Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🐾Где лисички прячут лапки? 🍄🍂

@mycelium_cos

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

469subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001779359621
TypeChannel
Username@mycelium_cos
DescriptionMycelium channel Пожалуйста, при подписке убедитесь, что ваш профиль не безликий, не выглядит подозрительно или как бот (простое имя, странный набор букв), или обозначьте себя в комментариях, что вы живой заинтересованный фандомный человек.
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/mycelium_cos

Growth

4696 Aug 2026, 17:48 — 469 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:03 — 469 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 17:486 Aug 2026, 19:03
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 468–470 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 19:03469no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:48469first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
66.5%
avg views ÷ 469 subscribers
Avg views / post
312
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held14 (20 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total4,055
Reactions total521
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,360
Videos
87
Links
310

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

521 reactions across 13 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53911970576607565368315.9%
custom 54339522888613527257514.4%
6913.2%
👾6512.5%
❤‍🔥438.25%
custom 5453899448423832955417.87%
💘346.53%
custom 5291885134465755255326.14%
custom 5442646028517935303295.57%
custom 5251209444825519045214.03%
💋132.50%
91.73%
custom 537770202560360275430.576%
🌭20.384%
🥰20.384%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 521reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 13 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mycelium_cos. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC278 views39 reactions3 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⚜️💀💀💀People are fuel, 💀💀💀💀everybody burns 💀💀💀💀Just a little push 🤩🤩and maybe some will learn... ♠️♠️♠️♠️♠️💀♠️♠️♠️♠️♠️ 🤩🖤ph: Dzera 🤩🤍Xiaojing

custom 529188513446575525513custom 543395228886135272511👾8custom 539119705766075653621❤‍🔥1🌭1💋1

2 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC99 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Комментарии к посту выше съел фестрал 🌟🌟

👾7

2 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC198 views41 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🃏🃏🃏🃏🃏🃏 🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🃏🃏🃏🃏🃏 Прогремела небольшая вечеринка от Magic agency, на которую меня все-таки затащили, и это было прекрасно! Уютно, хотя и было жарковато, не много не мало людей, замечательный бар, великолепные волонтеры и вайб в который не вписаться бы не получилось! И музыка, вкусная музыка! В общем все понравилось, даже очень внезапный образ сел как родной, и Лили даже под конец почесала под подбородком!

custom 543395228886135272512custom 54426460285179353039custom 539119705766075653674custom 52918851344657552554👾2💋2custom 54538994484238329551

2 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC179 views56 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 — Знаешь анекдот, который п*@#'сам не рассказывают🌟 — Да, но я тебе его не расскажу.🌟 — Ах ты, остроумный ушлепок, всю шутку испортил! 🌟 🌟🌟🌟🤩🤩🤩🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🌟🌟 Sirius

22custom 545389944842383295515💘13custom 53911970576607565364👾1💋1

1 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC88 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @nori_noetPhoto

⚜️рекрасные, самые лучшие котята слева направо: ⚜️Беллатрисса ⚜️Северус ⚜️Сириус ⚜️Джеймс ⚜️Римус ⚜️очесали мне сегодня все мои хэдканоны, в очередной раз самый лучший слизерниец порадовал меня совместным отп, подурачились, поторчали в кустах, пообнимались, потанцевали - считаю, что успех. ⚜️алость удалась! 🤩

custom 53911970576607565369custom 543395228886135272584👾1💘1custom 52918851344657552551custom 54538994484238329551

1 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC164 views56 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️ Мародёры едут на пати ⭐️

custom 539119705766075653618custom 543395228886135272517👾13custom 53777020256036027543💋2🥰21

30 Jul 2026, 19:35 UTC156 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Второе прощупывание аудитории: Alien stage ещё на слуху? Х)

16custom 545389944842383295510custom 54339522888613527255💋31👾1

30 Jul 2026, 18:58 UTC159 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Напоминаю, что у меня есть закрытая изба-говорильня, куда я пускаю по легкому фейс-контролю и там мои "а что если" появляются в зародыше https://t.me/+MCAqidB9DdU4MDdi

custom 52918851344657552559custom 53911970576607565366👾42❤‍🔥2💋21custom 54538994484238329551

30 Jul 2026, 18:26 UTC140 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Кто смотрел/читал ателье колдовских колпаков? Планируем контент?🌚

9💘7👾43

28 Jul 2026, 13:16 UTC220 views61 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟Хочешь подсказку? 🌟🌟Нельзя еще больше унизить того, кто и так в самом низу. Так что не трать зря время, ни свое, ни мое. 🤩🌫️🤩🤩🤩🤩🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩🌟🤩🤩🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩🌟🌟 DEM 🌟🌟

❤‍🔥20👾20custom 53911970576607565361141🌭1💋1💘1

21 Jul 2026, 14:38 UTC579 views80 reactions4 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

😀😀😀😀😀Если бы ты 😀😀😀😀😀прорвалось наружу, 😀😀😀😀😀Разрушив рёбра 😀😀😀😀😀и кожу — 😀😀😀😀😀Это был бы 😀😀😀😀😀хороший 😀😀😀😀🤩конец всему. 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩Это был бы 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 хороший... 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌫️🌫️Dzera 🤩🤩 Xiaojing

custom 539119705766075653625❤‍🔥20custom 544264602851793530319custom 54538994484238329556custom 5291885134465755255531👾1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @mycelium_cos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 83,685 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🐾Где лисички прячут лапки? 🍄🍂” (@mycelium_cos), 469 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mycelium_cos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.