Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 21 May 2026 to 4 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @mykhailo_kukhar — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,304–4,307 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 18:15
4,304
-1
8 Aug 2026, 20:55
4,305
-2
6 Aug 2026, 04:05
4,307
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:20
4,307
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
32.4%
avg views ÷ 4,304 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,390
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
19 (21 May 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
5,574
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
25s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Шановні колеги!
Якщо Ви розглядаєте вихід на європейський ринок або вже працюєте з міжнародними компаніями, питання вибору юрисдикції рано чи пізно стає стратегічним.
Чехія багато років залишається серед найпопулярніших напрямків для українського бізнесу. Водночас за однаковими податковими ставками можуть стояти зовсім різні правила, витрати та ризики.
5 серпня Future Business Club запрошує Вас на практичну зустрі…
🌍 Де у 2026 році бізнес платить менше податків?
Які країни залишаються найвигіднішими для підприємців та інвесторів? Які податкові зміни вже набули чинності, а які ще попереду?
28 липня о 19.00 (час Києва) на онлайн заході у Future Business Club порівняємо податкові системи різних країн, розберемо реальні кейси та допоможемо зрозуміти, де сьогодні найкращі умови для міжнародного бізнесу.
✅️ Вартість лише 150€
👉 Д…
З ГОРДІСТЮ ПРЕДСТАВЛЯЮ: ВЖЕ ЗА ТИЖДЕНЬ! НЕ ПРОПУСТІТЬ!
Одне з найчастіших звернень: ми прослухали всі 20 лекцій топових податкових консультантів по Європі та оффшорам, що у вас є: а чи можна найкращих з них зібрати разом влаштувати дискусію: ЯКА САМЕ ПОДАТКОВА СХЕМА Є НАЙБІЛЬШ ПОПУЛЯРНОЮ НАДІЙНОЮ ТА ПЕРЕВІРЕНОЮ В 2026 РОЦІ?
Для айті, для виробництва, для маркетингових компаній, для рітейлу?
Ви питаєте — ми відпові…
📘 ANNUAL REPORT 2026
📢 Уперше в історії Annual Report — закрита Executive Q&A з Михайлом Кухарем для всіх власників звіту.
📈 Українська економіка входить у новий цикл розвитку.
Рішення Європейського Союзу щодо фінансування України обсягом €45 млрд змінює фундаментальні макроекономічні параметри країни та формує нову архітектуру економічного зростання на найближчі роки. Для бізнесу це означає перегляд стратегічних…
Європейський центральний банк здобув підтримку парламентського комітету для запуску крипто- євро. Якщо Европарламент не затягне цю справу та проголосує восени — то перше криптоєвро, як і обіцяли ще 5 років назад з`явиться в 2026 році!
А ви в курсі, що зможете тримати і свої гроші в CBDC евросоюзу не відкриваючи рахунок в жодному з європейських банків?
А прийматимуть у вас платежі всі — бо ви тепер клієнт європейськ…
ПРОЧИТАВШИ ЦЮ НОВИНУ, НЕ МІГ ДОЧЕКАТИСЯ ПОКИ У ВАШІНГТОНІ НАСТАНЕ РАНОК...)
Дочекавшись та зробивши кілька дзвінків знайомим республіканським аналітикам, не можу не поділитися тепер з вами висновками, котрі сьогодні почув.
Я, як правило, не коментую політичні і тим більше міжнародні політичні події. Проте прочитавши кілька упереджено-поверхневих коментарів вже сьогодні зранку, не можу не поділитися з вами і іншою т…
ВОЛОДІЄТЕ ВТС? ПЕРЕВІРТЕ СЕБЕ!
"Coinbase виявила 7 млн BTC ($466 млрд), вразливих до квантових атак, більшість яких належить активним користувачам. Звіт опублікувала консультативна рада криптобіржі з квантових обчислень. До неї, зокрема, входять професор Стенфорда Ден Боне та представники Ethereum Foundation. 1,7 млн BTC ($113 млрд) перебувають на 20 тис. застарілих адрес, що використовують P2PK. У них сам відкритий…
Цікаво, яким маршрутом? Тим що свій ще тиждень назад вивезти не могла?
А як щодо санкцій? Ну і щоб двічі не збиратися, тією ж хвилею заборонити і імпорт трансформаторів)
Я не часто особисто анонсую зустрічі в нашому Future Business Club — але Артем Афян — це легенда юриспруденції!
А сімейні трасти та фаундейшени — це легальні внутрішньо-європейські оффшори, котрі використовують ВСІ просунуті європейські бізнеси. Економія податків та рівень захисту від "небажаної публічності" — на порядок вища від традиційних оффшорних юрисдикцій (BVI, Cayman, Cyprus, Dubai). А ось платежі зі Швейцар…
ТИЖНЕВИЙ ОГЛЯД РИНКУ НАФТИ ТА ГАЗУ З НАШОГО РЕГУЛЯРНОГО ПРОДУКТУ WEEKLY Economic Monitor
Газ
У понеділок липневі ф'ючерси на TTF знизились до $535,4 за тис. куб. м (-15,4% за тиждень), спотова ціна — до $538,8 (-14,6%). Тиждень виявився переломним для ринку — оголошення про рамкову мирну угоду між США та Іраном спровокувало найбільше одноденне падіння котирувань з початку конфлікту, хоча питання швидкості відновленн…
Структурні наслідки конфлікту збережуться. ОПЕК вдруге поспіль знизила прогноз зростання світового попиту на нафту у 2026 році — до 970 тис. барелів на добу проти попередніх 1,17 млн. Конфлікт прискорив дискусію щодо надмірної залежності світової торгівлі від єдиного вузького місця: ADNOC, найбільша в північній частині Перської затоки нафтовидобувна компанія, вже прискорює будівництво другого трубопроводу до Фуджейри…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @mykhailo_kukhar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 331,953 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mykhailo Kukhar” (@mykhailo_kukhar), 4,304 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mykhailo_kukhar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.