 — 893 subscribers4 September 2026 — 965 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,001 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,005 subscribers28 August 202614 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 17 days, net +117. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 870–1,023 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 22:591,005+4
11 Sept 2026, 19:381,001+36
4 Sept 2026, 03:40965+72
28 Aug 2026, 15:34893+5
28 Aug 2026, 13:15888first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
80.0%
avg views ÷ 1,005 subscribers
Avg views / post
804
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held20 (12 April 202627 August 2026)
Views total1,607
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

39 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3384.6%
💩37.69%
🤮37.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC≈4,310 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026

验证留名】:匿名 【验证时间】:4月19日 【妹子花名】:#奈奈 【联系方式】:@naijiho 【卫生环境】:干净 【所在位置】:武昌 【修车水费】:1p 600 【身高身材】:168,标准 【颜值肤色】:比照片好看,颜值9分,肤色正常 【凶器罩杯】:C 【服务内容】:见课表 【服务详情】:抱着开盲盒的心态来看看,没想到见到本人之后还是惊喜了一下,是我喜欢的类型,老师也很善谈,和老师聊了片刻之后给了水费洗澡,老师很贴心,帮忙擦干,口活很不错,无齿感而且蛮舒服,老师很卖力,不机车,结束后和老师聊了一会儿,和老师呆在一起的时间真的感觉好轻松,身心愉悦。(🐻很大很软很好看,屁股很大,腰很细,后入视觉效果完美) 【优点缺点】:优点:年轻漂亮可爱 缺点:无 【机车行为】:无 【推荐程度】:4.5 /满分5星; 报告私聊机器人,附佐证:现场照片(加藤鹰之手姿势拍照或者手势合拍,不需包含妹子和本人露脸的;聊天记录、打车或导航行驶记录截图)

4

1 Jul 2026, 07:48 UTC≈5,930 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @whbgb_3722

武汉学生会2.0 报告榜 『推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️(参照末尾星级评判标准)』 【验证人 】: 我要100分 【日 期】:4月17日 【美女昵称】:#奈奈 【所属频道】:公开榜 https://t.me/whxsh_985/7117 【地 区】:武昌区 【见面感觉】:(满分9分) 【身材曲线】:9 【风情指数】:9 【技术含量】:8 【年 龄】:19 【身 高】:168 【凶 器】:C 【肤 色】:美白 【人照相似】:8分 【服务内容】:洗澡 口 做 【服务过程】:进门一看,跟照片一样,好漂亮,身材也棒,可爱胸又大;然后开始洗澡,边洗澡边聊天。陪浴帮洗 服务都有,洗完来床上 调情丝袜 胸推都有 尝试了很多姿势口,弟弟口的像金箍棒 老师很有耐心。先开始女上,老师那超高的颜值直勾勾的盯着你,太美太幸福了,前面,后入也都试了,在一声声宝宝

5

1 Jul 2026, 07:47 UTC≈5,570 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @whbgb_3722

武汉学生会2.0 报告榜 『推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️(参照末尾星级评判标准)』 【验证人 】: 蛋黄派 【日 期】:4月19日 【美女昵称】:#奈奈 【所属频道】:公开榜 https://t.me/whxsh_985/7117 【地 区】:武昌区 【见面感觉】:8(满分9分) 【身材曲线】:8 【风情指数】:8 【技术含量】:8 【年 龄】:19 【身 高】:167 【凶 器】:C 【肤 色】:美白 【人照相似】:8分 【服务内容】:洗澡 口 做 【服务过程】:奈奈老师,到了然后付米出击,很漂亮,很惊艳,是我喜欢的类型,洗完澡,然后床上ab面服务,最后带t aiai,女上之后男上,库库出货,带瓶水走人 优点:身高很高,很瘦,颜值也高 缺点:🈚️ 上榜联系 @whlll_bot 群聊 @whxsh_1

1

26 Jun 2026, 13:20 UTC≈5,540 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

6💩1

17 Jun 2026, 04:03 UTC≈5,850 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

昨天应哥哥要求被扎了 我不想再扎了🥹🥹

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nainaiji. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“奈奈✨的小房子🏘️” (@nainaiji), 1,005 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nainaiji.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.