Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 民主、自由与宅

Channel

民主、自由与宅

@mzzyyz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

66subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001286440639
TypeChannel
Username@mzzyyz
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 5 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/mzzyyz

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

666766.56 August 2026 — 67 subscribers10 August 2026 — 67 subscribers25 September 2026 — 66 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 50 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 66–67 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 09:3866-1
10 Aug 2026, 01:0267no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:4467first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2024 to 23 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Mar 2024, 01:04 UTC125 viewsread 10 August 2026

#记录心情 被新冠折磨了一周,发烧其实就1天,但是猛烈咳嗽了6天了,搞得人精气神全都没了。 柏拉图说得非常好,理性和健康的体魄都很重要。

Signed sona Per

20 Mar 2024, 09:50 UTC135 viewsread 10 August 2026

#记录心情 邯郸初中生事件本质不是校园霸凌。还在讨论校园霸凌是因为只能讨论到这一层,更深的层次已经失去了在舆论公共场讨论的空间了。 并不是什么“地狱空荡荡,恶魔在人间”,这里就是地狱。

Signed sona Per

12 Mar 2024, 13:29 UTC139 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

#记录心情 中南海和记者会2次突发冲塔无疑会强烈刺激到习近平的神经,加速他精神的崩溃。 因为拥有一切,所以反而最不能容忍失去,尤其是随着生命的丧失,能够享受的这一切都会随之飞灰湮灭,所以威胁到人身安全的一切,都必须彻底扼杀在萌芽内。 因此,独裁者就成了全天下最怕死、最胆小的人。 这种突发的冲塔事件发生,会像「女神异闻录5」里的设定那样,击溃习近平心理上一道原本认知为「安全」的底线,从而让已经神经质的他,更加惶惶不可终日。 早知今日,何必当初。

👍1

Signed sona Per

11 Mar 2024, 05:41 UTC88 viewsread 10 August 2026

#记录心情 “我向往民主,我的思想更先进”是很多向往民主的人给自己施加的魔咒。 民主与独裁的区别在于,民主体制中每个人都分享管理国家的权力,所以向往民主的本质其实也是渴望权力。 既然都是渴望权力,在这一点上,那其实就和习近平渴望终生独裁的本质是一样。 既然基于同样的渴望,向往民主的人其实可以大大方方承认,我们就是想要习近平的权力,我们希望这个权力同样能被我们分享。 这种思想本身既不先进、也不文明,它就是一种非常朴素根治于每个人心底的人性。 所以民主人士不用觉得自己清高,也不用给自己戴上道德的枷锁,更不用老是带着一种自我优越感去看待小粉红和体制内人士。 大家都是为了争取自己的权力而赤膊在烂泥地里争斗,这就是事实。在此之上,没有更高级的东西了。

Signed sona Per

6 Mar 2024, 09:26 UTC73 viewsread 10 August 2026

#记录心情 我刚刚看YouTube某个视频的封面,突然产生了很强的即视感。在那个即视感里,当我看到那个视频的封面以后不久的某一天,就收到了战争打响的消息。

Signed sona Per

6 Mar 2024, 09:05 UTC62 viewsread 10 August 2026

#记录心情 李强不召开记者会,一方面是觉得不想演了,一方面是觉得反正被问的问题也答不上来。 很多人把这个看成是皇权回收相权的标志,我只能说观察之缺乏洞察力,怕不是在装外宾。 李克强有相权吗?毛泽东、邓小平当皇帝的时期,谁握着相权? 中共从来就没有皇权相权之争。中共一直以来都只有个人独裁和略微偏一点点寡头独裁这两种方式,没有相权代表的文官集团势力。 中共从诞生一开始,就是超越封建王朝之上的左倾极端意识形态组织。

Signed sona Per

4 Mar 2024, 04:19 UTC61 viewsread 10 August 2026

#记录心情 台湾的《周处除三害》和香港的《树大招风》基本上算是同样题材的电影。 台湾表现的是杀伐果断,人性复杂向善和因缘际会下终成善果。 香港表现的是人性复杂向恶,风云际会却最终求而不得。 都是好电影,但是看完以后的感叹却截然不同。

