Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЭТО БАЗА

Channel

ЭТО БАЗА

@mynameisbaza

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

360subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 3 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002088201089
TypeChannel
Username@mynameisbaza
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded3 September 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mynameisbaza

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

360365362.53 September 2026 — 365 subscribers3 September 2026 — 365 subscribers13 September 2026 — 364 subscribers25 September 2026 — 360 subscribers3 September 202625 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 22 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 359–366 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 16:01360-4
13 Sept 2026, 05:59364-1
3 Sept 2026, 16:22365no change
3 Sept 2026, 15:47365first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.9%
avg views ÷ 360 subscribers
Avg views / post
50.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held19 (22 June 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total100
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 16:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

56 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2850.0%
🎉916.1%
🔥814.3%
👍58.93%
😁58.93%
🤩11.79%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 22:37 UTC49 viewsread 3 September 2026

А еще я нахожусь в ступоре/тихом ужасе перед задачей начинать делать контент на англ, но это уже другая история 🔫🔫🔫 Позориться, конечно, не хочется, но что поделать...

2 Sept 2026, 22:34 UTC51 viewsread 3 September 2026

Я осваиваю YouTube и сегодня буквально весь день просидела, мучая сначала Клода, а потом Runway, чтобы в итоге смонтировать 2 минуты. 2, Карл! Вот эта ваша автоматизация, которая должна была всё упростить и сделать за меня, в итоге превратила три минуты видео в шесть часов моей жизни. К вечеру я уже всех и всё на свете прокляла. Я купила стандарт-подписку на Runway, получила 600 кредитов и их хватило примерно на 15…

20 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC68 viewsread 3 September 2026

И сразу второй вопрос: кто-то делал парсеры популярных веток тредс?

20 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC67 viewsread 3 September 2026

Вся лента в каких-то чудесных монтажах от Клода, можете показать хорошие примеры, где он правда монтирует что-то сложнее субтитров?

14 Aug 2026, 22:10 UTC101 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Видели новое лого инсты? Что думаете? Как вам гибрид?

14 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC90 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

После эпохи Aviasales моя любимая связка в сс — Билан и Басков

14 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC85 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Сейчас считаем новое приложение, у него простая механика и совсем юная ца, поэтому я настаиваю на цене 67 🤣

😁3

13 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC81 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Раз уж вышла в эфир поделюсь еще одной радостной микро-новостью! Вчера случилась наша первая холодная продажа в Швеции 😻 Шведский рынок оказался гораздо более консервативным, чем я ожидала. Несмотря на высокий уровень цифровизации, привычные для меня каналы работают заметно менее эффективно. Хотя, справедливости ради, мы пока протестировали лишь небольшую часть гипотез. Пока результаты такие: 😻200 холодных писем →…

👍3

12 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC70 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤3

12 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC69 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026

У нас изначально был очень простой дизайн, но тестируя мы поняли, для молодой аудитории очень важен онбординг. Поэтому в новом обновлении будет добавлена красота!😻

🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC70 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤2

20 Jul 2026, 22:00 UTC124 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026

У нас активно идет фаза теста продукта и интервью. Напомню, что мы делаем приложение для поиска персонала в кафе, бары, отели и рестораны, а значит, показываем готовый продукт и предпринимателям с опытом, и 15-летним ребятам, которые ищут подработку на лето — диапазон пользователей максимально широкий, и это само по себе стресс-тест для интерфейса. Все онлайн-встречи провожу я, все поля (бары и рестораны Швеции) — …

❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @mynameisbaza. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jun 2026, 20:58 UTCAnonymous Poll25 voters

Палитра

  1. 148%
  2. 232%
  3. Никакая20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🔥🔥🔥 ЕДАГДА.САМАРА
@edagdasmr · 34,119
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЭТО БАЗА” (@mynameisbaza), 360 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mynameisbaza.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.