Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Guilty as Sin?🍂𖤓⋆。°(VisionQuest version)

Channel

Guilty as Sin?🍂𖤓⋆。°(VisionQuest version)

@nababafangirldigechie

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

320subscribers

+125 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003923078150
TypeChannel
Username@nababafangirldigechie
DescriptionShe/her پخش کننده چایی در تمامی فندوم‌ها Delusional first; Human second t.me/RedChtBot?start=613236984
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 8 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held10
On Telegramt.me/nababafangirldigechie

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

@nababafangirldigechie was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@nababafangirldigechiye
held 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026

Growth

195320257.58 August 2026 — 195 subscribers8 August 2026 — 195 subscribers8 August 2026 — 219 subscribers16 August 2026 — 230 subscribers24 August 2026 — 246 subscribers30 August 2026 — 252 subscribers9 September 2026 — 262 subscribers16 September 2026 — 286 subscribers12 October 2026 — 320 subscribers12 October 2026 — 320 subscribers8 August 202612 October 2026
10 measurements spanning 65 days, net +125. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 176–339 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 07:22320no change
12 Oct 2026, 06:47320+34
16 Sept 2026, 20:01286+24
9 Sept 2026, 13:41262+10
30 Aug 2026, 06:07252+6
24 Aug 2026, 01:04246+16
16 Aug 2026, 17:35230+11
8 Aug 2026, 23:00219+24
8 Aug 2026, 11:46195no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:30195first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.70%
avg views ÷ 320 subscribers
Avg views / post
18.3
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 October 2026
Posts held36 (8 August 2026 – 11 October 2026)
Views total292
Reactions total25
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,330
Videos
≈1,200
Links
≈261

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 11s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

38 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥1744.7%
🤝1128.9%
😭513.2%
💘37.89%
💋12.63%
🫡12.63%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 11 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Oct 2026, 23:01 UTC24 views5 reactionsread 12 October 2026

میرم بخوابم میشه وقتی بلند شدم ببینم شماهم خیلی دوستشون داشتید و کلی ریکشن و عشق دادید ک بفهمم تنها کسی نیستم ک دوستشون دارم و ذوق کنم🗣

❤‍🔥5

Signed sybelle'🪭ᗢ𖦹°◊

11 Oct 2026, 23:00 UTC22 views3 reactionsread 12 October 2026

و تمام

❤‍🔥3

Signed sybelle'🪭ᗢ𖦹°◊

11 Oct 2026, 22:58 UTC22 views4 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

دووم تو یکسری از کمیک‌ها، قرن‌هارو صرف تلاش برای نجات والریا از ووید کرده=)

❤‍🔥4

Signed sybelle'🪭ᗢ𖦹°◊

11 Oct 2026, 22:58 UTC22 viewsread 12 October 2026

توجه شمارو ب یک کامنت زیر این پست جلب میکنم.

Signed sybelle'🪭ᗢ𖦹°◊

11 Oct 2026, 22:58 UTC19 views3 reactionsread 12 October 2026

(والریا تو کمیک‌های سکرت وارز هست و همش پیش دوومه و الان غمگینم ک تو فیلما نداریمش-)

😭3

Signed sybelle'🪭ᗢ𖦹°◊

11 Oct 2026, 22:57 UTC18 views2 reactionsread 12 October 2026

خلاصه تنها شانس قهرمان‌ها در برابر دووم فقط‌ والریاست و بنده وقتی فنتستیک فور دیدم و فهمیدم والریا بدنیا نیومده غمگین شدم وای امیدوارم در اینده رابطه‌ی قشنگشون رو تو فیلما ببینیم-

😭2

Signed sybelle'🪭ᗢ𖦹°◊

11 Oct 2026, 22:51 UTC15 views1 reactionsread 12 October 2026

ی نفر نوشته بود والریا هیچ قدرتی نداره و یکی جواب داده بود عزیزم دکتر دووم مارو بخاطرش آتیش میزنه نگران نباش نیاز ب قدرتی نداره😂

🫡1

Signed sybelle'🪭ᗢ𖦹°◊

11 Oct 2026, 22:50 UTC15 viewsread 12 October 2026

بله والریا همیشه زنگ میزنه و از دووم مشاوره میگیره-

Signed sybelle'🪭ᗢ𖦹°◊

11 Oct 2026, 22:46 UTC14 views1 reactionsread 12 October 2026

وای تو کمیک‌ها دکتر دووم میمیره؟ یا رید میکشتش؟ ی همچین چیزی حدس بزنید والریا چ میکنه- بله ماشین زمان می‌سازه ک عموش رو برگردونه (واکنش صادقانه رید ک میبینه دخترش میخواد دشمنش رو زنده کنه چون دوستش داره😂)

💘1

Signed sybelle'🪭ᗢ𖦹°◊

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @nababafangirldigechie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Guilty as Sin?🍂𖤓⋆。°(VisionQuest version)” (@nababafangirldigechie), 320 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nababafangirldigechie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.