Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mysterio Calls

Channel

Mysterio Calls

@mysterio_calls

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,044subscribers

-304 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002042962221
TypeChannel
Username@mysterio_calls
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mysterio_calls

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,0449,3489,1967 August 2026 — 9,348 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,348 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,323 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,307 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,276 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,259 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,242 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,214 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,180 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,156 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,132 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,092 subscribers12 September 2026 — 9,067 subscribers16 September 2026 — 9,044 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net -304. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,998–9,394 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 03:409,044-23
12 Sept 2026, 20:169,067-25
9 Sept 2026, 01:199,092-40
4 Sept 2026, 03:569,132-24
1 Sept 2026, 01:059,156-24
29 Aug 2026, 02:059,180-34
26 Aug 2026, 00:369,214-28
22 Aug 2026, 19:339,242-17
19 Aug 2026, 12:129,259-17
16 Aug 2026, 14:449,276-31
13 Aug 2026, 00:299,307-16
10 Aug 2026, 08:229,323-25
7 Aug 2026, 12:479,348no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:389,348first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.34%
avg views ÷ 9,044 subscribers
Avg views / post
302
1 post measured
Reaction rate
15.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 July 202525 August 2026)
Views total302
Reactions total47
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

264 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15859.8%
👍5721.6%
🔥3412.9%
🐳155.68%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 264 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2025 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mysterio_calls. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2025 to 25 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Jan 2026, 20:33 UTC≈2,330 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026

JUST uploaded one of my first reels back in a while… Show it some live, more to come 🔥 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DT04_2Yj0v8/?igsh=eTRwZHFtcWJobXp2

4

25 Sept 2025, 03:19 UTC≈4,120 views20 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

PAID OUT GIVEAWAY WINNER 🔥 Make sure to engage with my reels for a chance to win some free SOL. More to come 💯

🔥106👍4

24 Sept 2025, 02:57 UTC≈3,650 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026

MORE ON MY THESIS: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DO-AvzEDFWQ/?igsh=MXZzanJuYXd4YnlpNQ== ENGAGE with the video for a chance to win FREE SOL ‼️🚨

5

24 Sept 2025, 02:54 UTC≈3,250 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

APED BIG INTO $GRODT on SOL. 7M MC Huge narrative with crazy backing behind... Every hustler has the mindset of getting rich or die trying. I think this runs to multi Ms and my targets are 30m+. More of my thesis coming in an IG reel shortly but for now here is the CA. 6V4QLouv2HTbae34hBjLgW5Qc3kdquqFLBsDS3scR1CH

7👍2

27 Aug 2025, 10:38 UTC≈2,900 views45 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026

who’s ready for another play?

30👍11🐳4

7 Aug 2025, 06:53 UTC≈3,780 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026

GdZEGK9Dv61EbpJ8fYnJZcnJvmhwF6uS6mVVkSfSbonk

9

7 Aug 2025, 06:52 UTC≈3,600 views10 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Photo

$YAGI just broke out past ATHs.. 2x so far and much more to go, don’t be sidelined.

7🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mysterio_calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Meraki
@meraki · 22,086
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 September 2026
Gcalls
@gcalls · 49,351
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 25 August 2026
Wulf Calls
@wulfcryptocalls · 28,554
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 September 2026
Lyxe’s Journal
@cryptolyxecalls · 55,236
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
Shinobi Signals
@ShinobiSignals · 32,532
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 4 September 2026
MemeCoin Whale Pumps
@MemeCoin_Whale_Pumps · 112,593
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
Crypto Taha Free Group
@CryptoTaha11 · 28,691
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
💎SHIFTER CALLS (FREE)💎
@SHIFTERFREECALLS · 25,581
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 September 2026
S2T by Lennart 📊
@freesignalstotradebyLennart · 21,663
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 23 September 2026
Zin Trades
@CryptoZinTrades · 40,569
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
The Real World Tate
@thecobratate · 56,699
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 25 August 2026
🎯Lyxe’s Degen🎯
@lyxedegen · 42,080
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
Solana Meme Pump
@SolMemeSignals · 51,640
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 24 August 2026
GS Memecoins (Public)
@degenwar · 23,749
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 September 2026
DADDY TATE CTO
@DADDYTATECTO · 48,616
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 August 2026
Cryptoxnft | Free Crypto & BTC Updates 📈
@cryptoxnfts · 45,903
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
Shmoos Journal ✍️
@shmooscasino · 30,186
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 7 September 2026
CGT ASIAN COMMUNITY
@ChineasswhalesCGT · 35,382
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
Shmoo’s Calls
@shmooscalls · 37,996
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
Crypto Mason
@cryptomasun · 29,280
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mysterio Calls” (@mysterio_calls), 9,044 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mysterio_calls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.