Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

На Чуечке⚽️

@na4ye4ke

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

593subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002356622392
TypeChannel
Username@na4ye4ke
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/na4ye4ke

Growth

5915935927 Aug 2026, 07:02 — 591 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 05:02 — 593 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 07:028 Aug 2026, 05:02
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 591–593 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 05:02593+2
7 Aug 2026, 07:02591first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
116.5%
avg views ÷ 593 subscribers
Avg views / post
691
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held19 (17 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total12,440
Reactions total497
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

497 reactions across 18 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍16934.0%
🔥10721.5%
🖕5711.5%
😁448.85%
336.64%
163.22%
😎122.41%
🍾112.21%
🤡102.01%
🥴81.61%
71.41%
🍌51.01%
🤝40.805%
👏30.604%
💅30.604%
20.402%
👌20.402%
🫡20.402%
🎃10.201%
🤔10.201%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 497reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @na4ye4ke. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC403 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Загреб просто звери

😁23

4 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC320 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mqfantasy

🇳🇱 | Фэнтези-превью Эредивизи Блок 1: аутсайдеры Блок 2: середняки Блок 3: группа лидеров Блок 4: ПСВ ⚠️ Важное уточнение по превью Эта серия превью была достаточно поверхностной: многие потенциально интересные пики могли остаться без внимания, так как анализ строился в первую очередь на субъективном взгляде. Кроме того, информация в футболе меняется очень быстро. Новые трансферы на вход и выход происходят ежедне

👍4👏2🔥2😁2

3 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC471 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

На этой неделе стартуют целых 2 чемпионата в фентези - Нидерланды и Португалия. Здесь можно почитать новости про Эредевизи. Здесь начались отличные подробные разборы команд Эредевизи в разрезе фентези. Здесь чуть попозже начнутся отличные разборы статистики по Эредевизи. Здесь можно будет почитать разборы про всё о Примейре, от трансферов до статистики рекавери. Здесь на этой неделе выйдут подкасты, посвященные ст

👍17🔥64🖕32

3 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC439 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Итоги тура. Не сильно хотелось их подводить, потому что любая попытка здесь провести работу над ошибками выглядела бы выпендрёжем. Поэтому всё просто, у меня была тактика, я её придержался, она сработала - топ результат. В Динамо в Калининграде не верилось - уехали пустые. В Глушенкова против Оренбурга верилось - сработало. Ошибка, пожалуй, одна. Поменять Даку на Соболя перед дедлайном после новостей о переходе. Но

👍27🖕142🍌2💅2😁2🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC680 views76 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Забыл про пост с составом. Замены лично для меня простые - Кривцов и Соболев вместо Бителло и Тюкавина. Третья замена, что называется - на противоход всем, кто сливает Глушенкова я его беру и кэплю. Мальчики ставят лайки, девочки - ставят сердечко, мужчинские писюнярики - ставят 🖕

🖕40👍11🥴7🤡53🍌3🔥32

28 Jul 2026, 07:19 UTC876 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Итоги. Каналы рефлексируют, подводя итоги тура, у многих тур хороший, потому что любят плохих мальчиков, у кого-то средний. А я просто доволен, что не улетел слишком далеко. С Петровым не повезло, Оффор головкой залез в оффсайд, с Фассоном не повезло, Мих Мих решил не ждать две минуты для сухаря, с Битком не повезло, каким-то чудом Крылья устояли от пропущенных, несмотря на множество моментов. В целом - тур не гавно

👍21😁10🤔1

24 Jul 2026, 16:47 UTC≈1,080 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Стартуем! я начну стрелять Решил начать максимально базово как только смог + стратегию через Петрова за 7. В следующем туре удобно уходит в Грипши/Самородова/Касинтуру(если постараться). В защите всё жирное, на воротах попсовая утренняя кашка. В атаке Тюк, из топ2 чемпионата РПЛ - по одному защитнику))) Всем фо!!

🔥10🫡2

24 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC780 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.sports.ru/football/blogs/3424998.html?prevUrlHash=blogFeed#postCreated Ой что не вечер, то футбол! Для тех, кто по каким-то причинам не смог послушать прошедший подкаст, краткое резюме, о чём общались мы с гостями. Ждём составов ЦСКА - Балтика и запасаемся 🍺 https://telegra.ph/Kratkaya-vyzhimka-podkasta-dlya-teh-u-kogo-ne-bylo-vremeni-poslushat-07-24

👍122🤝1

23 Jul 2026, 18:25 UTC751 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sweetsoure

Posted without readable text

👍86👌2

23 Jul 2026, 09:40 UTC488 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mqfantasy

Posted without readable text

👍236🤝3

22 Jul 2026, 18:40 UTC728 views44 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

🚨🚨🚨ПоИсКИ РАКОВа к пИву!!🚨🚨🚨 Удобно уселись в своих креслах, и обсудили предстоящий сезон РПЛ в деталях и заковыристых вопросах с шутками и набросами. 00:40 Вратарские выборы 05:39 Базовые защитники 10:27 Жирные базовые полузащитники и их приоритетность 15:03 Нападающие и распределение бюджета 19:43 Средний сегмент - защита 23:23 Средний сегмент - полузащита 6-7 28:08 Что лучше - пз 10,5+5,5 или пз 8+8? 31:10 Диффер

🔥22🍾117👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @na4ye4ke. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 239,004 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“На Чуечке⚽️” (@na4ye4ke), 593 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/na4ye4ke.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.