Channel
@naimcommunity
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
507subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002360550235 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @naimcommunity |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/naimcommunity |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:51 | 507 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 507 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (28 May 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 207 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
159 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 48 | 30.2% | |
| 👍 | 45 | 28.3% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 23.9% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 5.66% | |
| 👾 | 8 | 5.03% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 2.52% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 2.52% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 1.89% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @naimcommunity. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 May 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Считать последствия решения до того, как его принял Разрывы в деньгах и падение прибыли. Об этом всё чаще идут мои беседы с предпринимателями. Поэтому пишу этот пост, а в конце по ссылке статья- наш кейс с клиентом для глубокого чтения. Когда отрасль растет, бизнес растет вместе с ней. Эффективность не так важна, важен темп захвата доли и рост. Но теперь растет лишь тот, кто действует и планирует осознанно. Осозн…
❤5👍5🏆2
На ужине с сильными управленцами я вдруг узнал себя двухлетней давности Встреча была с выпускниками МВА МГУ. Получилась хорошая беседа, и судя по отзыву одной из участниц это взаимная оценка. 🧑💻Свои наблюдения после встречи, которыми хочу поделится: - Все участники сообщества очень компетентные признанные и крутые - В рассказе о себе, у каждого присутствует скромность. Мне лично кажется чрезмерная, с учетом тог…
❤4👍2💯2
Завтракали сегодня с Димой Гриц. Я думаю почти все знают, но на всякий случай. Дима человек, миссия которого сделать процесс создания и завершения партнерств в бизнесе более цивилизованным и экологичным. Дима очень щедро делиться пользой как спикер и автор книг. Его канал хорош, я сам читаю, и это не реклама. Мы с Димой резиденты Бизнес-клуба Атланты и периодически спикеры на одной сцене. Позавтракали, обсудили…
🔥14👍9🤝3
Всем привет! Вышла запись вступления с конференции «Прорыв» Не имею права выкладывать все, но отдаю именно свое. Делюсь 👇 https://disk.yandex.ru/i/PstEOySExz6aug
🔥6👍4
А теперь самое важное. Что с этим можно сделать вам. В прошлом посте я закончил на том, что можно бесконечно тратиться на привлечение, потому что клиент уходит без сожаления. А можно растить «пул», к которому клиент возвращается сам и сам же тебя рекомендует. Впечатление это не про «приятно». Это про то, вернётся клиент или нет. А вернётся он или нет - это и есть ваша маржа. Так вот, чтобы понять, как у вас сейча…
💯5👍2🏆1👾1
Почему один и тот же клиент приносит одним кучу денег, а другим - одну сделку и всё В прошлый раз мы считали, сколько стоит новый и клиент. И там был важный момент: часто привлечение не отбивается с первой покупки. Вообще. Вся прибыль прячется дальше. В том, вернётся клиент еще раз или нет. Смотрите, в чём фокус. Привести нового стоит дорого. Удержать того, кто уже у вас покупал, дешевле в разы, за него не надо пл…
❤4💯2🤝1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥2
Channel name was changed to «Польза от Вавилова»
Его обожал весь филиал. А выручка стояла на одном месте годами🤔 В Екатеринбурге до меня работал директор. Реально хороший. Настоящий лидер, с харизмой, энергией, драйвом. Учил людей, наставлял, собирал команду вокруг себя. Его искренне любили. И при всём этом филиал не рос. Выручка стояла на месте годами. Как так-то? Харизматичный директор, заряженная команда, а движения ноль. Я полгода не мог это уложить в голов…
👍8❤7🔥2
Сколько вам стоит новый клиент? Считаем по шагам — просто 🧮 Это база, которую должен знать каждый собственник. Посчитаем вместе, по порядку. 📍 Шаг 1. Сколько стоит привлечь клиента. Берём все затраты на маркетинг и продажи за год и делим на число новых клиентов, пришедших за тот же год. Получаем стоимость одного клиента. Что сюда относить: ▪️ Маркетинг — ФОТ сотрудников, подрядчики (если есть) и рекламные бюджеты…
❤4👍3🔥3
Всем привет. В голосовании победили три темы и первой опишу свои мысли на тему как правильно считать стоимость клиента. Выпуск сделаю до чт. А пока развернутое видео подкаста ☝️с Мариной Шаховой на канале «Лида где Лиды»? Крайне рекомендую посмотреть и приветствую личные вопросы обсуждение или в комментариях. ✌️
❤4👍3🔥2
⚡️НОВЫЙ ВЫПУСК⚡️ Где искать маржу в кризис? | Ошибки, которые съедают прибыль Почему одни компании продолжают расти даже в кризис, а другие работают в ноль? Где искать скрытые точки роста, почему отдел продаж может тормозить развитие бизнеса и как увеличить прибыль без новых клиентов? В новом выпуске подкаста «Лида, где лиды?» говорим о том, как предпринимателям находить маржу в новых экономических условиях. Разби…
❤4👍3🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @naimcommunity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какую тему описать первой?
The shares total 170%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 29 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 527,197 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Польза от Вавилова” (@naimcommunity), 507 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/naimcommunity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.