Channel
@nadezhda_alimova
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
735subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001701761413 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nadezhda_alimova |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nadezhda_alimova |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:36 | 735 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:23 | 738 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:29 | 737 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 736 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 731 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 731 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
186 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 110 | 59.1% | |
| 🔥 | 51 | 27.4% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 5.91% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 5.38% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.08% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 1.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В субботу меня пригласили на пленэр для художников Передвижник и Невская палитра. Будем тестировать новую акварель и бумагу. Решила, что к такому делу надо подготовиться. Нарвала цветов, разложила их перед собой и... начала рисовать черной тушью. Очень логично перед городским акварельным пленэром, конечно. Зато за один присест получился целый триптих. Теперь повешу его на даче, а заодно буду вспоминать, сколько удо…
❤17🔥5😍2
Пришел вот такой вопрос: Надежда, добрый день! Была вчера у вас на МК по коперплейту. Интересуют вопросы про инструменты, какие перья стоит взять для детей новичков (кажется говорили о звездочке, но она не долговечна) а так же сами держатели косые, играет ли роль материал - дерево или пластик, с углублением для пальцев или просто ровную поверхность. А так же нужны ли подложки на стол, чтобы не запачкать поверхность …
❤9🔥6👍4
Я уже сделала этюд, замерзла, была покусана комарами и хочу домоооооой! Кажется, все-таки пора переходить к нытью. Кисточкам за 87 рублей говорим спасибо, спасли!
❤25🔥15👏2😁1
Вашу Надежду повезли на вечернюю рыбалку, но предусмотрительно взяли обещание не ныть. Признаюсь, грешна, в прошлый раз меня хватило на час. Три часа просидеть на берегу без нытья я могу только если рисую. Взяла с собой кучу акварели, скетчбук, баночку и забыла… кисточки. Поэтому #чтокупилаНадежда по дороге в сельском Фикспрайсе? Правильно, кисточки за 87 рублей. Вот теперь думаю, начинать этюд или сразу начинать н…
❤15😁9🔥5
Английский курсив — стиль, который я впервые попробовала написать 11 лет назад. И пропала. Влюбилась! За эти годы мой стиль сильно изменился. От круглых «облачных» росчерков я ушла к спокойным и летящим, буквы тоже менялись. В какой-то момент я сама не понимала, каким вижу этот стиль. Пережить смутное время помогло обучение копперплейту у Younghae Chung. Сейчас мне очень нравятся заказы, где просят написать строгим…
❤19🔥9👍1
В старших классах я очень любила стихи Есенина. Многое знала наизусть. Но после филфака давно не пересматривала и не перечитывала… Перед поездкой в Константиново, где родился поэт, стала искать его цитаты, чтобы сделать каллиграфию. Насколько же почти всё любимое раньше сейчас не попадает мне в сердце! Но приятно вспомнить детские впечатления 💔. А само Константиво очень понравилось — мы специально приехали в день р…
❤25🔥11👍6
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @nadezhda_alimova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Надежда Алимова и много букв ♥️” (@nadezhda_alimova), 735 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nadezhda_alimova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.