刚到几个aaaabc abcccc用户名 @ojxxxx @exffff @kkkktm @kkkkmz 喜欢来问 @n7nu7
custom 54406700600939224008

Channel
@n8nu8
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
11subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003599118434 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @n8nu8 |
| Description | Transaction contact🤝 @n7nu7 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 7 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/n8nu8 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 11 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:59 | 11 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 7 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
130 reactions across 10 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 6305458486738162932 | 24 | 18.5% | |
| custom 5440670060093922400 | 21 | 16.2% | |
| custom 6305465088102897182 | 16 | 12.3% | |
| custom 5361781191722699867 | 12 | 9.23% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 9.23% | |
| custom 5361986358015463601 | 10 | 7.69% | |
| custom 5362006552951690043 | 10 | 7.69% | |
| custom 5362084755716214813 | 8 | 6.15% | |
| custom 5361853256978959774 | 5 | 3.85% | |
| custom 5361841922560266597 | 4 | 3.08% | |
| custom 5361643400581907583 | 3 | 2.31% | |
| custom 5363972466857252756 | 3 | 2.31% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 1.54% |
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 130reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 26 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
刚到几个aaaabc abcccc用户名 @ojxxxx @exffff @kkkktm @kkkkmz 喜欢来问 @n7nu7
custom 54406700600939224008
Completed
custom 63054650881028971825custom 53619863580154636012
傻逼诈骗犯 操你妈 从此以后再也不先转让礼物 @yeshen1888
Completed
custom 53620847557162148135
低价出售一套红色礼物背景墙
👍3custom 53619863580154636013custom 53620065529516900433custom 53620847557162148133custom 63054650881028971823
低价出售 https://t.me/nft/DeskCalendar-88747 https://t.me/nft/DeskCalendar-52456 https://t.me/nft/IceCream-127279 https://t.me/nft/CandyCane-44175 https://t.me/nft/CloverPin-44109 https://t.me/nft/MoonPendant-13350 https://t.me/nft/FaithAmulet-114042 https://t.me/nft/LolPop-172358 https://t.me/nft/LolPop-110256 https://t.me/nft/PartySparkler-178937 喜欢来问 @n7nu7
Completed
Gift Sold
NFT用户名出售👍 @us_sd @xbofi @ofuti @sruao @ozozozozozozozozozo 以上用户名任选 9u一个 打包也是9u批发价
custom 53618532569789597745custom 53617811917226998674custom 63054584867381629324👍3
42u出售 已上链的黑底棒棒糖 即使死号了也不会消失
custom 63054584867381629325👍4
🧸 新款女神节节日限定粉色小熊 1u一个
custom 63054584867381629324custom 54406700600939224003custom 63054650881028971823👍2🤩2custom 53619863580154636012
漂亮的粉底礼物已出售 Gift Sold
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @n8nu8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@n8nu8 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“呓语yiyu” (@n8nu8), 11 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/n8nu8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.