3 measurements taken within a single day, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 934–941 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Sept 2026, 00:41
940
+5
13 Sept 2026, 03:22
935
no change
13 Sept 2026, 02:47
935
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.6%
avg views ÷ 940 subscribers
Avg views / post
231
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026
Posts held
17 (27 July 2026 – 5 September 2026)
Views total
1,386
Reactions total
84
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Sept 2026, 03:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
344 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👌
160
46.5%
👍
79
23.0%
❤
69
20.1%
👏
17
4.94%
🙏
14
4.07%
😍
3
0.872%
👎
1
0.291%
🤝
1
0.291%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 344 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✒️
🔲 مدرسه، کارخانهی همشکلسازی
مصطفا آلاحمد
میشل فوکو در کتاب نظارت و تنبیه نشان میدهد که نهادهای مدرن چگونه با سازماندهی زمان، فضا، بدن و سازوکارهای نظارت، انسانهایی منضبط و قابلکنترل تولید میکنند. مدرسه یکی از همین کارخانههای بزرگِ انسانسازی و یکسانسازی (الیناسیون) است.
در آموزش استبدادی از همان روزهای نخست به کودک میگویند چه بپوشد، چگونه بنشیند، چه زمانی بایستد، چه زمانی سکوت کند، حتی برای رفتن به …
✒️
بودن یا نبودن
مصطفا آلاحمد
در این صفحه به ندرت و به ضرورت و البته باز هم به عنوان نوعی کنش درباره خودم نوشتهام. در متن زیر نیز در میان خطوط تلاشم نوعی روشنگریست.
من در این جنگ، تهران ماندهام، زیرا میخواستم در شهرم باشم، در کنار دیگر همشهریهایم، در کنار برخی اعضای خانوادهام، در کنار مادرم و در کنار دوستانم که ماندهاند، دوستانی بهتر از آب روان...
چیزی برای از دست دادن ندارم، زیرا آن چه اندک سرمایه مادی بود…
✒️
🔲 ارثیه اجباری (آلاحمد بودن)
مصطفا آلاحمد
از وقتی یادم میآید و از دوران نوجوانی همواره با این پرسش روبرو بودهام که نسبت من با جلال آلاحمد چیست؟ مخاطبین عزیزی نیز همین پرسش را بارها در کامنتها پرسیدهاند. به شخصه خودم هرگاه با کسانی روبرو شدم که با افراد سرشناس، تشابه اسمی داشتند، هرگز کنجکاو نبودم که چه نسبتی با آن فرد دارند. اگر چه میتوانم این کنجکاوی را درک کنم، اما همیشه فکر کردم فامیل و قوم و خویش، ر…
✒️
🔲 ایدئولوژی مرگ (Necro-ideology)
قسمت ششم: نگرهی آخرالزمانی
مصطفا آلاحمد
همانگونه که پیشتر نوشتهام، واژهی «ایدئولوژی» در مجموعهی این جستارها صرفاً به معنای دستهای از باورها نیست؛ بلکه به دستگاهی از ارزشها و قوانین اجتماعی گفته میشود که در ساختار قدرت شکل میگیرند و در خدمت حفظ منافع طبقهی حاکم هستند. این قوانین الزاماً بازتاب واقعیت نیستند، بلکه به طور معمول بر پایهی پندارهای دروغینی شکل میگیرند ک…
✒️
🔲 توهم رهبری سیاسی
مصطفا آلاحمد
در سیاست، محبوبیت هرگز جای دانش، تجربه و شایستگی را نمیگیرد. هنرپیشهها، آوازخوانان، سلبریتیها و دیگر چهرههای محبوب، به واسطهی دیدهشدن و کاریزما، میتوانند توجه افکار عمومی را به مسائل سیاسی و اجتماعی جلب و حساسیتهایی ایجاد کنند. اما، شهرت به تنهایی نه دانش سیاسی میآفریند و نه صلاحیت رهبری.
اگرچه در مواردی انگشتشمار، برخی چهرههای هنری وارد عرصهی سیاست شدهاند، اما موفقی…
✒️
🔲 سینمای مردانه
مصطفا آلاحمد
پس از انقلاب «زن، زندگی، آزادی»، شماری از بازیگران زن سینمای ایران دیگر حاضر نشدند زیر قواعد حجاب اجباری به فعالیت حرفهای خود ادامه دهند. آنان نمیخواستند در آثاری بازی کنند که حتی در خصوصیترین فضاهای زندگی، شخصیتهای فیلم با پوششی تصویر میشوند که نه تنها با واقعیت همخوان نیست، بلکه بازتولید دروغی است که محصول اجبار حکومتی است.
بازیگرانی چون ترانه علیدوستی، کتایون ریاحی، هنگامه ق…
✒️
🔲 تلفن سفید، دیکتاتوری سیاه
مصطفا آلاحمد
در دههی سی میلادی، زمانی که ایتالیا زیر سایهی فاشیسم، نفس میکشید، سینمایی شکل گرفت که تلاش میکرد «واقعیت» را از چشم مردم پنهان کند. سینمایی که مشکلات طاقتفرسای مردم در سلطهی دیکتاتوری موسیلینی را زیر فرش جارو میکرد و صحنهها و زندگیهایی را نشان میداد که بدون هیچ دغدغهای بود. گویی مردم ایتالیا شادترین و ثروتمندترین مردم دنیا هستند. این سینما به سینمای «تلفن سف…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @myopponentthought. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
متافیزیک سینرژی @astro_synergy · 26,159 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اندیشه مخالف من” (@myopponentthought), 940 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/myopponentthought.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.