Channel
@mystyleisme
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
546subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001514660522 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mystyleisme |
| Description | Здесь ты найдешь: ✅актуальные подборки; ✅полезные рекомендации; ✅идеи стильных образов. Персональный стилист Юлия Семёнова @julianikos Переодену так, что изменится жизнь 💯 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mystyleisme |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 546 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 546 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 25 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (25 October 2025 – 24 July 2026) |
| Views total | 210 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
97 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 36 | 37.1% | |
| ❤ | 34 | 35.1% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 12.4% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 5.15% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 4.12% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 3.09% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 2.06% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 25 October 2025 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Предупреждаю, что присутствует мат, т.к записывала для личных сообщений. Слишком чувствительным - не слушать☝🏻 Если будет интересно, могу почаще записывать здесь подкасты.
😁3🔥2❤1
Недавно получила от клиентки такой вопрос. Хочу дальше поделиться своим ответом. Думаю, многим будет актуально послушать⤵️
Video, posted without a caption
👍4🔥4❤1😱1
Огромная ответственность — работать с человеком, который приходит не за преображением, а за ощущением опоры. Ирина долгое время старалась быть незаметной. Из-за худобы её постоянно критиковали, комментировали внешность. Никто не упускал возможность спросить, не болеет ли она. А после ситуации с коллегой, который силой переступил грань дозволенного, она начала одеваться так, чтобы от неё «все отстали». И, наверное,…
❤3🔥3🤩1
Я тут заметила, что «минимализмом» называют всё что угодно — кроме того, что действительно к нему относится. Кажется, что минимализм — это про отсутствие деталей. Достаточно надеть водолазку с джинсами — и всё, «я в минимализме». На самом деле это просто набор базовых вещей без выраженной идеи. Минимализм — не про упрощение ради удобства. За этим визуальным спокойствием и сдержанностью стоит, по сути, ювелирная раб…
👏3❤1🔥1
На мне: Кардиган Moschino чокер Christian Dior от @strogovintage Топ с подтяжками @asyasemyonova_official Казаки @mango Брюки кожаные винтаж
🔥7❤3🤩1
Благодарна Модному Приговору за возможность работать с человеком широкой души, роскошной женщиной и талантливой актрисой💜 На Кристине Бабушкиной: Удлиненный пиджак и колье из стекла @viadolorosa_vintage Юбка с вышивкой из бисера @cois Рубашка и юбка макси @chule_rodnoye Браслет и колье с лезвием @sexyfishjewelry Чокер Justine Clenquet от @modbrand_ru Ph @VRedkina
🔥10❤2👏2
Образ, в котором моя героиня спустя неделю после участия в проекте встретила свою любовь💜 Юлия пришла за тем, чтобы почувствовать себя красивой и желанной женщиной, привлекать правильных мужчин в свою жизнь. И результат не заставил себя долго ждать😁 Мне кажется, все видно по походке и взгляду. Всегда радуюсь, когда преображение, действительно, помогает изменить жизнь 💜
❤16👏7🥰5🔥3
Летом стилизовала масштабную съёмку. Хочу поделиться частью образов. Model: @anitaagloss Photo: @tserevitinov Style: @julianikos @galinaes Muah: @svetlana_stiven
❤7🔥6
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @mystyleisme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@mystyleisme named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Julianiko.s | твой стиль - это ты” (@mystyleisme), 546 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mystyleisme.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.