Channel
@myhsjlsh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
334subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003224905253 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @myhsjlsh |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/myhsjlsh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 334 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:51 | 330 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 330 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 24 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (24 March 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 113 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
14 reactions across 8 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
mmk禾甜·女仆体验馆 @xcmt001 泡泡 颜值：9.3 人照一致，妆容好看，基本不会有落差，最接近的是右下角那张吧，眼睛挺灵动的，看着有点小俏皮。😏 身材：9.3 160左右的身高，胸的话在小B，胸的形状跟手感都是比较好的，乳晕跟乳头都比较小，皮肤是黄偏白，身材没有赘肉，屁股是小翘臀，就是我喜欢的小屁股，咩有发现纹身，。😁 服务态度：9.3 今天出勤的妹妹中一眼就看到了泡泡，本来泡泡是7点出勤，后面商量也是提前过来了，妹妹过来先看一下，颜值方面很满意的，后面就一起簌口，后面不愧是mmk，也是蛇到饱了，妹妹皮肤光滑，全程都是在妹妹身上游走，后面也是一边看综艺一边聊天，时间一下子就过了一个小时，这一段时间真的是一下过去了😉 总结： 9.3 小只，听话，乖，颜值不错，蛇到饱😍。
#福田 #萧薰儿 @midou8887 颜值：9.2 人照一致，素颜小妹妹，基本不会有落差，比上次小小扣一点，脸上长痘痘了，点名批评熬夜打麻将的烂赌婆，爱笑的小妹妹，依旧是逗比小女友，待一起的时候很舒服😏 身材：9.3 162左右的身高，胸的话在小B到B（难道大个了？），乳晕跟乳头都比较小，颜色的话棕色带粉，皮肤是正常的黄色，身材没有赘肉，腿型不错，屁股是小翘臀，就是我喜欢的小屁股，右手有一小块纹身，后背有胎记。😁 服务态度：9.7 这次少有的临时约了薰儿，也是约好刚好到达的时间，顺利上去，薰儿就靠在门等着，进去就坐沙发上，薰儿马上贴贴，薰儿会很快找话题聊起来，这次聊的是上次之后发生的事，也有小小吃瓜的感觉，薰儿眼睛带点笑的，能感觉到她就是在笑，小女友的女友感满满，这次没有准备矿泉水，只能喝小女友的饮料解解渴了😉 性体验： 9.7 这次就简单点，到床上之后小女友想穿那个女仆情趣，不过我没让穿，她搁那搞怪的语气说女仆哦，然后又…
福田 卡戴珊泡泡 @paopao769 前言 很早之前就知道了泡泡，这个脸真的是一见倾心，最早看到的双飞报告也是泡泡跟子玉的，那会就有深刻印象，毕竟泡泡的颜值身材都是一顶一的。😏 颜值：9.5 脸蛋跟七月五号的极其相似，见到泡泡是有股惊艳的感觉的，泡泡的妆容很精致，很好看很好看，身上有纹身，后背会多点，肤色印象不深，印象是黄偏白，还是被脸蛋吸引了😏 身材：9.6 身高感觉有168，胸居然有C到D，摸起来非常非常的软，乳头是小乳头小乳晕，腰腹没什么赘肉，腿是肉腿类型的，最重要的是屁股，这个屁股是真的大，第一次遇到这么大的，上面的那张图就可以看出了，腰臀比非常的诱人，有恐怖的数值😏 服务态度：9.6 去之前就跟泡泡约好时间，昨天晚上超级大雨，可能会晚点也跟泡泡提前说好，后面也是安排好，路上的时候，“你要不要跟我一起吃粉，我叫外卖”“可以啊”“要不要辣的”“不用加辣”，一下子就拉近了距离，感觉像是去朋友一样，到了之后吃了点东西，然后还…
❤6
