Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Mykhology

@mykhology

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,671subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001034929122
TypeChannel
Username@mykhology
Created23 March 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mykhology

Growth

3,6703,6733,671.55 August 2026 — 3,672 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,672 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,673 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,670 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,671 subscribers3,6715 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,670–3,673 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:033,671+1
9 Aug 2026, 12:413,670-3
6 Aug 2026, 22:323,673+1
6 Aug 2026, 04:333,672no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:323,672first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 28 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.7%
avg views ÷ 3,671 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,160
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (28 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total5,813
Reactions total465
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,166 reactions across 21 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2,166100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,166reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 21:09 UTC363 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кто-то уже пошутил про яблочный спас?

🔥20

3 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC≈1,190 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новый курс начинается совсем скоро! Будет он о том, как не запутаться в католических святых. Или о том, как стать святым. Или о том, зачем их казнить! Словом, обсуждаем католических святых, разбираясь в деталях, распутывая исторические детективы и вникая в тонкости. А тонкостей там предостаточно. И, конечно, подробно разбираемся в том, как и почему святых изображали в западном искусстве. Начинаем во вторник, но не з

🔥37

1 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC≈1,180 views107 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Посмотрел “Одиссею” Нолана. . Обычно я не пишу рецензии на фильмы, которые смотрел, но в этот раз уже несколько слушателей моих лекций попросили меня что-то сказать - как религиоведа, популяризатора истории и т.д, так что запишу коротко свои соображения. Постараюсь без спойлеров, но некоторые неизбежны. Сразу - несколько важных оговорок. Во-первых, я, понятно, не киновед. Во-вторых, я не фанат Нолана, никогда особен

🔥107

1 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC≈1,300 views205 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Третий вопрос: хорошая ли это экранизация Гомера? Коротко говоря, я думаю, что нет. Если мы оцениваем фильм как экранизацию, то он не удался. Думаю я так не потому даже, что фильм далеко отходит от буквы гомеровского текста: это неизбежно, огромную поэму даже в трехчасовой фильм полностью не уместить, и даже лучшая экранизация вынуждена была бы что-то сокращать. Но Нолан - опять-таки, уверен, сознательно, - выбросил

🔥205

21 Jul 2026, 15:24 UTC≈1,780 views96 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Не использую в сегодняшней лекции про ренессансную магию, но просто покажу вам: посмотрите, какая великолепная иллюстрация Марка Шагала к "Буре" Шекспира.

🔥96

16 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC≈2,350 views67 reactionsread 7 August 2026

И раз уж сегодня день анонсов, о поездке: в конце ноября я везу группу в Эфиопию. Кажется, сейчас еще действует скидка: https://morethantravel.co/ethiopia В Эфиопии я был трижды. Страна фантастически интересная, ни на что не похожая, очень красивая, с уникальной христианской традицией и удивительной архитектурой. В общем, более чем стоит того.

🔥67

16 Jul 2026, 05:53 UTC≈2,180 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Карты Таро — это больше, чем просто колода для гадания. За ними скрыта история человеческой культуры: средневековое христианство, философия ренессанса, античная мифология и масонская символика. В новом выпуске «Книжных посиделок» вместе с Константином Михайловым, автором книги «Таро глазами историка», мы поговорим о происхождении карт Таро и смыслах, которые скрыты в образах старших арканов. За самый интересный воп

🔥58

16 Jul 2026, 05:53 UTC≈1,860 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня в 17:00 по Москве буду отвечать на какие-то вопросы про новую книжку и вокруг нее. Если хотите - присоединяйтесь, это бесплатно!

🔥36

15 Jul 2026, 18:30 UTC≈4,390 views196 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Повесточка, кругом повесточка. У Софокла в "Похищении Елены" или у Еврипида в "Троянках" Елену Прекрасную, как положено, играли мужчины в масках и женских нарядах. А в новом фильме Нолана - вы слышали? - Елену сыграет женщина. Бесстыдное потакание современным вкусам!

🔥196

10 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC≈2,660 views118 reactionsread 7 August 2026

(4/4) Могут ли вокруг AI сложиться микроритуалы в духе “для меньшей траты токенов я всегда кладу перед собой кроличью лапку” или “для лучшего результата я всегда называют чат GPT Петром Ивановичем”? Да, это не только очень вероятно, но и, думаю, уже происходит. Может ли AI использоваться в уже существующих религиях? А как же, уверяю вас, масса молодых пасторов уже генерирует проповеди в Клоде. Не будьте, как они, дет

🔥118

10 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC≈2,330 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026

(3/4) Могут ли технологии становиться частью религиозного культа? Да, это бывает. В XIX и XX веке известен ряд примеров, когда развитая технология включалась в культ как элемент. В Пляске духов (лакота и ряд других народов, вторая половина XIX века) предполагалось, что железная дорога может служить мистическим способом распространения власти белых.. В культе Вайлала (Папуа, 1919-1922) была идея, что духи мертвых верн

🔥62

10 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,530 views64 reactionsread 7 August 2026

(2/4) Религии - все на свете, от шаманизма до пятидесятничества, - грубо говоря, нарастают вокруг этого ядра веры в сверхъестественное и нашей психики в целом. Поэтому почти все религии отвечают на некоторые вопросы. Важный момент: это не вопросы этики (масса религий не имеет сложной этики) и не вопросы посмертия (множество религий имеют очень расплывчатые представления о том, что с нами будет потом). Скорее это вопр

🔥64

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @mykhology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 437,322 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mykhology” (@mykhology), 3,671 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mykhology.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.