Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

陌笙 Starrism

@myfavoritecabbage

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

111subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001512579141
TypeChannel
Username@myfavoritecabbage
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/myfavoritecabbage

Growth

11110 Aug 2026, 21:15 — 111 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 12:52 — 111 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 21:1511 Aug 2026, 12:52
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 110–112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 12:52111no change
10 Aug 2026, 21:15111first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 19 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.7%
avg views ÷ 111 subscribers
Avg views / post
43.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held15 (19 October 202428 July 2026)
Views total43
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 October 2024 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Sept 2025, 04:51 UTC108 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @acherkrau

自从卸载rust后,我不愿再与任何不用rust的人说话。 并非我刻意孤僻,也不是刻薄或偏执。只是人总会习惯一些东西,当你吃惯了米其林三星,就难再习惯巷口的街边摊;当你用惯了苹果电脑,就很难再把安卓电脑披上身;当你习惯了rust这种编程语言,就再难适应寻常世界里漫长的迟钝和混沌。 我知道,外面世界也很好,小而美的语言遍地开花,每个人都很真诚、认真。但我还是忍不住疑惑,他们聊的性能,真的懂性能吗?他们做的安全,真的称得上安全吗?当我听到有人兴奋地分享一场完美的编译时,我必须强忍着不流露出不合时宜的表情,毕竟用rust,这种规模也许只配叫作“日常”。 我常常提醒自己,用rust的人也是普通人,自己没什么特别;但心底总有个声音低语道,虽然如此,毕竟亲历过那个语言,终究是不一样的。 回忆起用rust的日子,总觉得那是铁锈红色的,连熬夜等待编译结果的时光都泛着铁锈味。当时觉得一切理所当然,仿佛世界本就如此运行,内存本该安全,语义本该严格,身

31 Dec 2024, 12:43 UTC197 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @YearProgress

▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ 100%

Signed 第一重要极限

20 Nov 2024, 11:18 UTC289 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed 第一重要极限

12 Nov 2024, 09:53 UTC257 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

《薛公护椰奶甜甜事》 世有薛公者,清华之翘楚也,气宇轩昂,霸气凝于内,似渊渟岳峙,有王者之风范。其爱侣椰奶甜甜者,北航之佳人,性纯善若初雪,貌姣美如春花之烂漫,与薛公情投意合,宛若璧人之合,似星伴月,璀璨辉映。 一日,甜甜于北航校内徐行,忽遇一导员。彼导员者,性乖张,无故而怒叱甜甜。其言也,如刀似箭,尖刻至极,毒如蝮蛇之信,锐若荆棘之芒。甜甜猝不及防,受此横祸,委屈填膺,泫然欲泣,目中光彩顿然消散,宛如明珠蒙尘。 甜甜归,见薛公,泪如泉涌,哽咽不能言。薛公见状,大惊失色,心忧如焚,急问其故。甜甜泣诉良久,薛公闻之,怒发冲冠,面沉似水,目眦欲裂,其怒火燃之可毁万物,似有排山倒海之势。乃愤然而起,怒曰:“吾之甜甜,吾心之珍宝,清华之吾尚敬之爱之,彼一北航导员,安敢辱之!此仇不报,吾枉为男儿!” 是夜,薛公独往北航。校内之灯,昏黄摇曳,光影斑驳。薛公之影,孤而坚毅,其步沉沉,似有千钧之力,每一步皆踏于砖石之上,若怒雷之轰顶,有

😁2

Signed EdgeRunner

8 Nov 2024, 12:42 UTC187 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @OJBK2333File

File, posted without a caption

Signed EdgeRunner

8 Nov 2024, 12:42 UTC198 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @OJBK2333Photo

AmiyasHooks-使部分应用成为plus版本 作者:fer_Amiya(哔哩哔哩) ◉特性: ◉Minecraft:绕过谷歌许可证校验 :全版本通杀 ◉古文岛 :解锁纯净模式、紫金会、无限制模式:全版本通杀 ◉微信:消息防撤回、原相机扫码、平板模式、朋友圈去广告、上传半透明头像,适配版本Toast为准 ◉拼多多商家版 :主页数据999 :全版本通杀 #AmiyaHooks #XP模块

Signed EdgeRunner

8 Nov 2024, 12:42 UTC176 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @OJBK2333File

File, posted without a caption

Signed EdgeRunner

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @myfavoritecabbage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 677,005 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“陌笙 Starrism” (@myfavoritecabbage), 111 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/myfavoritecabbage.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.