Channel
@n1luwka15
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
448subscribers
-49 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002712808171 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @n1luwka15 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/n1luwka15 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 448 | -9 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:00 | 457 | -16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 473 | -10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:29 | 483 | -11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 494 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:19 | 497 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 497 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 24 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,061 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5384303076804954021 | 271 | 25.5% | |
| custom 5334529864747738587 | 263 | 24.8% | |
| custom 5440481072942971461 | 187 | 17.6% | |
| custom 5264852112088528577 | 84 | 7.92% | |
| custom 5407125390554599073 | 75 | 7.07% | |
| custom 5287345508652717680 | 74 | 6.97% | |
| custom 5289783632737639443 | 56 | 5.28% | |
| custom 5359564984302988124 | 51 | 4.81% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,061 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 13 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
если меня спросят, кто тот человек, который заставляет меня улыбаться, я с радостью расскажу про тебя.
custom 538430307680495402118custom 544048107294297146116custom 533452986474773858715
Signed ️️️н'
настоящая любовь не громкая, она тихо живёт в сердце🤍
custom 544048107294297146126custom 533452986474773858723custom 538430307680495402121
Signed ️️️н'
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 538430307680495402126custom 544048107294297146126custom 533452986474773858725
Signed ️️️
аси🥰
custom 538430307680495402128custom 533452986474773858726custom 544048107294297146126
Signed ️️️н'
Любишь не любишь-не знаю но запомни, я с чистым сердцем люблю тебя и всегда жду твои сообщения
custom 533452986474773858724custom 538430307680495402124custom 544048107294297146122
Signed ️️️н'
🤩❤️
custom 538430307680495402125custom 544048107294297146124custom 533452986474773858723
Signed ️️️н'
зериканлр учун гр✌️🏻🦦
custom 544048107294297146120custom 533452986474773858719custom 538430307680495402118
Signed ️️️н'
В конце-концов всё будет хорошо. Если не хорошо — значит, это ещё не конец....)
custom 544048107294297146127custom 533452986474773858725custom 538430307680495402124
Signed ️️️н'
кайфиятим сенга боглик эканини билганингда эди)
custom 533452986474773858721custom 540712539055459907319custom 526485211208852857718
Signed ️️️н'
- Men sizga kimman? -…♥️
custom 526485211208852857736custom 533452986474773858730custom 540712539055459907328
Signed ️️️н.
он говорит, что мне невозможно угодить, а мне для счастья нужно лишь солнце и букет любимых цветов
custom 533452986474773858731custom 526485211208852857730custom 540712539055459907328
Signed ️️️н.
❤️
custom 528734550865271768043custom 538430307680495402132custom 535956498430298812428
Signed ️️️н
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @n1luwka15. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@n1luwka15 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“333 new love” (@n1luwka15), 448 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/n1luwka15.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.