Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NASTILLE

Channel

NASTILLE

@nafashionn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

215subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001849137157
TypeChannel
Username@nafashionn
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nafashionn

Growth

21421621512 August 2026 — 214 subscribers12 August 2026 — 214 subscribers27 August 2026 — 215 subscribers3 September 2026 — 216 subscribers11 September 2026 — 215 subscribers12 August 202611 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 30 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 214–216 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 14:37215-1
3 Sept 2026, 17:37216+1
27 Aug 2026, 04:07215+1
12 Aug 2026, 20:23214no change
12 Aug 2026, 19:33214first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
28s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

80 reactions across 4 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 63235164147411887491620.0%
custom 52017030576115803291518.8%
custom 52044030243777011971518.8%
custom 63255296377115163021316.3%
custom 52940649549225182611215.0%
custom 632341428041889013156.25%
custom 524478226249024672722.50%
custom 632360561262199225622.50%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC65 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

как гласила Любонька Успенская: «не мешайте, я гуляю» что-то меня настолько разнесло с дождливого концерта убель, что я слегла на неделю, спойлер: у меня уже на третий день моего нахождения дома поехала крыша и началась ломка по улице… слава Богу, что я выбралась из оков вирусняка, наконец-то вышла в свет и зашла к своим товарищам панде Катюше, графу Дракуле, Мэйвис и Хэллоу Китти чисто поздороваться✋🏻 вот такой в

custom 52017030576115803298custom 63255296377115163024custom 63236056126219922562custom 52940649549225182611

31 Jul 2026, 11:51 UTC111 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

кулинар Анастасия вас приветствует! мы не будем обсуждать, что все слиплось, главное, что вкусненько получилось)))

custom 63235164147411887499custom 52017030576115803297custom 63255296377115163024custom 52940649549225182612

29 Jul 2026, 20:45 UTC117 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

ubel - было. я прочувствовала весь спектр эмоций: от смешинки до грустинки, даже поплакать успела на «золотом часе» и еще примерно на половине песен… даже несмотря на непрекращающийся ливень, это был потрясающий концерт! я знала, что он не мог не пройти на 10000/10, потому что я знаю наизусть буквально все композицию и обожаю убелевские аранжировки и Варин тембр. храни Господь «мою волну» в яндекс музыке, что когд

custom 52044030243777011978custom 52940649549225182618custom 63234142804188901315custom 63235164147411887494

29 Jul 2026, 17:49 UTC106 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

новый уровень моей личности - поход одной на концерт любимой группы под дождем

custom 52044030243777011977custom 63255296377115163025custom 63235164147411887493custom 52447822624902467272custom 52940649549225182611

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @nafashionn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NASTILLE” (@nafashionn), 215 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nafashionn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.