Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Никита Дащук

@n_dashchuk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

254subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001707961357
TypeChannel
Username@n_dashchuk
DescriptionНикита ДАЩУК Мастхев для всех, кто связан с продажами инфопродуктов Сделал больше 1 млн $ в онлайне Теперь хочу 10 000 000 в месяц Показываю как прийду к этому за 1 год. Блог про людей, результативные продукты и КУЧУ денег в онлайн образовании.
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/n_dashchuk

Growth

2542582567 Aug 2026, 11:12 — 258 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:22 — 254 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:18 — 254 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 11:128 Aug 2026, 09:18
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 253–259 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 09:18254no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:22254-4
7 Aug 2026, 11:12258first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 5 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.5%
avg views ÷ 254 subscribers
Avg views / post
108
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
38.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (5 January 20267 August 2026)
Views total216
Reactions total82
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
44
Videos
31
Links
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 49s
Average length
56s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

519 reactions across 17 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19738.0%
🔥16932.6%
😁315.97%
💘203.85%
❤‍🔥183.47%
152.89%
🥰101.93%
👏91.73%
🏆81.54%
💩81.54%
💔71.35%
🙈50.963%
👍40.771%
🙏40.771%
🤡40.771%
🗿30.578%
🌭20.385%
😨20.385%
🤣20.385%
👎10.193%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 519reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
111
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
111
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @n_dashchuk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 January 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC89 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

ПОЗДРАВЛЯЮ! ВЫ СОЖГЛИ предыдущий пост своими огоньками🔥 Не стыдно вам?😂 Реально делать контент прийдется с такой активностью видимо… На самом деле очень рад вернуться в инфополе))) Думаю самое время💪🏻 Начну с того, что в Марте у меня произошло довольно болезненное расставание с проектов, который мы качали почти 1,5 года и долго я находился в странном состоянии. Если уж быть полностью честным то последний год было

16❤‍🔥10💘10

7 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC127 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Здарова! Я в жоском ПРАЙМЕ) Не помню за последний год таких состояний у себя😂 Сегодня напишу вам с новостями, че где куда у меня вообще твориться тут Кто ждет - огонек ебаните🔥

🔥29🏆863

6 Jul 2026, 15:34 UTC470 views48 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥2513💘8🌭2

11 Jun 2026, 19:12 UTC838 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Привет новым подписчикам! Ты топ, вы только подписались, а я уже вас люблю❤️ Вас тут скоро ещё больше будет, потому что я впервые в жизни купил рекламу Прикиньте! Это пиздец победа для меня Очковал это делать года 3 и вот зажмурился и сделал) Наверное быть смелым - выгоднее вдолгую) Вот я и проверю эту гипотезу😂 Взлетаем по-тихой, обнял🙌 Если вы с эфира можно в комменты написать отзыв как вам?👇

🔥2210💘2

5 Jun 2026, 19:40 UTC779 views33 reactions111 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

21🔥7🥰5

1 Jun 2026, 09:34 UTC792 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

1 рекомендация = 200к в кассу Тигран недавно купил консультацию с запросом добить лям на запуске 🟠Было: Ниша - обучение для Ии-креаторов Выручка ~ 800к Уже закончили запуск и продукт стартанул 🟠Стало: Один точный смысл, который добавили в прогрев дал 3 продажи + 200к к запуску Пробили 1🍋🤝 Новые люди зашли + догрелись и купили те, с кем уже было общение 💲Вывод: Тигран реально Тигр) Поздравляем с первым лямом выр

94🥰3

26 May 2026, 14:29 UTC623 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Ловите мега кайфовый лесной подкаст про то, почему скорее всего вы стоите на месте и не двигаетесь дальше) Кодовое название "Елки-Палки" Я не сошел с ума - поймете, когда послушаете😹 3:27 — Ты уже не живешь свою жизнь, если делаешь это... 5:35 — Думаешь это "База базючая"? А №ихуя! 8:00 — Что видишь - тем и становишься 11:17 — Помоему ты видишь только 1 палку... 14:08 — Хватит думать, что другим просто повезло

12🔥9👏3

12 May 2026, 17:26 UTC653 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

НЕОДНОЗНАЧНЫЕ ЭМОЦИИ вызывает у меня день ног в зале… 🤢 Ненавижу, когда делаешь подход этих ебучих выпадов, а потом тебя тошнит… 🥰 С другой стороны, в такие моменты чувствуешь себя таким классным и живым. Интересно, а что если я стану фитнес блогером и начну снимать рилсы с рецептами протеиновых бутербродов? вы сильно ахуеете?🤔

10😁9

11 May 2026, 19:06 UTC563 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁2214🔥9🤣2

30 Apr 2026, 09:33 UTC708 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мой первый шаг⚡️ Знаете же вот это чувство, когда идея пришла в голову какая-то и думашь "Кайф, надо сделать!" Потом думаешь "ну завтра сделаю точно🤝" А потом "да наверное попозже сделаю, пока не до этого" Ну и так проходят дни/недели/месяцы… и с каждым ждем все больнее от того, что идея гниёт и умирает по итогу умирает внутри тебя 🫠 У меня так было с идеей вести Youtube! Обычно мы сильно усложняем первый шаг,

19❤‍🔥7🔥6

19 Feb 2026, 16:03 UTC≈1,020 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ведём веб про клиентов в нашем основном проекте по дизайну карточке с @vechtomovdesign Делаем вместе 3-ий запуск, год уже работаем (Если вы вдруг не знали вдруг🥰) Последний поток нашего легендарного курса запускаем 💔🥹 Кто угадает пиковый онлайн этого эфира в комментариях - тому дарю кофе с шоколадкой👇🏻

11💩8🔥7🤡4🗿3🥰2👎1

16 Feb 2026, 16:28 UTC810 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Заменил сиги на чай 🫖 Мы не курим уже месяц Бросили вместе с любимой женщиной) Сложно ли было и как решились? Да! Особенно Даше! Ломало её жоско и довольно долго😂 и до сих пор иногда ломает Я на удивление я перенес проще чем думал. Фильмы не смотрел, книги не читал. Просто хотел бросить и думал об этом наверное пол года. И утром в рандомный день решился. Ну и Даша подтянулась, ей конечно респект за такое решение

11🔥7👏6

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @n_dashchuk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 516,009 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Никита Дащук” (@n_dashchuk), 254 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/n_dashchuk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.