Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Я познаю @world

Channel

Я познаю @world

@my_waifu_was_alien_robot

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

297subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001421959748
TypeChannel
Username@my_waifu_was_alien_robot
Created2 January 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/my_waifu_was_alien_robot

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

29729929811 August 2026 — 298 subscribers11 August 2026 — 298 subscribers18 August 2026 — 297 subscribers25 August 2026 — 299 subscribers1 September 2026 — 298 subscribers17 September 2026 — 297 subscribers11 August 202617 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 37 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 297–299 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 13:57297-1
1 Sept 2026, 11:18298-1
25 Aug 2026, 04:16299+2
18 Aug 2026, 13:04297-1
11 Aug 2026, 09:30298no change
11 Aug 2026, 09:20298first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

63 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥3352.4%
2133.3%
custom 5370680879356064074812.7%
💔11.59%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC68 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

То есть Layerex бы ставил книжке 10/10, а я возьму и буду отнимать по балу за каждый недочёт книги. Минус за нерабочие примеры. Автор писал когда-то давно в ранних нулевых и умудрился сделать так, что не все сниппеты работают и это в таком окаменевшем, стандартизированном и обратно совместимом языке как CL. Да, на сайте есть errata, но при отдаче файлика lol.lisp на момент написания этой рецензии http сервер возвращ

4

9 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC70 viewsread 11 August 2026

Вот: (defun |#`-reader| (stream sub-char numarg) (declare (ignore sub-char)) (unless numarg (setq numarg 1)) `(lambda ,(loop for i from 1 to numarg collect (symb 'a i)) ,(funcall (get-macro-character #\`) stream nil))) Yo dawg! Мы написали макрос внутри твоего ридер макроса, чтобы ты мог контроливать уровень вложенности исполнения макросов, пока ты пишешь макросы.

9 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC64 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Вторая попытка чтения книги Let Over Lambda #настоящая_литература Я потратил на эту книгу 1 день 3 часа 25 минут чистого времени, точнее 27 часов и 25 минут. На решение одного из упражнений в книжке я убил 6 часов. Я продолжил читать и пришёл к выводу, что хочу начать чтение книжки заново, предварительно прочтя книжку On Lisp или по крайней мере постоянно к ней обращаясь. После этого я прекратил выполнение заданий

3

8 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC91 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Schrödinger's TOCTOU ...the definition of 'sane compiler' grows ever looser The binary you run is not the program you wrote. The compiler optimizer rewrites your source in ways you never see — and some of those changes can silently and legally turn seemingly secure code into vulnerable binaries. The same line can be safe under one compiler and exploitable under another, with nothing in the source to tell you which:

7 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC114 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Между тем на сайте книги появилась PDF. Читается гораздо лучше чем djvu с либгена. Но при этом всё ещё можно перепутать бэктик ` и апостроф 'потому что в тексте это выглядит просто как кавычки отличающиеся только направлением хвостика. При этом их лучше не перепутать, потому что в первом случае это означает квазицитирование, нужное чтобы частично приостановить выполнение кода в теле макроса, а во втором это просто

custom 53706808793560640743

6 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC126 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Книги про Common Lisp (почти все полезны в т.ч. для изучения Elisp): • (CLtL2) Steele — Common Lisp The Language 2 (устройство языка, с мотивацией; чуть шире стандарта ANSI) [html, tex, ps] • Graham — ANSI Common Lisp (незатейливый подробный учебник; много упражнений; автор не любит CLOS и loop) [webpage] • Graham — On Lisp (менее подробный учебник; цель — макросы) [ps, pdf] • Hoyte — Let Over Lambda (вторая и самая

❤‍🔥41

3 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC171 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Теперь я позер

❤‍🔥8💔1

2 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC182 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYOr8TlnqsY

2

31 Jul 2026, 08:11 UTC204 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_works_based_on_dreams

custom 53706808793560640742

27 Jul 2026, 11:14 UTC245 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

isopenbsdsecu.re мой любимый сайт про OpenBSD потому что на нём собраны почти что все возможные митигации против binary explotation собраны. Правда там есть пара обидных цитат из-за чего в чатах по сабжу его не любят. Но меня интересует не это. Из-за того, что разработчики OpenBaSeD не особо задумываются о threat model, а просто пихают все возможные security through obscurity (in a good sense) митигации получалилос

1

23 Jul 2026, 14:17 UTC266 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

But maybe one day I will become a PRO though...

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @my_waifu_was_alien_robot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Я познаю @world” (@my_waifu_was_alien_robot), 297 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/my_waifu_was_alien_robot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.