Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for bio

Channel

bio

@mwhor

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

248subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002583462766
TypeChannel
Username@mwhor
Created22 April 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mwhor

Growth

24812 Aug 2026, 16:03 — 248 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 19:56 — 248 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 16:0312 Aug 2026, 19:56
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 247–249 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:56248no change
12 Aug 2026, 16:03248first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 22 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.63%
avg views ÷ 248 subscribers
Avg views / post
9.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 5 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held5 (22 April 202512 August 2026)
Views total9
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,414 reactions across 3 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 537554807373485082254538.5%
custom 535294100227124627121715.3%
custom 535288840610173871115711.1%
custom 52153615690089311451208.49%
custom 5309814904939625623715.02%
custom 5310274341886261550694.88%
custom 5298597150442151926584.10%
custom 5310196426884532089523.68%
custom 5453892692440277687503.54%
custom 5247133031235329609151.06%
custom 5456464798029996585130.919%
custom 5215415483733400344120.849%
custom 5249273776079640466110.778%
custom 5444898597130757098100.707%
custom 530993893930016730470.495%
custom 531246164417605374870.495%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,414reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2025 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,620
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 4 we hold a reading for · 75%
Most on one post
1,060
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mwhor. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 5 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 April 2025 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Oct 2025, 18:53 UTC≈10,500 views138 reactions300 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

◟ я ухожу в дни на неопределенный срок

custom 535288840610173871156custom 537554807373485082235custom 531027434188626155023custom 535294100227124627110custom 53098149049396256237custom 53099389393001673047

Signed метас1776

28 Sept 2025, 17:58 UTC≈10,600 views980 reactions260 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⤿ ставьте рк если 🥹 . . . ❳ ‹ 〽️ ⨾ проходили мимо ‹ 〽️ ⨾ бывший друг/подруга ‹ 〽️ ⨾ знакомый ‹ 〽️ ⨾ друг/подруга ‹ 〽️ ⨾ хотите познакомиться ‹ 〽️ ⨾ вы мой фанат

custom 5375548073734850822510custom 5352941002271246271207custom 5352888406101738711101custom 530981490493962562364custom 531019642688453208952custom 531027434188626155046

Signed метас1776

22 Apr 2025, 16:21 UTC≈16,400 views296 reactions1,060 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

метас ⇆ afk ≡ he/him only sx4sp7sx8 ⸝⸝ evanescia.ton • anon

custom 5215361569008931145120custom 529859715044215192658custom 545389269244027768750custom 524713303123532960915custom 545646479802999658513custom 521541548373340034412custom 524927377607964046611custom 544489859713075709810

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @mwhor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,184,836 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“bio” (@mwhor), 248 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mwhor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.