龙岗 果果 @guoguoya110 前言 龙岗中心城的妹妹，总要去看看，特别还是个金发妹妹，给人一种惊艳的感觉😏 颜值：9.0 脸的话跟6月26的视频很接近，人照一致的，过去没有落差，金发是半个月前染的，发根处有黑色，看起来会没有视频纯金色这么惊艳，右手有一块纹身，左手有两个字母，肤色是黄黑色，紫外线晒黑那种😏 身材：9.0 155的身高，体重确实是才80多斤的样子，胸有B大小，看起来很饱满，乳头偏黑色，小乳头小乳晕，肤色因为是黄黑色，导致没这么惊艳，腿是筷子腿，很细小的那种，屁股小小个没什么肉的，摸起来挺软的，不过后入的时候会有点疼，还是因为太瘦了😏 服务态度：8.8 提前约好时间，不过妹妹比较晚醒，后面给了地址，还好不算远，就赶了过去，这个算是很近的地方了，过去坐在沙发，就交了水费，然后开始陪洗，妹妹需要主动提醒需要做什么服务，需要自己操盘，不能等她服务的。后面床上的时候换姿势这些也是配合，也没有催时间😊 性体验： 8…
❤1
南山 小希 @xiaoxi0706 颜值：9.1 脸的话跟6月27的那个很接近了，人照很一致过去不会有什么落差，肤色是普通的黄色，身上没有留意到纹身，皮肤白哲，脸蛋满满的胶原蛋白，十八岁的小妹妹，就是嫩的代名词😏 身材：9.3 课表信息基本符合，160的身高，身上也没看到赘肉，胸是B+到C的大小，两点粉嫩，乳头有一点点内陷，后面也会立起来，肤色普通黄皮肤，小屁股挺翘的，腿是肉腿那种，摸起来手感不错，屁股很软也有肉，后入的时候感觉很好😏 服务态度：9.2 提前约好时间，然后提前到也是问了能上去，上去后就看到小希，先看了人照一致没有问题，就去沙发聊聊天，稍微聊了一下，小希也抱着她的猫猫一起看看，后面也是聊了一下猫猫，毕竟我也是养了好久猫的，洗澡的时候比较基础的洗干净，后面到床上等小希，服务基本都能做，不过胸比较怕痒，一开始还不好揉乳头，后面凿久了，就好了😊 性体验： 9.3 一开始也是先拉过来舌吻，是个小蛇，不过也是蛇到饱，后面等…
❤1
南山 心怡 @xinyimeimeid 前言 了却心愿之后出击欲望空前高涨，寻思一定得吃个好的，正巧前一天看到了心怡要开了，就决定问问心怡的，约好时间提前就到了，自聊的老师没有罚站😏 颜值：9.1 脸的话跟6月13的那个很接近了，人照很一致过去不会有什么落差，肤色是普通的黄色，化妆技术比较一般，有一些纹身，不过相对还好，都是小块的纹身😏 身材：9.5 167左右的身高，身上基本没有什么赘肉，胸有足C的程度，乳头淡褐色，小乳晕，手感非常好，腿型也是很不错的，带着点肉感，摸起来手感很好，有个大屁股，看起来视觉效果跟手感都很不错，后入感觉很好。😏 服务态度：9.8 过去前就沟通好，没有罚站的情况，上去之后就跟妹妹坐沙发上，妹妹也是贴过来，手就握着我的手，先是贴贴好一会，然后妹妹也没有催什么的，还是我主动说起去洗澡，洗澡的做的挺细心的，正反面都会洗好，洗完就上去等一下妹妹，妹妹上来也是会关心一下温度，不过因为后面很快就会热起来，就没…
福田 桐桐 @tonton788 前言 半个月多没有去了，决定去个不少人推荐的老师😏 颜值：9.5 嗯、意料之外的人比照片好看那种，很难评的频道视频跟照片，去到之后反而给我一种惊艳的感觉，只能说这个去到看人会有惊喜的感觉。皮肤黄偏白，身上没有纹身，给的惊喜感还拉高了不少分😏 身材：9.3 160左右的小妹妹，身材很不错的，胸型B+的大小，乳头内陷、乳晕不大，小腹没有赘肉，频道视频不可信，身材是很好看的，肤色黄偏白，腿型挺不错的，摸起来手感还不错，最后就是小翘臀，这个值得点赞的，翘而有肉，后入视觉效果极佳。😏 服务态度：9.5 约好了头课，后面问了一下能不能提前，看了一下时间我也是提前出发的，时间也刚好，我就同意了提前上去，上去开门一瞬间很惊艳，我也很罕见的比较多话，还夸了妹妹好看，过去坐在沙发上，因为比较急，就紧赶慢赶的过去，流了点汗，桐桐也是细心的擦拭了，坐下桐桐就跨过来坐在身上，摇啊摇的，我也顺势抱着桐桐，然后就这样游走…
❤1
#罗湖 #小泡芙 @babi5201314 前言 一个很新的老师，一开始就听说是自聊，不过还是担心中介这些，还认真看了一下课表，00年还担心有问题，但是一切担忧在见面的时候就烟消云散😏 颜值：9.4 人照在8.2到8.7之间，视频去掉一点磨皮就可以了，去的时候说在化妆，比较急急忙忙，妆感意外的挺好的，皮肤是黄稍微偏一点白，全身就腰间有一点点纹身，基本没影响。😏 身材：9.2 身高应该是160出头，小只一点的妹妹，身上基本没什么赘肉。胸在小B的程度，乳头意外的是粉丝的，小乳晕，腿型好看，是瘦的那种，摸起来不会软的那种，最后就是屁股，不算是大屁股，不过也是很有肉的，后入撞起来挺舒服的。😏 服务态度：9.5 约好时间提前到了，妹妹也会及时反馈，不会突然消失，这栋楼比较奇怪的电梯， 好不容易上来了，跟妹妹抱怨一下，妹妹马上也说后面也是打算换地方了，就没做好指引图，稍微聊了一下也就交水费了，看得出是自己做没多久的，比较生疏，不过跟妹妹…
