В ожидании следующего шага *MTONGA 😄 MTONGA — Make Traders On Telegram Cry Again P.S. в лодке еще осталось чуток места 😁
😁15🙈5😱1

Channel
@n1ghtmarezz_story
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
169subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002128636685 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @n1ghtmarezz_story |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/n1ghtmarezz_story |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:56 | 169 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:16 | 170 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 173 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 175 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 174 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:51 | 174 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
405 reactions across 19 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 104 | 25.7% | |
| 🔥 | 99 | 24.4% | |
| ❤ | 70 | 17.3% | |
| 🦄 | 34 | 8.40% | |
| 🤣 | 18 | 4.44% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 3.70% | |
| 🎉 | 13 | 3.21% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 1.73% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 1.48% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 1.23% | |
| 🙈 | 5 | 1.23% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 1.23% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 0.988% | |
| ☃ | 3 | 0.741% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 0.741% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 0.741% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 0.494% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.494% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.494% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 0.494% | |
| 3 further kinds | 3 | 0.741% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 405 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @n1ghtmarezz_story. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 May 2026 to 29 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В ожидании следующего шага *MTONGA 😄 MTONGA — Make Traders On Telegram Cry Again P.S. в лодке еще осталось чуток места 😁
😁15🙈5😱1
Главное — сохранять уверенный вид до последнего 😄
🤣18👍4😭2🔥1
Рынок красный, индекс страха на 20, в чатах снова хоронят крипту. Эмоции тут худший советник, предлагаю выдохнуть, тем паче лето на дворе. Мы это уже проходили, и не раз. Покупай страх, продавай жадность — ничто не ново под луной. 🍿 15 июня TON стал GRAM. По факту, делать ничего не нужно — как лежал у вас актив, так и лежит, ничего особо не изменилось. А вот ожидания вокруг делистинга и переименования на биржах меся…
👍9❤6🦄2
Случилось страшное — выходной 😨 Наконец-то можно "потрогать траву", отдохнуть от бесконечных уведомлений, а ещё почитать книгу — просто так, в удовольствие. Сам в лёгком шоке: прошлый раз был при каком-то совсем другом курсе биткоина. Эпоха быстрого контента отлично выдрессировала мозг не задерживаться ни на чём дольше пятнадцати секунд. Бесполезно для жизни, удобно для скролла. Стоило сбавить обороты и отжать один…
❤14👍9🔥2🤗2🙏2
💎 Ton Встречайте GRAM Немного вводных: В 2018 в первом вайтпейпере монета называлась Gram. В 2020 SEC прихлопнул проект, Дуров вернул инвесторам $1.7 млрд и ушёл. Сеть "пересобрало комьюнити" — уже под именем Toncoin. Спустя 6 лет Дуров забирает имя, которое у него отжали. И вот тут, думаю, дело даже не в стратегии, а в характере. Давайте честно: Павел — нарцисс межгалактического масштаба. Постит разные рофлы на 1…
🔥22❤9🦄8
Как весь шум уляжется, хоть немного - соберем и разберем всю фактуру :)
👍12🦄2🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥3👍2
💎 TON’s native currency is becoming Gram. 🤑 Gram was the original name of TON’s currency in the first white paper. 🌱 We’re returning to our roots — and starting a new chapter. ✈️ This rebranding will pave the way for what comes next. ⏳ The transition will take around 3 weeks. 💪 TON remains the name of the blockchain. 🪙 This is step 4 of 7 to Make TON Great Again.
🔥6🍾3🦄2
По случаю 5-летия TON, поздравляю всех 🍷 Немного о том, как всё начиналось — и где мы сейчас. https://x.com/n1ghtmarezzX/status/2059079356358480013
❤13🎉9🔥3🦄1
Чую пост про следующий шаг MTONGA и некий намек, что нас ожидают подобные нагрузки ✍️ Что ж, еще посидим 🚽
👍10❤6☃3🔥2😎1
Интересный типаж 🚑 Громкий, заносчивый, с ощущением что он немного выше остальных. Никто не выбирал его, "самым умным в комнате" — он просто однажды решил, что является им. Выстраивает иерархию не потому что сильный. А потому что в компании реально сильных — не тянет. Там не покомандуешь, ибо надо соответствовать. Проще найти тех, кто попроще, собрать свою маленькую свиту и возглавить этот цирк. Вокруг таких всегда …
👍14🔥8❤🔥7🕊3✍2💯1😢1
Горизонт планирования — странная штука 🤔 Год назад «долгосрочно» означало «куплю и подожду бычки». Сегодня ты не знаешь, что будет актуально через два года вообще. ИИ переписывает правила быстрее, чем люди успевают обновить резюме. Думаю, проблема не в том, что мир меняется — он всегда менялся. Проблема в скорости. Раньше у тебя было время адаптироваться. Сейчас окно между «новая технология появилась» и «все ею поль…
❤7🤔5👀4🔥1🦄1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @n1ghtmarezz_story. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“n1ghtmarezz.ton” (@n1ghtmarezz_story), 169 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/n1ghtmarezz_story.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.