AN JEDEN TRADER, DER NOCH ZWEIFELT 🎯 Du weißt selbst: ✔️ Der Markt wartet nicht. ✔️ Deine Träume auch nicht. 👉 Warum also weiter zögern, wenn du mit uns schon gestern profitabel gewesen wärst Jetzt einsteigen später danken 🔥 📬@S2TSupport

Channel
S2T by Lennart 📊
@freesignalstotradebyLennart
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,663subscribers
-213 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001908009634 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @freesignalstotradebyLennart |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/freesignalstotradebyLennart |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 21,663 | +70 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 21,593 | -4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 21,597 | -8 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 21,605 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 21:37 | 21,607 | -24 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 17:21 | 21,631 | -17 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 21,648 | -14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:33 | 21,662 | +14 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 21,648 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 21,650 | +4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 21,646 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 21,645 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 21,651 | +19 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 21,632 | +9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 21,623 | -16 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 21,639 | -16 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 21,655 | -26 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 21,681 | +3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 21,678 | -20 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 21,698 | first reading |
Engagement
915 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.363%
- avg views ÷ 21,663 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 78.7
- 340 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 353
- of 915 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 915 (7 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 26,743 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 13:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 35m 50s
- Average length
- 20s
Measured directly from 108 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Ein weiterer Beweis für klare Strategien 📊 Der heutige Trade war technisch stark, das Feedback entsprechend deutlich. Wir liefern nicht nur Signale wir liefern Verständnis 🎯 Wenn du noch zweifelst, verpasst du den nächsten Einstieg 📈 ✉️ Jetzt Zugang sichern: @S2TSupport
Sehr zufrieden mit der gesamten Erfahrung. Analyse, Kommunikation und Struktur entsprechen genau dem, was ich suche. 📈
🔥 GBP/JPY Prognose: Britisches Pfund konsolidiert über dem 50-Tage-EMA – Händler peilen 219.00 an 🔥 Das Währungspaar GBP/JPY setzt seine solide Verfestigung fort und festigt seine Position oberhalb des wichtigen 50-Tage-EMA. Trotz zwischenzeitlicher Schwankungen signalisiert die aktuelle Marktstruktur, dass die Bullen weiterhin das Ruder fest in der Hand halten und sich auf den nächsten dynamischen Schub vorbereite…
Viele jagen nur schnelle Profite... doch langfristiger Erfolg mit Struktur und dem richtigem Riskmanagement ist viel wichtiger! Gestern haben wir wieder ordentlich verdient 💰 Aber nicht durch Glück sondern durch perfektes Timing, klare Planung und gutes Risikomanagement. Und das Beste daran ist. Du bekommst solche Trades kostenlos in diesem FREE Channel. In der VIP Gruppe bekommst du täglich 4-6 Signale. Kein Abo.…
Du findest unsere Bewertungen mittlerweile auf mehreren Plattformen. Überzeuge dich selbst. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 🔜Trust index 🔜Google profile 🔜Proven expert 🔜Trustami Schreib mir Nachricht wenn du loslegen willst 👉@S2TSupport
Photo, posted without a caption
TP2 HIT 🔥
Schreibe mir jetzt und ich zeige dir persönlich wie du starten kannst!
Genau wie in meiner Analyse erklärt. Glückwunsch an alle VIP Mitglieder die diesen Trade mitgenommen haben. Da unsere Positionen abgesichert sind ist alles was jetzt kommt reines Bonusgeld. Jetzt einfach Geduldig bleiben 🤝
AUDUSD TP2 HIT ✔️✔️
🚀AUDUSD - BUY🚀 Entry: 0.71235 Stopp-Loss: 0.70985 Take-Profit 1: 0.71355 Take-Profit 2: 0.71485 Take-Profit 3: 0.71985 📊3:1 Risk Reward 📊
Showing the 12 most recent of 915 posts we hold for @freesignalstotradebyLennart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
An alle angeschlossenen Member: Wie gut profitierst du mit dem Copytrading ❓
- 💵💵💵45%
- 💵💵30%
- 💵24%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
An jeden, der angeschlossen ist: Wieviel Profit konntest du diese Woche machen?
- 💵💵💵52%
- 💵💵26%
- 💵22%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
An alle: Wie gut lief die Woche bis jetzt für euch?
- 💵💵💵46%
- 💵💵35%
- 💵19%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Wieviel konntest du bis jetzt diese Woche profitieren?
- 💵💵💵48%
- 💵💵30%
- 💵22%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Wie lief eure Woche mit S2T bisher?
- 💵💵💵48%
- 💵💵27%
- 💵25%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Wenn du angeschlossen bist: Wieviel konntest du bereits mit uns profitieren ❓
- 💵💵💵53%
- 💵💵27%
- 💵20%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 915 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@fxstofficial · 5,535#1
@PowerTradingGlobalPTG · 3,613#2
@DEtradefxSignals · 16,129#3
@FreeTWUgroup · 5,067#4
@evorextrading · 501#5
@KryptoGuruDACH · 1,317#6
@GoldmanTradesFree · 919#7
@theprofessorslab · 1,333#8
@bengoldtrader · 354,398#9
@TradingCoachOli · 4,601#10
@zenithcapitaltrading · 1,430#11
@Suissetradingfree · 4,762#12
@freemiumtradeideas · 1,831#13
@CRYPTOGOLDGAINER · 1,925#14
@elitetrading_signals · 16,530#15
@michael_smarttrader_de · 193#16
@KKAnnouncements · 2,263#17
@CryptoTradingGermanBulls · 1,100#18
@news_enthuellt · 274#19
@KombiKanal · 290 (as read 23 September 2026)#20
@financial_insider24 · 349#21
@smartscalpfxinternational · 4,138#22
@AiForexE · 546#23
@lucasmetzlercryptoanalysen · 490#24
@MajorThorstenJansen · 11,566#25
@astrozeit · 1,468#26
@tradingtimde · 7,198#27
@coinfliptvcryptonews · 618 (as read 23 September 2026)#28
@teresasnetworkinput · 2,150#29
@alexandr_malkevich · 56,377#30
@OliMPZahlen · 856 (as read 23 September 2026)#31
@bear007 · 66,027#32
@VTVplusHerson · 2,875#33
@MarSeme · 332#34
@zylofxtrading · 648#35
@investor1992Iam · 597#36
@autozavod · 25,612#37
@ZFMradio · 1,689 (as read 23 September 2026)#38
@Emeis_oi_Anthropoi · 1,128#39
@dein_caelum · 3,452#40
@buy_sell_hold_trade · 1,203#41
@foresignal_com · 4,203#42
@jeraspglobal · 269 (as read 23 September 2026)#43
@ton_get_free · 245 (as read 23 September 2026)#44
@mysterio_calls · 9,044#45
@DogInCatrix · 100 (as read 23 September 2026)#46
@mosmosru · 101,277#47
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@mosmosru · 101,277
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
@autozavod · 25,612
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“S2T by Lennart 📊” (@freesignalstotradebyLennart), 21,663 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/freesignalstotradebyLennart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.