Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𐌑ыᥴ᧘ᥙ нᥲᥰᥙᥴᥲнныᥱ ᥰᥱρ᧐ⲙ

@mysliperom

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

424subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002511003215
TypeChannel
Username@mysliperom
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mysliperom

Growth

4246 Aug 2026, 22:03 — 424 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:12 — 424 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:037 Aug 2026, 13:12
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 423–425 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 13:12424no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:03424first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
165.0%
avg views ÷ 424 subscribers
Avg views / post
700
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 March 20262 August 2026)
Views total4,197
Reactions total106
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

261 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10540.2%
💯5721.8%
👍5019.2%
🔥3011.5%
💔114.21%
🤝83.07%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 261reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mysliperom. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 March 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC107 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Пусть Аллах сохранит вас всех на благе, о мусульмане.

11👍3🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 18:22 UTC300 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

➡️«Суть существования человека и секрет его сотворения в этой жизни — осуществление всего поклонения Аллаху, посвящая его Единому Ему, Могуч Он и Возвышен». 👤Ахмад ибн Умар аль-Хазими, да сохранит его Аллах на благе.

10🔥3💯1

25 Jul 2026, 23:51 UTC≈1,900 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Представь, брат мой, ты призываешь людей к единобожию, однако Аллах не дарует тебе победы и содействия в этом деле, а напротив, сделает так, что многобожники возьмут верх над тобой в то время, когда ты являешься единобожником и приближенным к Аллаху. И ведь если такое произойдет, то это либо может быть испытанием от Аллаха, как подвергались подобному испытанию и пророки, мир им, либо результатом твоих грехов и непосл

🔥9💯5👍41💔1

22 Jul 2026, 21:31 UTC≈1,130 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Слыша и видя, как между мусульманами происходит смута, открываются двери зла, через которые к ним заходят такие гости, как зависть, злорадство и гордыня, не говоря уже о злословии, предательстве и лжи. Хочу озвучить свою мысль: Помогай своему брату-сунниту, даже если он грешен, и радуйся за него, испрашивая благодати в его делах у Господа Великого. Пусть зависть и злоба овладевают людьми неверия и ереси, видя, как а

9👍5🔥3🤝3

15 Jul 2026, 19:50 UTC595 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Заметил такое явление, что когда пытаешься указать человеку на его ошибку или объяснить, что мусульманину не следует поступать так или обнародовать недопустимые вещи, его окружение начинает обвинять тебя в грубости или в том, что не стоило говорить вовсе. При этом они, возможно, лучше понимают недопустимость таких поступков, но предпочитают молчать. Видимо, дружба у них крепкая ) или существуют взаимовыгодные интерес

💯158👍3💔2

11 Jul 2026, 23:07 UTC544 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Не относись к грехам легкомысленно, ведь один грех может привести к другому. Как только открывается дверь другого греха, предыдущий грех становится уже незначительным. Так, шаг за шагом, человек может дойти до самого неверия. Ведь ранее имамы подчеркивали, что ослушания Аллаха являются предпосылкой неверия.

💔43💯3

10 Jul 2026, 11:12 UTC≈1,370 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🎤У каждого, наверняка, бывает такое состояние, когда он видит у своих братьев или сестёр успех в разных полезных делах: в сфере уроков, призыва, перевода книг и тому подобное. И, видя подобное, зачастую сразу может закрадываться в сердце зависть. Вот этот момент — самый важный, поскольку это точка отправления, от которой зависит дальнейшее твоё отношение к этому брату или сестре, в зависимости от того, как ты справля

7👍1💔1💯1🔥1

10 Jul 2026, 10:53 UTC335 views3 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Язык который лжёт и лжесвидетельствует, является бесполезным органом, в ампутации его больше пользы нежели чем в сохранении.

🔥3

21 Jun 2026, 21:38 UTC≈1,500 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Как то было сказано Ибрахиму ибн Адхаму, да помилует его Аллах, что мясо подорожало, на что он ответил: «Так удешевите его» то есть: не покупайте его. Это указывает на то, что когда Аллах делает так, что всё дорожает, то человек если покупал ранее в чём не было такой необходимости, оставляет, что следовательно может это действие привести к дешевизне этой вещи. И конечно в первую очередь следует помнить о том, что

5👍4

17 Jun 2026, 23:07 UTC397 views12 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Если пришла грусть и печаль, то начни читать Коран без промедления, и ты почувствуешь, как Аллах отдалит от тебя эти качества, что возможно тебя одолевали.

7👍5

7 Jun 2026, 22:25 UTC727 views12 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

«Когда-то в прошлом дядя Магомед воспитывал настоящих мужчин, следуя манерам, достойным горца. Он учил своих женщин знать своё место, и чтобы не вмешивались в мужские дела, гордо носил свою папаху. Но сегодня дядя Магомед позабыл о чести, мужестве и благородстве своих предков. Он оказался в окружении женщин, ведя их, как пастух, на поля, луга и горы, выражая свою радость вслух. Ушло имя знать и честь, уступив место н

👍9🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mysliperom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 334,197 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𐌑ыᥴ᧘ᥙ нᥲᥰᥙᥴᥲнныᥱ ᥰᥱρ᧐ⲙ” (@mysliperom), 424 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mysliperom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.