Channel
@n4llitFLD
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
52subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003156561395 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @n4llitFLD |
| Description | 강추위 4 Revast ! Flood. — 🖤 ( Girls ) own$ @DaylisAsf »» Набоr откrыt — 핫초코 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/n4llitFLD |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 52 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 52 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
63 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5206591666697306436 | 11 | 17.5% | |
| custom 5206435050714855938 | 10 | 15.9% | |
| custom 5206527555720481281 | 9 | 14.3% | |
| custom 5206629977805589998 | 7 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5206666454962834107 | 7 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5208654324741211065 | 7 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5208942499866904031 | 7 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5208575198558718801 | 5 | 7.94% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2026 to 7 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
@AnlemyFam @AnlemyFam @AnlemyFam @AnlemyFam @AnlemyFam @AnlemyFam @AnlemyFam @AnlemyFam @AnlemyFam @AnlemyFam @AnlemyFam @AnlemyFam @AnlemyFam @AnlemyFam @AnlemyFam @AnlemyFam @AnlemyFam @AnlemyFam
Signed 사랑 : Mir͟͟a͟͟g͟͟e͟͟T͟͟e͟͟s͟͟sa »
Патент за нами..
Signed 사랑 : Mir͟͟a͟͟g͟͟e͟͟T͟͟e͟͟s͟͟sa »
ПРИВЕТ, @AnlemyFam Я знаю, чтт я заебала
Signed 사랑 : Mir͟͟a͟͟g͟͟e͟͟T͟͟e͟͟s͟͟sa »
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed 𝟣𝟫𝟴𝟵 * πᴧɑׁׅтuн𐐼 :
💕 — This is the END of our story !! 👻👻 »» Thank You ❤️ ❓ YJ - Ммм, ребята, я вас всех очень люблю! Но одна я не могу справляться с флудом — выгорание постоянно меня беспокоит. Поддержки нет, и, как бы я ни пыталась справиться с этим, каждый раз оно проявлялось снова… Была рада провести с вами время, спасибо вам! 👻👻🤩 ⛔ Bye Bye..
custom 52064350507148559383custom 52065275557204812813custom 52065916666973064363custom 52089424998669040313
Signed 𝟣𝟫𝟴𝟵 * πᴧɑׁׅтuн𐐼 :
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed 𝟣𝟫𝟴𝟵 * πᴧɑׁׅтuн𐐼 :
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed 𝟣𝟫𝟴𝟵 * πᴧɑׁׅтuн𐐼 :
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed 𝟣𝟫𝟴𝟵 * πᴧɑׁׅтuн𐐼 :
Вот мои самые крутые и единственные участники💕🩷
custom 52064350507148559383custom 52065916666973064363custom 52066664549628341073custom 52086543247412110652custom 52065275557204812811custom 52066299778055899981custom 52085751985587188011custom 52089424998669040311
Signed Тесса Дэйлис
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed Тесса Дэйлис
🤩𝖭𝖾𝗐Update & 140126 🤩 - Набор открыт!! все люди из чата были удалены, ждем всех во флуд (( . . 🎀
custom 52066299778055899983custom 52065916666973064362custom 52066664549628341072custom 52085751985587188012custom 52064350507148559381custom 52065275557204812811custom 52086543247412110651custom 52089424998669040311
Signed Тесса Дэйлис
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed Тесса Дэйлис
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @n4llitFLD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,002,919 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@n4llitFLD named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Closed﹕ Ꭱꫀׁׅܻ݊𝒗astׁׅ f͟͟l͟͟d͟͟ ( !! )” (@n4llitFLD), 52 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/n4llitFLD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.