Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for НАДЯ БУЛАЕВА | Архитектура запуска

Channel

НАДЯ БУЛАЕВА | Архитектура запуска

@nadyabulaeva

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

311subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001716496219
TypeChannel
Username@nadyabulaeva
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nadyabulaeva

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

311320315.510 August 2026 — 320 subscribers11 August 2026 — 320 subscribers17 August 2026 — 317 subscribers25 August 2026 — 315 subscribers1 September 2026 — 314 subscribers17 September 2026 — 311 subscribers10 August 202617 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 38 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 310–321 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 16:19311-3
1 Sept 2026, 05:38314-1
25 Aug 2026, 05:03315-2
17 Aug 2026, 19:08317-3
11 Aug 2026, 07:03320no change
10 Aug 2026, 19:46320first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 02s
Average length
4m 01s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

27 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1037.0%
👍518.5%
🔥518.5%
🎉311.1%
💯311.1%
🦄13.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nadyabulaeva. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 May 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 10:26 UTC15 viewsread 10 August 2026

Самая дорогая ошибка За годы работы я заметила одну закономерность. Можно часами обсуждать упаковку, продажи и запуски. Но не замечать того, что ежедневно забирает деньги. Хаос в процессах и соблюдение законодательной базы (это может казаться сложным особенно тогда, когда только начинаешь). Как это происходит глазами клиента: клиент готов купить, а ему неудобно оплатить. - Когда нужно вручную отправлять ссылки. -

25 Jul 2026, 08:37 UTC34 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Что сейчас, по вашему ощущению, сильнее всего тормозит рост вашего проекта?

  1. Нет стабильных клиентов0%
  2. Не понимаю, что именно продавать0%
  3. Боюсь проявляться и продавать50%

Shares as published, totalling 50%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Jul 2026, 08:30 UTC37 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Настоящая жизнь начинается там, где ты перестаешь быть удобным для всех и начинаешь быть честным с собой

1

25 Jul 2026, 05:40 UTC30 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Иногда эксперт приходит ко мне с запросом: «Помогите продавать больше.» Но уже через 15–20 минут разговора становится понятно, что проблема совсем не в продажах. Не в контенте.Не в прогревах. Не в количестве подписчиков. Проблема в том, что между экспертом и его клиентом образовалась пропасть. С одной стороны огромный опыт, знания, желание помочь. С другой человек, который так и не понял, почему должен выбрать

1

24 Jul 2026, 10:25 UTC20 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Проблема большинства не в том, что они не знают маркетинг. Они не готовы выдержать путь, пока маркетинг начинает работать. Каждый раз я наблюдаю одну и ту же историю. Эксперт выходит в блог. Пишет несколько постов. Снимает Reels. Проводит эфир. Делает первые продажи… или не делает. И именно здесь начинается самое интересное. В голове появляются мысли: «Наверное, это никому не интересно.» «Алгоритмы меня не

💯1

23 Jul 2026, 15:50 UTC19 viewsread 10 August 2026

«Чем глубже человек узнает себя, тем меньше ему приходится играть роли. А чем меньше ролей, тем сильнее его начинают видеть, слышать и выбирать другие» *Надя Булаева

22 Jul 2026, 09:48 UTC36 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Я десять лет наблюдаю одну закономерность. Многие идеально знают маркетинг. Могу пройти десятки обучений. Знать, как вести блог, строить воронки, запускать рекламу и продавать. Но если после трех эфиров без заявок он решает, что «это не работает», проблема не в маркетинге💯 Проблема в ожиданиях. Мы почему-то решили, что хорошие результаты должны приходить быстро. Если после недели ведения блога нет клиентов -

1👍1💯1

25 Jun 2026, 18:05 UTC139 views7 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Video

у тебя в голове энциклопедия & у клиента хаос и нерешенная проблема. Между вами пропасть. Ты пытаешься преодолеть её «полезным контентом», бесконечными постами или просто надеждой на то, что «хорошего эксперта заметят сами». Но в ответ либо тишина, либо клиенты, которые «подумают», «дорого» или просто исчезают из чатов. Знакомое чувство? Ты обладаешь глубочайшими знаниями, но до сих пор не понимаешь, как упаковать

3🔥2🎉1🦄1

21 May 2026, 08:03 UTC163 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, привет! Заметил закономерность: психолог или коуч может годами консультировать, быть профи, иметь «сарафанку», но при этом чувствовать стеклянный потолок. График забит, времени на жизнь нет, а денег ровно столько, сколько успел(а) отработать руками. Я открываю набор на июнь: будем превращать твой опыт в онлайн-продукт. Мы не будем «просто снимать рилсы». Мы внедрим систему продаж из 4 шагов: Упаковка твоег

20 May 2026, 06:45 UTC102 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Как мастеру или психологу выйти из «беличьего колеса» консультаций? Часто слышу от коллег: «График забит, клиенты идут, но я чувствую потолок. Хочу онлайн-продукт, но не знаю, с чего начать». Это абсолютно нормальный этап. Вы уже эксперт, у вас есть доверие. Осталось только «упаковать» ваш опыт в продукт, который будет продаваться без вашего прямого участия 24/7. На июнь набираю небольшую группу. Будем делать запус

👍1

19 May 2026, 06:39 UTC78 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Хватит обменивать часы на деньги. Пора запускаться Друзья, привет! Я открываю набор в группу на июнь. Мы будем делать то, что многие эксперты откладывают месяцами: создавать и запускать ваш онлайн-продукт. Моя система - это 4 четких шага: Упаковка продукта (превращаем ваш опыт в понятное решение). Выстраивание пути клиента (чтобы он сам хотел купить). Выбор рычага продаж. Запуск. Для кого эта группа: Для тех, у ко

💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nadyabulaeva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Jul 2026, 08:37 UTCAnonymous Poll2 voters

Что сейчас, по вашему ощущению, сильнее всего тормозит рост вашего проекта?

  1. Нет стабильных клиентов0%
  2. Не понимаю, что именно продавать0%
  3. Боюсь проявляться и продавать50%

Shares as published, totalling 50%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НАДЯ БУЛАЕВА | Архитектура запуска” (@nadyabulaeva), 311 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nadyabulaeva.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.