Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

нэркош.com

@n3rkom

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

127subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003371543368
TypeChannel
Username@n3rkom
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/n3rkom

Growth

126127126.511 Aug 2026, 09:17 — 126 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 19:42 — 127 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 09:1711 Aug 2026, 19:42
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 126–127 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 19:42127+1
11 Aug 2026, 09:17126first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
57.5%
avg views ÷ 127 subscribers
Avg views / post
73.0
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held19 (4 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total1,387
Reactions total123
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
37s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

123 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52040778910584382943629.3%
custom 54631488365894313763024.4%
custom 52043264021611522582117.1%
custom 52852390462373551501713.8%
custom 54652362078751603381310.6%
custom 534625779264052284432.44%
custom 546535239533045162532.44%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 123reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @n3rkom. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC21 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

пр как у вас дела , я пошла делать часть для коллабы🤩

custom 52852390462373551503

Signed о, это нэркош

10 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC24 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @kf_VadimNemikoPhoto

🅰️ривет! Это «𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝓥 𝓪 𝓭 𝓲 𝓶 𝓝 𝓮 𝓶 𝓴 𝓸», мы рады приветствовать тебя в нашем КФ. Ты любишь Вадима? Ты хочешь обсудить с кем-то свои хэдканоны? У тебя есть творчество по этому персонажу? 😇😇 Тогда тебе к нам! Рады приветствовать Ссылка на любимого

Signed о, это нэркош

10 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC7 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @srach_rumangPhoto

▪️🔝🔝🔝🔝🔝 ▪️▪️▪️🔝🔝🔝🔝🔝 ▪️▪️▪️▪️🔗🔗🔗🔗🔗 😭🔤🔠е за хуйня тв0рится в н0в0й гл4ве… 😏🔤🔠т0 уж4сный км, п0чему ег0 все любят и 0пр4вдыв4ют??? 😔🔤🔠т0т ф4нд0м уже не сп4сти… ׅ⠀ིྀ ׄ𓂃🤩🤩 — 🤩онимаешь, ❤️✍️❤️❤️о чем я🤩🤎🤎 🤩🤩тогда ты по адресу❤️ 😁🎤здесь ты м0жешь св0е мнение к4с4тельн0 д4нн0г0 фд 4бс0лютн0 4н0нимн0 без з4зрения с0вести🤩⭐😴😴 🤩🤩от для тейков - @srachrumang_bot 🤩🤩дмин состав 🤩🤩п постачня ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎︎ ︎

Signed о, это нэркош

10 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC15 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @hate_rumangi_confPhoto

— охохох я ТРУШНЫЙ КИНН Юра, ведь я тоже ношу футболку ссср и митенки — ооо, А Я ТРУ КИНН ЯРИКА, ПОТОМУ ЧТО ПУСТИЛ ВСЕХ ПО КРУГУ — А Я TRUE ВЛАДИМИР, И Я ИЩУ СВОЕГО TRUE МАТВЕЯ, ЧТОБЫ НАЧАТЬ ОТНОШЕНИЯ ПО ИНТЕРНЕТУ. 😀НУ ВЫ И КОНЧЕННЫЕ, РЕБЯТ)🖼 😀🔤ОБРО ПОЖАЛОВАТЬ В 😀😀🔤РАЧ ФД РУМАНГ‼️ Именно здесь, вы можете высказать все свое недовольство насчёт той или определённой руманги и её комьюнити. ☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️ вп

Signed о, это нэркош

10 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC48 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

о вовчек

custom 54652362078751603383

Signed о, это нэркош

10 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC56 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

реакт; рт ; коммы🥹🖤 🥹🥹🖤🤩@n3rkom🥹🥹 🌸🌸🌸🥹🥹 #вместе 🤍🤍🤍 тик ток 🤩👻

custom 52040778910584382949custom 52043264021611522581custom 52852390462373551501custom 53462577926405228441custom 54631488365894313761custom 54652362078751603381custom 54653523953304516251

Signed о, это нэркош

10 Aug 2026, 06:18 UTC54 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

прикол я сделала эдит но мне не сделать качество из за того что интернета в поезде нету , сука облом👹

custom 52852390462373551503custom 53462577926405228441

Signed о, это нэркош

9 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC61 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

прикол , мы добили 1400 в тт наконец то самая большая цифра которую я когда либо видела за время создания фак акков 👌

custom 52040778910584382944custom 52852390462373551503

Signed наркоман нэркош

7 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC82 views18 reactions6 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

,реакт; рт ; коммы🥹🖤 🥹🥹🖤🤩@n3rkom🥹🥹 🌸🌸🌸🥹🥹 #осколкиснов 🤍🤍🤍 тик ток 🤩👻

custom 546314883658943137610custom 52852390462373551503custom 52040778910584382942custom 52043264021611522582custom 54652362078751603381

Signed наркоман нэркош

7 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC80 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

я нашла какие то новые туторы на ютубе поэтому второй эдит сегодня с задержкой ыыыы скил надо поднимать как нт как

custom 54652362078751603382

Signed наркоман нэркош

7 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC86 views18 reactionsread 11 August 2026

вам нужны вадюры под ксб мьюз завтра? 🖤- да 🖤- извени но нет

custom 520407789105843829413custom 52043264021611522585

Signed наркоман нэркош

7 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC90 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

подожди сколько? 114? я думала у меня на пожизненно будет 110 ээээ я седня ещё эдит готовлю ццц 🖕

custom 52852390462373551503custom 53462577926405228441

Signed наркоман нэркош

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @n3rkom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 379,329 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“нэркош.com” (@n3rkom), 127 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/n3rkom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.