3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 288–289 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 17:38
288
-1
8 Aug 2026, 08:18
289
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:53
289
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 20 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
439 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5386536829166063268
127
28.9%
custom 5348486738933214586
121
27.6%
custom 5395747760194490736
54
12.3%
custom 5280848683422739644
46
10.5%
🍓
31
7.06%
custom 5318973407302275881
21
4.78%
custom 5280815698073903144
17
3.87%
❤🔥
11
2.51%
custom 5280713563751605426
9
2.05%
❤
2
0.456%
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 439reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2026 to 13 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 15 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mysweetsloves. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 March 2026 to 13 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
Светлой Пасхи!🪺
Команда My Sweets поздравляет вас с этим тёплым и светлым праздником.
Пусть в вашем доме царят уют, радость и любовь, а каждый день будет наполнен счастьем и гармонией! 🪹🥚
ярмарка для my sweets 🥨
Первая ярмарка стала для нас мощным уроком. Мы старались продумать все, но одного не учли…
Наши крендельки разлетятся так быстро, что не всем желающим хватило💗
В этот раз мы берём в два раза больше. Буквально. Чтобы каждый, кто подойдёт к нашему столику, ушёл с самыми вкусными крендельками🥰
Вас ждет:
✨Больше малиновой посыпки
✨Больше стаканчиков
✨Больше улыбок и хруста
📍13 апреля. Приходите.…
Мы каждый день посыпаем крендельки малиной. А задумывались ли вы, что скрывается за этой маленькой красной кислинкой?🍓
⭐️В древности малина была белой. По греческому мифу, нимфа Ида собирала ягоды, чтобы успокоить плачущего маленького Зевса, и до крови оцарапала руки о шипы. С тех пор малина стала красной .
⭐️Дикую малину называли «медвежьей ягодой» - косолапые были её главными конкурентами . Первый крупный малинник…
😭«печаль - это когда съел последний кренделек my sweets»
📌Хорошая новость: они не исчезают навсегда. И это отличный повод заказать ещё одну порцию. Или две🤍
⭐️ узнать цену, заказать или оставить отзыв ⭐️
🐾2 апреля - день хорька🐾
Маленькие, шустрые, любопытные - хорьки напоминают нам, что иногда полезно быть немного непоседой и радоваться мелочам♥️
Чем ещё хороши хорьки?
Они любят уют, вкусно поесть и тащить в норку всё, что плохо лежит. Если честно, мы их прекрасно понимаем 🤩
В этот день предлагаем перенять у хорьков лучшее:
✨быть активными, но не забывать про перерывы на сладкое
✨искать радость в маленьких вещах
✨…
что едят на орбите? 🚀
🎀Когда мы думаем о космосе, перед глазами появляются скафандры, невесомость и бесконечная чернота. Но у космонавтов есть и маленькие радости - например, сладости.
⬇️
Да-да, на орбите тоже едят вкусненькое. И это целая наука🩷
🔤Шоколад без крошек
Обычный шоколад в невесомости - плохая идея. Крошки разлетаются, попадают в приборы и могут натворить бед. Поэтому для космонавтов разработали специальн…
👍 HARRY POTTER👊
Если вы росли на книгах и фильмах о мальчике, который выжил, то наверняка помните: мир волшебников - это не только магия, палочки и битвы. Это ещё и невероятно вкусные, странные и запоминающиеся сладости.
👦Предлагаем окунуться в воспоминания!
⚡Шоколадные лягушки
Карточка известного волшебника внутри и шоколад, который… ну, вы поняли. Прыгает. В детстве мы мечтали собрать всю коллекцию, а сейчас хот…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @mysweetsloves. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
своя ассоциация , которую напишу в комментариях 🤩3%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2026 to 13 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 993,980 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@mysweetsloves named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@mysweeeets named in 3 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@mysweeeeets named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MY SWEETS” (@mysweetsloves), 288 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mysweetsloves.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.