The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 10 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

Channel
MVC Announcement
@mvcofficialannouncement
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
363subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001930707933 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mvcofficialannouncement |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mvcofficialannouncement |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:16 | 363 | -2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:41 | 365 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 366 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 368 | -5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 373 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 376 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 376 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 31 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
235 reactions across 17 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 101 | 43.0% | |
| 👍 | 36 | 15.3% | |
| ❤ | 31 | 13.2% | |
| 🤡 | 21 | 8.94% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 4.26% | |
| 💩 | 10 | 4.26% | |
| 🤮 | 7 | 2.98% | |
| 🤝 | 6 | 2.55% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 1.70% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 1.28% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.851% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.426% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 0.426% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.426% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 0.426% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 235 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2024 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 20 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
📣Announcement 183: 🚨 MVC COMMUNITY MUST READ 🚨 We have received feedback from community members that some users mistakenly purchased the wrong token on MEXC when trying to acquire our project's token. Important Clarification: The official token of Microvisionchain listed on MEXC is “SPACEMVC”, not “SPACE”. The “SPACE” token currently trading on MEXC has no affiliation with Microvisionchain whatsoever. We urge all…
👍7❤2🤡2
Q: Why is this plan considered fair and transparent? A: All 6,669,707.83 SPACE will be distributed to miners through transaction fee subsidies, where miners compete for transaction mining rights based on their hash power. No one can know which miner will mine the next block. To compete for these fees, miners may increase their hash power, thereby enhancing the security and value of the MVC chain. The plan uses MVC's …
❤4🤮3💩1
📣Transaction Fee Subsidy Plan for Miners According to the agreements in MIP-58, we have 6,669,707.83 SPACE allocated for distribution to miners. This portion has been reserved at the address: 1GK42qyJuhLuRJTQDzkjB7QxxS3GxmWQBb. We have been seeking a fair, transparent, and implementable solution to fulfill the distribution commitments to miners outlined in MIP-58. After several months of testing, we have decided to…
💩1
📣Announcement on the Execution of MIP-58 Proposal The establishment of the MVC Foundation is based on MIP-58. For details on MIP-58, please refer to: https://mvc-dao.gitbook.io/mvc-dao/proposal-and-recap/mvc-proposal-record/mip-58 Starting from January 16, 2025, the MVC Foundation has strictly executed the relevant funding portions according to the agreements in MIP-58. To better implement the upcoming "Transaction…
💩1
📣Announcement 182: Exciting news! 🎉 We’ve got answers about MVC extensions and the MetaBitcoin Network (MBN)!🚀 English Version Review Link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UxRfh2NSOla8-7Gtz9dnVUVHA5zoUEJ9/view?usp=sharing Thanks for all your amazing support! 💪🏻 Let’s keep shining together! #space @mvcglobal #bitcoin Thanks to Teye @ProsperKorley Tweet: https://x.com/mvcglobal/status/1923685972375634382?s=46
❤7🔥2👏1💩1
📣Announcement 181: Exciting trend! 🔥 More users are choosing MVC over Bitcoin for certain transactions, leveraging MVC's sidechain capabilities. With block sizes nearing Bitcoin's, @mvcglobal is proving to be the highest-performing Bitcoin sidechain. As MetaSo and the MVC ecosystem grow, we anticipate MVC surpassing Bitcoin in key metrics, solidifying its position as the go-to Web3 platform on Bitcoin #MVC #Bitco…
🔥9💩2👏1🤣1
📣Announcement 180: 🚀 Breaking News! @metasonetwork, the decentralized social media platform built on Bitcoin, is taking the world by storm! In just two days after the launch, we've welcomed over 2,000 new users and clocked in a whopping 30,000 transactions. Talk about making waves! 🌊 MVC is proving to be the best Bitcoin sidechain, and we're just getting started. Join us together on this wild ride to a better Web…
🔥13❤1👍1👏1🤡1
📣Announcement 179: 🎉Congratulations on MetaSo's imminent launch! MetaSo is an important project within the @mvcglobal ecosystem, and we believe that with the promotion of MetaSo, we will soon see a truly decentralized social media network built on Bitcoin and MVC. #space Twitter: https://x.com/mvcglobal/status/1915763060637356209?s=46 MetaSo website: https://www.metaso.network/
🔥6
📣Announcement 178: Recap of special AMA session: Bitcoin Layer 2 vs. Ethereum Layer 2: Which is the Future? Time: 8 PM (UTC+8), February 13, 2025 Location: MVC Twitter Space + Ctalk Twitter Live + Coinw Live 🌟 Meeting Highlights: - Technical comparison, providing more robust smart contract support. - Use cases for DeFi, gaming, and NFT applications. - The future outlook, will improve the overall efficiency and sc…
👍5🔥5👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mvcofficialannouncement. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 5
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 5
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@mvcofficialannouncement named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 9 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MVC Announcement” (@mvcofficialannouncement), 363 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mvcofficialannouncement.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.