❤1
#福田 #安然 @futiananran01 前言 被一个老师罚站50之后愤然离场，后面走走逛逛，到时候去的时候，联系时间比较晚，差点被以为鸽子😏 颜值：9.2 跟5.15的视频相似度比较高，去的时候化妆没化完，有一点点卡粉，也是在中间的时间，也能理解这个，皮肤黄偏白，见面一套情趣黑丝，相当会的一个老师😏 身材：9.2 身高165的妹妹，体重比课表的吃胖一些，胸不大，够用的程度，应该是B+，这次没有怎么摸大腿，不过皮肤摸起来还可以，滑滑的。😏 服务态度：9.5 进门看到个情趣黑丝的妹妹，开始老公的叫，我也顺势就进去，坐沙发的时候，安然也会主动找话题，说到这么晚才联系，还以为我鸽子了，不过好在也是准时上来了，洗澡两面都洗得很认真，今天比较热，洗完也是比较清爽，安然会拿好毛巾，帮着擦完后背，然后会蹲下来帮忙擦腿。床上也是配合主动。😊 性体验： 9.0 床上躺了一下，安然换了一套紫色镂空的情趣过来，现在一想我对紫色没有啥感觉，应…
#福田 #柠宝 @libaoAA 前言 二番战最适配我的妹妹，也从第一次10分钟，到了这次15分钟，依旧是实力满满😏 颜值：9.5 柠宝人照很一致，跟4.28的就很像了，基本没有太大差距，皮肤还不错的，肤色的话是黄稍微偏白，化妆是淡妆，柠宝我是很吃她的颜的😏 身材：9.2 照片是可爱风格的，但是过去是167的大个子妹妹，胸的话，当风吹过平坦的原野，谁说那里没有最深的风声😉。腿型是肉腿型的，摸起来不会软塌塌，挺舒服的。屁股有肉，撞起来很舒服。😁 服务态度：9.7 约好了时间，到了之后，柠宝直接就是梦哥哥好久不见，鞋子就提前放好在沙发前面，我过去坐着就先换好了，然后就让柠宝拿瓶水给我，后面就开始交水费洗澡，柠宝洗澡有种风风火火的，不过会把手也洗干净，擦干净身体的时候柠宝会很主动的帮擦后背，态度没话说的，去到二楼做，会提前开好空调，还会怕你刚过去冷，后面到床上也是有求必应😉 性体验： 9.6 柠宝过来也是先拉过来蛇，是小蛇🐍，不…
❤1
#南山 #王咪咪 @Szwmm669 前言 以前吃过甜到腻的马卡龙，一直以为马卡龙都是这个样子的，直到有一天我朋友旅游之后给我带回了一盒，吃了一口感觉是完全不同的，层次分明、甜而不腻。如果没有吃过好的马卡龙，那永远也不知道马卡龙的滋味到底应该是怎么样的😏 颜值：9.7 咪咪的颜值可以说得上是人照一致，跟她抽奖那个基本一样的，皮肤光滑，肤色黄偏白偏白，摸起来手感很好，化妆技术可以，一眼过去很好看。😏 身材：9.4 160左右的小萝莉一个，小小的一个，胸的话大概在B，小乳晕小乳头，乳头浅棕色吧，胸不算大不过手感很好，身材没有一天赘肉，腿型很好看，摸起来手感很好，屁股挺大的，而且很肉，撞起来不会疼😁 服务态度：9.8 一开始按华侨城那边定位，后面给了准确位置，发现要迟到几分钟，就跟提前跟咪咪说了，咪咪也是很好说话，快到的时候也是直接把位置发我，然后也留好门直接上去了。上去之后就看到只穿上衣的小萝莉，就躲在门后面，很让人惊喜的一幕，…
❤1
#龙华 #曼曼 @mmzq9 颜值：8.8 跟4.07的视频比较接近，去的时候化了妆，不过技术不够好，很嫩，曼曼的话可能素颜或淡妆会好很多，皮肤光滑，肤色是普通黄色，基本没有发现纹身。小香逼也是户型、颜色都是很不错的😏 身材：9.0 165-167左右的身高，胸的话在A的程度，小乳晕，小乳头，胸小小的，感觉还没我的大😏，身材没有赘肉，腿型也是不错的，很瘦的妹妹，没有赘肉，腰也是我很喜欢的细腰。😁 服务态度：9.0 提前约好时间，然后也是准时到达了，拍个照确定之后马上发了位置，然后上去了，上去之后先拿了瓶水，然后就交水费了，小坐了一下，就开始洗澡，也是等妹妹服务的，洗澡还算是仔细的，后面擦干净去床上等，提前降低空调温度，后面床上有求必应，蛇的方面是浅蛇😉 性体验： 8.9 曼曼过来之后，先到右边，然后也是拉过来蛇，是小蛇一个，后面就放开曼曼，曼曼开始舔胸口，舔的方式是那种舌头滋溜滋溜的那种，后面会整个含进去，口的时候也是挺不错…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @myhsjlsh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,035,198 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“老梦的出击记录” (@myhsjlsh), 334 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/myhsjlsh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.