Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Слуцкие наблюдения

@mvska_5

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

935subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002925937016
TypeChannel
Username@mvska_5
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mvska_5

Growth

934935934.57 Aug 2026, 18:21 — 934 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 00:50 — 934 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 13:12 — 935 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:218 Aug 2026, 13:12
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 934–935 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 13:12935+1
8 Aug 2026, 00:50934no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:21934first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.2%
avg views ÷ 935 subscribers
Avg views / post
450
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held13 (15 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total5,403
Reactions total349
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

349 reactions across 11 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20859.6%
🔥7722.1%
👍318.88%
💯82.29%
💘61.72%
🐳41.15%
👌30.86%
🥰30.86%
👏20.573%
😁20.573%
🍾10.287%
🕊10.287%
🙈10.287%
🙏10.287%
🤗10.287%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 349reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC118 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Какой формат контента вам ближе всего?

  1. Печатные СМИ (газеты/ журналы)14%
  2. Короткие сообщения в ТГ95%
  3. Видео32%
  4. Подкасты22%

The shares total 163%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC187 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Новый опыт! Я впервые приняла участие в записи подкаста🌟 💬С чего все началось Светлана Бик, один из ведущих экспертов в России по теме устойчивого развития, автор ТГ-канала про ESG и зеленые финансы и платформы инфрагрин, и Иван Барсола, исполнительный директор Дирекции по ESG Сбербанка, всерьез занялись популяризацией темы зеленых финансов. И, на мой взгляд, очень вовремя: 2026 год, финансирование остается дорогим

14🔥7👌3👍2🍾1

5 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC282 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#путешествия Вы замечали, что один и тот же город (и даже один и тот же район) могут ощущаться совершенно по-разному? Да-да-да! Для меня впечатление от путешествия определяют четыре вещи: 1️⃣люди, с которыми путешествуешь (компания); 2️⃣«проводники», которые показывают свой город таким, каким видят его сами (местные/ гиды); 3️⃣собственное состояние/ самочувствие/ здоровье; 4️⃣погода. В этой поездке по Армении нам

12🔥1🙏1

2 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTC402 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026

☀️Продолжаю открывать для себя Москву как город лета! В моей копилке сразу три культурных события. О прошлых летне-московских приключениях рассказывала здесь. 1️⃣Первое — концерт Хиблы Герзмавы в Зеленом театре на ВДНХ. Ее голос великолепен, и она потрясающая! Но не без ложги дегтя: я чуть разочарована тем, что анонсированный джаз оказался советскими песнями в джазовых аранжировках😐 2️⃣Второе — летний джаз с Вадим

18🔥8👍5

30 Jul 2026, 16:50 UTC670 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026

❓❓Почему компании не расстаются с токсичными руководителями, от которых стонет коллектив? Есть гипотеза Эту тему подняли слушатели во время нашего эфира с Ольгой Климовой про сложные вопросы на собеседованиях – и вот сейчас делюсь ее ответом – а, собственно, почему? Почему существуют руководители, от которых буквально стонут команды? На них жалуются между собой сотрудники, коллеги из соседних подразделений, про их

🔥207💯6😁1

28 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTC531 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ойойой, так поздно (22+) — и про работу! Но пишу ⛵️Второй квартал промчался незаметно и треть третьего уже пролетела… а я очухалась)) И по доброй традиции (итоги первого квартала здесь) делюсь тем, чем он для меня запомнился — несколькими важными результатами. 1️⃣Мы продолжаем размещать зеленые облигации застройщиков. Во втором квартале таким проектом стало размещение для LEGENDA. Мое сердце каждый раз радуется,

15👍11🔥6

26 Jul 2026, 20:20 UTC575 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Человек на 60% состоит из воды. А я после Армении — из долмы😁 Закругляя тему последней поездки в этот гостеприимный край, о которой писала тут, тут, тут и тут, рассказываю о вкусах, которые растянулись в послевкусие. В Армении невозможно перестать есть. Здесь вкусно буквально все! Топ продуктов/ блюд — они же must try в Армении: 🔸Лаваш. Казалось бы: мука, вода, соль. Но когда его достают горячим из тандыра, удерж

21💘6🔥6😁1🙈1

24 Jul 2026, 15:35 UTC528 views53 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

☀️Host yourself или какой урок я вынесла первым из поездки в Дилижан (спойлер: и единственным) Как вы помните, я с азартом (аж три раза) анонсировала свою поездку на Art of Hosting, где в формате практик, нетворка & путешествия должна была учиться мастерству создания атмосферы в коллективах и сложных коммуникаций. Но мое участие в программе довольно быстро пошло не по плану😀 Я ехала учиться host others, но в начал

30🔥16👍6🐳1

22 Jul 2026, 17:47 UTC586 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Уходя — уходи! Но сделай это красиво👌 Мне очень нравится одна мысль: к людям стоит относиться так, как будто однажды от них может зависеть ваша жизнь (спасибо доброй подруге З, которая подкинула эту мысль чуть в другой интерпретации — будто зависит карьера). Никогда не знаешь, как сложится путь каждого из нас и где вы встретитесь снова. Поэтому, на мой взгляд, не стоит, уходя, оставлять после себя обиды и негатив —

14🔥6💯2

19 Jul 2026, 15:50 UTC590 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💔Севан — озеро, у которого есть своя история любви Озеру Севан (хотя есть мнение, что изначально дело было на Ване, которое находится на территории современной Турции) приписывают древнюю армянскую легенду. Якобы, на острове жила армянская княгиня Тамар, которая была влюблена в простолюдина. Юноша плавал от берега к острову каждую ночь, ведомый светом, который для него зажигала Тамара. Отец княгини прознал о визитах

36👍6🐳3🔥1🤗1

17 Jul 2026, 14:46 UTC486 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вам еще не наскучил армянский вайб? 🇦🇲Дилижан или «Маленькая Швейцария Армении» Большинство из нас знает Дилижан как город, где «самая лучшая в мире вода после Сан-Франциско» (помните, так утверждали в фильме «Мимино»)😄 Город очень зеленый, расположен в горах, поэтому здесь заметно прохладнее, чем в Ереване (там прямо зной). Что успели посмотреть: 🔸Информационный центр Дилижана. Очень приятное место: здесь прохо

18🔥6🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @mvska_5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTCAnonymous Poll37 voters

Какой формат контента вам ближе всего?

  1. Печатные СМИ (газеты/ журналы)14%
  2. Короткие сообщения в ТГ95%
  3. Видео32%
  4. Подкасты22%

The shares total 163%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 695,590 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Слуцкие наблюдения” (@mvska_5), 935 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mvska_5.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.