Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐌𝐗𝐈𝐒𝐇𝐀ᯓ(закрыт)

Channel

𝐌𝐗𝐈𝐒𝐇𝐀ᯓ(закрыт)

@mxishahelp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

101subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002629283002
TypeChannel
Username@mxishahelp
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mxishahelp

Growth

101104102.57 August 2026 — 104 subscribers9 August 2026 — 104 subscribers15 August 2026 — 103 subscribers22 August 2026 — 101 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 101–104 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 12:27101-2
15 Aug 2026, 00:58103-1
9 Aug 2026, 09:17104no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:14104first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 3 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

493 reactions across 10 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 547447802830838154310421.1%
custom 53639924298652355527415.0%
custom 60644362522103695776012.2%
custom 53076050368916667935711.6%
custom 5251368225471487942459.13%
custom 5411539861020628071295.88%
custom 6064426713088005076244.87%
custom 5366118468741526228224.46%
custom 5366263797549920933214.26%
custom 5411190727424103956204.06%
custom 5370821810117967910193.85%
custom 5411125955022312467183.65%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 493reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2025 to 29 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2025, 12:52 UTC735 views50 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

↳ stikers with oscar piastri #oscarpiastri #celebrity made by — @mxishahelp

custom 530760503689166679323custom 541112595502231246712custom 536626379754992093311custom 53661184687415262284

27 Aug 2025, 12:45 UTC713 views33 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

↳ stikers with embreigh courtlyn #embreighcourtlyn #celebrity made by — @mxishahelp

custom 536611846874152622813custom 53076050368916667937custom 53662637975499209335custom 54115398610206280714custom 54111907274241039563custom 54111259550223124671

26 Aug 2025, 07:43 UTC549 views36 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

↳ stikers with victoriyaam #victoriyaam made by — @mxishahelp

custom 541153986102062807114custom 530760503689166679310custom 54111907274241039567custom 53662637975499209333custom 53661184687415262281custom 54111259550223124671

25 Aug 2025, 09:58 UTC542 views48 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

↳ cuts with embreigh courtlyn #embreighcourtlyn #celebrity made by — @mxishahelp

custom 530760503689166679317custom 541153986102062807111custom 541119072742410395610custom 53661184687415262284custom 54111259550223124674custom 53662637975499209332

24 Aug 2025, 13:26 UTC453 views57 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

↳ stikers with miranda priestly #mirandapriestly #devilwearsprada made by — @mxishahelp

custom 525136822547148794221custom 536399242986523555212custom 547447802830838154312custom 60644362522103695776custom 53708218101179679103custom 60644267130880050763

23 Aug 2025, 08:17 UTC505 views48 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

↳ stickers with shebne gemeshchyu #shebnegemeshchyu #mybeautifullife made by — @mxishahelp

custom 547447802830838154318custom 606443625221036957711custom 53639924298652355529custom 60644267130880050764custom 52513682254714879423custom 53708218101179679103

22 Aug 2025, 10:00 UTC533 views49 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

↳ cuts with miranda priestly #mirandapriestly #devilwearsprada made by — @mxishahelp

custom 547447802830838154321custom 525136822547148794210custom 60644267130880050766custom 53708218101179679105custom 60644362522103695774custom 53639924298652355523

9 Aug 2025, 07:14 UTC≈1,170 views62 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

↳ stikers with lucy #lucy #sleepingbeauty made by — @mxishahelp

custom 536399242986523555228custom 606443625221036957714custom 547447802830838154312custom 53708218101179679103custom 60644267130880050763custom 52513682254714879422

5 Aug 2025, 16:56 UTC≈1,220 views50 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

↳ stickers with valentina zenere #valentinazenere #celebrity made by — @mxishahelp

custom 547447802830838154319custom 606443625221036957712custom 53639924298652355528custom 52513682254714879425custom 60644267130880050764custom 53708218101179679102

3 Aug 2025, 11:56 UTC≈1,170 views60 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

↳ stickers with cindy kimberly #cindykimberly #celebrity made by — @mxishahelp

custom 547447802830838154322custom 536399242986523555214custom 606443625221036957713custom 52513682254714879424custom 60644267130880050764custom 53708218101179679103

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @mxishahelp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,051,901 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐌𝐗𝐈𝐒𝐇𝐀ᯓ(закрыт)” (@mxishahelp), 101 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mxishahelp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.