Channel
@myshlenie_plus
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
327subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002179064513 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @myshlenie_plus |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/myshlenie_plus |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 327 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:19 | 326 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 326 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (20 May 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 47 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
80 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 40 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 23.8% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 16.3% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 6.25% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 2.50% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мы очень часто ждём момента, когда наконец станет понятно, как правильно. Вот только в бизнесе этот момент может не наступить никогда. Информации всегда будет недостаточно. Будут риски, сомнения, противоречивые сигналы, несколько возможных вариантов. И ни одного, про который можно честно сказать: «точно сработает». И вот здесь начинается самое интересное. Потому что неопределённость проверяет не только нашу стратег…
🔥4❤1
СИСТЕМА vs ХАОС Как перестать тушить пожары и построить систему, которая растёт Бывает ощущение, что бизнес стал вашей тюрьмой? Вы работаете больше всех. Принимаете решения по каждому вопросу. Тушите пожары вместо того, чтобы развивать компанию. А рост упирается в потолок — и непонятно, почему. 👉 Дело не в том, что вы или ваша команда работаете плохо. Дело в том, что система управления, которая работала на старте,…
🔥3❤2👍1🤩1
Photo, posted without a caption
Почему в паре деньги либо растут, либо начинают застревать? Когда в паре перестают расти деньги, дело далеко не всегда в доходе, экономике или выбранной стратегии. Очень часто деньги становятся зеркалом тех процессов, которые происходят между мужчиной и женщиной. Если деньги оказываются перегружены смыслом, то они перестают быть просто ресурсом. Они начинают означать любовь, безопасность, признание, власть, свободу…
👍1🙏1
📆 В четверг 16.07, в 19:00 протестируем новый формат, встречу Лиги проведем ОНЛАЙН, присоединяйтесь к нам, будем качать! Сейчас перекину анонс 👇
Как дела?
The shares total 184%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤2
Привет всем 👋 Месяц ушёл в другую реальность: ЕГЭ дочки, выпускной, выбор вуза. Пока мы ещё в процессе — искренне переживаем, обсуждаем, ищем что подходит (бюджетные места отменили по тем направлениям которые выбрали осенью).🤪 Поэтому здесь было тихо. Возвращаюсь. А у вас как дела? Что происходит в вашей жизни и бизнесе этим летом?
🔥2
Помнишь, как всё начиналось? Ты тогда горел. Даже если было страшно — ты чувствовал, зачем это делаешь. Была ясность, энергия. Смысл... А что сейчас? Вроде бы всё «хорошо»: — бизнес работает, — команда есть, — доход стабилен, бывает и заносит… Но внутри — пустота. Или тяжесть, или ощущение: «Я снова делаю то же самое, но уже не знаю — зачем?» Ты увяз в операционке, в рутине, в бесконечных решениях, которые не вд…
❤4👍3🔥2
Большинство людей никогда не связывают свои отношения с клиентами и отношения с близкими. Хотя очень часто это одна и та же история. Если вам сложно говорить «нет» близким людям — скорее всего, будет сложно отказывать клиентам. Если есть страх разочаровать партнёра — будет страшно поднимать цены. Если привычно заслуживать любовь и одобрение — продажи могут превращаться в попытку понравиться. Если сложно выдержив…
❤3🔥3👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥3
Работаю с предпринимательницей. Внешне проблема выглядела вполне бизнесовой: — Падение прибыли. — Убыточные позиции. — Изменение правил рынка. — Высокая неопределённость. — Необходимость принимать сложные решения. Казалось бы, нужно разбирать стратегию, цифры и бизнес-модель. Но чем глубже мы смотрели, тем интереснее становилась картина. Практически за каждым её переживанием обнаруживалось одно и то же чувство: В…
🔥4❤2👍2
Масштаб личности и масштаб бизнеса напрямую связаны со способностью человека выдерживать неопределённость. Потому что чем больше становится бизнес — тем меньше "гарантий". Больше ответственности. Больше давления. Больше неизвестных. Больше сложных решений. Больше ситуаций, где невозможно всё просчитать заранее. И в какой-то момент предприниматель начинает упираться не в рынок. А в собственную способность выдержив…
👍2🔥2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @myshlenie_plus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как дела?
The shares total 184%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Алхимия результата | Михаил Паршиков” (@myshlenie_plus), 327 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/myshlenie_plus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.