Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 37 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 374–384 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Sept 2026, 21:41
375
-1
5 Sept 2026, 22:59
376
-3
28 Aug 2026, 14:08
379
-1
15 Aug 2026, 09:47
380
-3
8 Aug 2026, 06:05
383
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:12
383
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
178 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5427275650530566511
84
47.2%
custom 5444978689680896391
33
18.5%
custom 5445064709285902273
17
9.55%
custom 5983380877780980112
14
7.87%
custom 5408869542413746758
13
7.30%
custom 5303175070183607050
6
3.37%
custom 5265270192795040056
4
2.25%
custom 5309911627603131061
4
2.25%
custom 5434115665122322750
3
1.69%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 178 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @na_korotke. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Мы не можем быть уверенными, но мы можем быть уверенными. Давайте посчитаем в уме, просто гипотетически, сокращая десятично дробящегося на травмах Де Йонга. В Барсе окажется также травмоопасный, как сосулька в весеннюю капель, но куда более основательный, Родри.
Что сразу лезет в голову? Лишь одно слово, будем честными. УСИЛЕНИЕ. Это, пусть хоть на 10, хоть на 15 матчей, безусловное укрепление центра поля. Это стоп…
Мне даже жаль, что Аргентина нанесла эти два удара по воротам.
Вернее, как — если бы забила, то пускай. А так на статистической иллюстрации испанского перфекционизма появились два битых пикселя. Не страшно, но раздражает.
Помню, формулировал лет 16 (боже!) назад: сборная Испании (или, с оговорками, «Барселона») хочет играть в футбол одна, ей соперники на поле не нужны.
Команда де ла Фуэнте этот принцип довела до а…
Скалони расплакался на пресс-конференции после финала. Худшее, что можно было сделать. Никакого достоинства. Никакого осознания того, что вы показали в главном матче четырехлетия, и как себя вели твои игроки и во время, и после него. Никакого мужского самообладания. Скалони реально считает, что они тоже заслуживали победы? Ему реально после такого жаль, что кубок достался не им? Скалони жаль себя и свою провальную по…
🇪🇸 🏆Испанцы проделали колоссальную работу, конечно. Фундаментальная подготовка с четким выстраиванием плана на игру, состава, ролей вплоть до глубоких запасных. Бешеный объем на поле, фантастический контроль на мяче и координированные действия в обороне. Да что там, они с Симоном в воротах умудрились стать чемпионами мира. С играющим на пол шестого Оярсабалем в старте во всех матчах. С корявым Фабианом Руисом вместо …
custom 542727565053056651116
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @na_korotke. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Накоротке” (@na_korotke), 375 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/na_korotke.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
