Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for نقد فلسفه و عرفان

Channel

نقد فلسفه و عرفان

@naghdefalsafe2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

61subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001775705418
TypeChannel
Username@naghdefalsafe2
Descriptionتبيين تضاد قطعی بسیاری از مطالب فلسفی و عرفانی با عقل سلیم و شرع مبین. صوتی و تایپی . از نقد منصفانه مخاطبین محترم استقبال میشود . سيد جعفر موسوي اصفهاني @moosaviesfahani
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/naghdefalsafe2

Growth

617 August 2026 — 61 subscribers10 August 2026 — 61 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 60–62 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 04:3061no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:0661first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Videos
7
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
31m 48s
Average length
7m 57s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

20 Jun 2026, 06:07 UTC13 viewsread 10 August 2026

سخنان مرحوم آیت الله فیاض پیرامون فلسفه و عرفان 👆

20 Jun 2026, 05:51 UTC13 viewsread 10 August 2026

تذکر مهم : تعبیراتی که در سخنان ما از بعض مطالب انحرافی در کلمات فلاسفه و عرفا بعنوان « کفر و....» به کار میرود ؛ مقصود : کفر عقیدتی است نه فقهی ( چنانکه اساسا موضوع مباحث ما مباحث اعتقادی است نه فقهی و کفر عقیدتی با فقهی فرق دارند گر چه در بعض موارد به یک معنی هستند ) . البته این تفاوت برای اهلش واضح است ولی بخاطر تأکید و توضیح لازم شد تذکر داده شود . بنابر این برای فهمیدن معنی کفر فقهی و آثار آن باید به کتب فقهی و

26 Dec 2025, 05:50 UTC36 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

سخنان مرحوم آیت الله دکتر سید فاضل حسینی میلانی نوه مرحوم آیت الله العظمی میلانی در مدتی قبل بعد پخش مستند حدیث سرو از تلویزیون جمهوری اسلامی

26 Dec 2025, 05:25 UTC35 viewsread 10 August 2026

ایت الله سید علی میلانی نوه مرحوم آیت الله العظمی میلانی

26 Dec 2025, 04:43 UTC31 viewsread 10 August 2026

مخفی نماند تعبیر حجةالاسلام از آقای وکیلی و علامه از آقای طهرانی لاله زاری ؛ واقعا خالی از معنی و تعارف محض است فضلای منصف و مطلع کاملا در جریان این امر هستند

26 Dec 2025, 04:41 UTC30 viewsread 10 August 2026

#حضرت_آیت_الله_میلانی آيت الله ميلانى ومكتب تفكيک تقابل یا تعامل: درآستانه کنگره بزرگداشت پنجاهمین سالگرد رحلت آیت الله العظمی میلانی 🔻متاسفانه درسال گذشته مطالب خلاف واقع وتاریخ توسط یکی از طلاب جوان وارادتمندان طیف علامه طهرانی درکانال شخص مزبورمبنی برتقابل آیت الله العظمی میلانی با بزرگان مکتب معارفی خراسان مطرح شد. که در زمان طرح آن؛کم ترین مطالبی درنقد آن ها ارائه نمودم که الان برخوردلازم دانستم آنها رابنویسم تا

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @naghdefalsafe2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 875,472 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نقد فلسفه و عرفان” (@naghdefalsafe2), 61 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/naghdefalsafe2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.