Channel
@nadipro_ii
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
733subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002317625350 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nadipro_ii |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nadipro_ii |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 733 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 735 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 738 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 740 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 740 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
146 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 59 | 40.4% | |
| ❤ | 42 | 28.8% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 13.7% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 4.79% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 3.42% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 2.74% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 2.05% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.685% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.685% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.685% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.685% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.685% | |
| 🤷♀ | 1 | 0.685% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 146 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nadipro_ii. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 May 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вокруг хайпа монтажа с нейронкой Claude я относилась скептично Сегодня всё же в него села разобраться и первый тест кстати довольно неплохой, как монтаж у новичка) Я загрузила говорящую голову, подключила пару коннектеров, дала простой промпт: сделай монтаж видео с моушен анимацией, меня в кружок, монтаж, графики и наложение по смыслу добавь снизу На следующей неделе буду пробовать обучать его своему стилю. А вы …
👍3🔥2❤🔥1
Учим английский с ChatGpt, я честно очень сомневалась в этой затее, да и как нейронка услышит мое произношение? ⏺но недавно ChatGpt обновил голосовых ассистентов (можете послушать видео) и я более, чем довольна! И сделала себе промпт с клодом, его преимущество в том: что в начале он определяет уровень и подстраивается, а в конце занятия подводит итоги, что вы усвоили. ПРОМПТ: Ты — мой личный репетитор английского …
❤6🔥3⚡1
Скорее тестите эту фишку в ваших каналах) Огонечки собрали , публикую видео как круто оформлять посты в телеграм.
🔥7❤3👍2
Вы вообще видели, как круто теперь можно оформлять посты???
👀3
Posted without readable text
❤7🔥6👍2
Галяя, у нас отмена нам вернули короткие ссылки, НО если вы как и я всё уже поменяли 🪼обратно менять не нужно) работает и то и другое)
👌4❤2🤷♀1😁1
Телеграм заблокировал старые ссылки, поменяйте свои Я сейчас сижу меняю клиентам ссылки на автоматизации, которые вели в телеграм. ❌Раньше ссылки были: https://t.me/nadipro_ii Домен t.me ограничили и теперь эти ссылки не работают ✅Сейчас заменили на: https://telegram.me/nadipro_ii Посмотрите все свои ресурсы, на которых вели ссылки на телеграм , а также отсылки в постах, чтобы их заменить на новые. И поделитес…
❤5👍5🤯1🙈1
Гпт уводит от моего видения - и спасет ли Claude текста? Такой вопрос прилетел мне на днях. Поделюсь своим 2х летним опытом использования ИИ в качестве копирайтера. 1. Никогда не пишу пост с нуля. У меня всегда есть черновик: мысли, наброски из новостей, инфо от эксперта. ИИ не придумывает за меня → он причёсывает то, что я уже принесла. 2. Обучаю ИИ своему стилю. В Claude - создание скиллов, в ChatGPT - создание…
❤4👍1🔥1
Пару дней занималась монтажом видео на ютуб для клиента Если у вас есть насмотренность, то вы понимаете, что просто говорящую голову долго смотреть тяжело - нужны перебивки кадров. Решила поэкспериментировать с нейросетью Seedance 2.0 - ну и она прям очень порадовала плавной анимацией) У Seedance есть 2 режма Pro(верхнее видео) и Fast(нижнее). Второй чуутка подешевле, но текст плывет. Картинку рисовала с Gpt, а …
🔥5⚡1❤1
Почти 100к на экспертном рилс за сутки 🥳 Я очень радуюсь за своих клиентов, когда залетают ролики) Тем, кто ведёт инстаграм или хочет начать вести скажу сразу, что это играя в долгую дисциплину. Инста раскачивется от 2-3х месяцев минимум. Значит ли это что у эксперта вообще нет заявок? Нет! С экспертами мы всегда используем от 5 источников трафика, какой-то из них приносит больше лидов и подписок, чем остальные …
🔥4⚡2
Лето радует и утром и вечером, особенно после утренних прогулок в апреле мои глаза в невероятном экстазе от зелени 😍
❤4🔥3
Как сделать редактируемую картинку в ChatGPT Единственная неприятная вещь в картинках с нейронками - это если попросить поправить текст или какой-то элемент, то при следующей генерации может вылезти что-то не нужное. Сейчас проблема решена - можно редактировать самим⬇️ В видеоинструкции показала по шагам: 1. Зайти в Canva через гугл аккаунт 2. Подключить canva к ChatGPT 3. Генерируем картинку в ChatGPT 4. Просим …
🔥8❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @nadipro_ii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 537,360 of 1,629,419 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nadi про ИИ│ПРОДВИЖЕНИЕ” (@nadipro_ii), 733 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nadipro_ii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.