Channel
@my_publicnotes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
84subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002212468180 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @my_publicnotes |
| Description | Life researcher |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/my_publicnotes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 84 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 84 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (19 June 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 261 |
| Reactions total | 40 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
116 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 75 | 64.7% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 10.3% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 6.03% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 5.17% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 5.17% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 5.17% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 2.59% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.862% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Год назад я с командой сняла «Асистолию» — это мой первый короткий метр. А вчера узнала, что фильм прошёл отбор на один из крупнейших международных фестивалей короткого метра shnit. Теперь его покажут в десяти странах. Более того, по итогам голосования зрителей и жюри у фильма есть шанс получить право на рассмотрение для участия в «Оскаре» в 2027 году. Шанс, конечно, минимальный. Но сам факт, что я вообще пишу эти с…
❤15🔥8🙏4
Актуалочка
Один в поле не воин, а самостоятельный взрослый человек. Говорим про одиночество, которое бывает с каждым из нас, независимо от того, сколько людей рядом с нами находится. Про то, как от одиночества бывает тяжело, как оно бесит, как дарит нам удивительные моменты самоосознания в бушующем мире и как его иногда даже не хватает. Звукорежиссура одна на миллион — от Леры Кусто. Слушайте нас тут: 🟢Яндекс Музыка 🟢Apple Po…
❤1
Кто-то под пальмой на морях, а кто-то так
❤9🔥2
Пока Тома отмывается после летних фестивалей и леса, а Даша радуется, что не поехала на самую мокрую Бессонницу в истории, ловите фестивальный выпуск. У него особое настроение — немного безбашенное и отпускное, со стрёкотом травы и танцами в толпе. Звукорежиссура — от чудесной Леры Кусто. Слушайте нас тут: 🟢Яндекс Музыка 🟢Apple Podcasts 🟢Другие платформы
❤1
Тревога — моя подруга, мы с ней не разлей вода. Она у меня сильно обострилось во время работы в Яндексе. Был период, когда я просыпалась среди ночи и уже не могла уснуть: в голове просто включался бесконечный эфир мыслей о конце света. Потом организм сказал: «До свидания». Начался гастрит, которого раньше не было, и появились вопросы в духе: а зачем я вообще так живу? Вот тогда я пошла в КПТ. Думаю, эта терапия м…
❤6
Про планочку. Недавно была в Сбербанке. Рядом со мной сидел мужчина, лет, наверное, 55–60, и разговаривал с менеджером. Точнее, менеджер задавала ему вопросы, а он буквально не мог ответить ни на один. После каждого вопроса он оборачивался на женщину рядом — кажется, это была его дочь —, чтобы она ответила за него. И это было одновременно комично и страшно. Потому что передо мной сидел взрослый мужчина, который как…
❤10💯3
У вас ус отклеился
😁6❤2
Voice message, posted without a caption
🕊2🙏2
Вот мы и оказались в этой точке: выпуск про нейросети и то, как они поменяли нашу жизнь. Или мы надеялись, что поменяют, а они в ответ — «Понимаю, это сложно, твои чувства вполне логичны. Попробуй больше спать и не волноваться». Мы редко зовём к себе соведущих, а в этот раз отвели выпуск с ИИ-шницей. Смогла ли она быть с нами на одной волне — судить вам. Скажем одно — весь выпуск мы ржём. А какая ещё реклама ему нуж…
❤1
Поболтали с иишницей про ее житье-бытье
Последнее время благодаря киношколе стала очень остро замечать, как много мы говорим. Вот даже сейчас я пишу этот пост, и в нём тоже много слов. Возможно, даже больше, чем нужно. Вообще мир будто построен на бесконечных словесных пузырях. Мы постоянно что-то обсуждаем, анализируем, интерпретируем, объясняем. Почему мы родились. Зачем живём. Что хотел сказать автор. И чем дальше, тем сильнее мне кажется, что больша…
❤6💯3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @my_publicnotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 613,919 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Марк Шагал и ты шагай” (@my_publicnotes), 84 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/my_publicnotes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.