Signed sona Per

29 Feb 2024, 03:39 UTC66 viewsread 10 August 2026

#记录心情 这两年我听到的最傻逼最弱智最矫情的一句话就是“抱歉占用了公共资源”。 说这句话的人不明白2个基本事实: 1、每个人都有权利使用公共资源,因为这些资源是“公共”的,而每个人都是组成“公共”的一部分,所以公共资源原本就是用来被每一个人占用的。 2、你没那么了不起,你并不能自己想去占用公共资源,就能真的占用。你只是因为某些事被动地站在了聚光灯下,不要把一个自己完全被动的事实扭曲成自己主动选择的结果。 不要说你做不到,习近平每天霸占各种媒体的头版头条,他都做不到,因为公众任何时候都可以选择不看。

Signed sona Per

29 Feb 2024, 00:33 UTC59 viewsread 10 August 2026

#记录心情 很高兴看到有华人能够通过一个渠道告诉全世界极端左倾的代表共产主义在中国做过的事。 在大的框架下,我不觉得美国会被共产主义颠覆,但是我还是希望美国能够尽快走出左倾主义的阴影,这样对整个全世界都有好处。

Signed sona Per

29 Feb 2024, 00:25 UTC57 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1762392782810083746?s=12&t=tsErOZ7Ekr1-SIcRsmjnHg

Signed sona Per

28 Feb 2024, 01:52 UTC49 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

#记录心情 很多人反对中共,但是却喜欢跟着中共热爱的话术体系走。 比如前段时间很多反共人士都在批评王志安,于是愿意帮王志安站台的人为了抨击对手,就频繁用到了“轮系”这个词。 那么我不禁想问:什么叫轮系? 是法轮功信徒自己创办的自媒体?还是法轮功组织创办的新闻媒体?还是接受了法轮功组织资金的自媒体或专业媒体机构? 如果是受到了资金资助,这个资金是法轮功组织出的算轮系,还是法轮功信徒个人出钱资助了,就算轮系?如果是法轮功信徒个人打赏了某个自媒体,那算不算轮系? 所以到底怎么才能算“轮系”,并不重要,重要的是“轮系”这个概念就需要保持十分广义的外延,同时它的内涵又需要糅合“愚昧”、“谎言”,还要加上立场是“反共”。 这样的一个词汇,天生就适合用来扣帽子,而最喜欢扣帽子的就是中共。 所以中共对于“轮系”这个词的泛滥乐见其成,因为先贴标签,然后污名化标签,从而做到打击对手的目的,是中共惯用的手段。 轮系、民运、公知、日本…

👍4

Signed sona Per

26 Feb 2024, 05:49 UTC43 viewsread 10 August 2026

#记录心情 听说中共正在摸查推特上关注了李老师的翻墙用户,如果用户关注了李老师,又暴露了自己的真实信息,就可能被公安叫去喝茶。 我虽然没有关注李老师,但是推特每天都会自动给我推荐他的推文,所以对我而言,中共这种方式是完全不奏效的。 所以我知道这件事后,第一反应不是害怕,而是觉得这又是中共快要垮台的一个例证。 首先,中共为什么不是所有反共账号的粉丝都排查,而是只以李老师为中心去下手?答案其实很简单,那就是没钱。因为没钱就不可能有足够的人力,所以只能以李老师为中心,企望做到杀鸡儆猴。 其次,论影响力李老师也并不是最大的,中共只有有限的钱,为什么选李老师而不是文昭?因为哪怕是在国安方面,中共也并不专业。 要知道,一件事要做得专业,用最少的成本获得最大的成果,这本身就要求管理者具备钻研的精神,而不是傻大憨粗的搞摸底排查。 但在中共体制的大环境里,具有办实事精神的人能够出头的可能性一定是低于正常环境的。 无能的管理者负责的…

Signed sona Per

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mzzyyz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“民主、自由与宅” (@mzzyyz), 66 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mzzyyz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.