Channel
@muzaffarmurodov_blog
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
806subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001298990747 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @muzaffarmurodov_blog |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/muzaffarmurodov_blog |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:39 | 806 | +2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:35 | 804 | +3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:42 | 801 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 802 | +7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 795 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 800 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 800 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
435 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 140 | 32.2% | |
| 💯 | 121 | 27.8% | |
| 👍 | 67 | 15.4% | |
| ❤ | 50 | 11.5% | |
| ⚡ | 34 | 7.82% | |
| 👏 | 23 | 5.29% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 435 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hook'larni yangilang. Odamlar ulardan charchadi. 3 ta maslahat... Videoni oxirigacha ko'ring... 3-chisi sizni hayratda qoldiradi... Bir paytlar ishlagan. Bugun esa memga aylangan. Chunki odamlar endi hookni emas, uning ortidagi niyatni ko'radi. Agar hook ichidagi va'da kontentda bo'lmasa, odam ikkinchi marta sizni tinglamaydi. Bugun odamlar sun'iy kontentdan charchagan. Ular mukammal ssenariyni emas, tab…
💯14👍5⚡4❤2🔥2
Qimmat uy sotilmaydi degan fikr noto'g'ri. Ko'pchilik shunday o'ylaydi. Narxi qimmat bo'lsa, sotish qiyin. Amalda esa har doim ham bunday emas. Ba'zan 500 mln so'mlik uy xaridori 30 kun o'ylab qaror qa'bul qiladi. Lekin 2 mlrd so'mlik uy xaridori 3–7 kunda shartnoma qilishi mumkin. Chunki qarorni faqat narx hal qilmaydi. Ko'pincha qimmat uy xaridori narxni emas, qiymatni, ishonchni baholaydi. Unda katta moliy…
🔥8👍2👏2
Ko‘p developer marketingni noto‘g‘ri joydan boshlaydi. Sotuv pasaydi. Va birinchi qiladigan ishi reklama byudjetini oshirish. Aslida esa muammo reklamada bo‘lmasligi mumkin. Balki Call Center mijozni yo‘qotayotgandir. Balki sotuv bo‘limi follow-up qilmayotgandir. Balki to‘lov shartlari bozordan ortda qolgandir (eskirgan). Balki mijozning asosiy qo‘rquviga javob berolmayotgandirsiz. Reklama faqat mijozni olib …
🔥8👍5⚡2
Agar mijoz sizni tanlamasa… bu raqobatchingizni tanladi degani emas. Ko‘pchilik sotuv bo‘limlari shunday o‘ylaydi. Aslida esa bugungi bozorda eng katta raqobatchi “kutish.” Mijoz bozordan chiqib ketmayapti. U qarorini kechiktiryapti. Risk qilishni xohlamayapti. Bozordagi o‘zgarishlarni kuzatyapti. Narx tushishini kutyapti. Yoki umuman uy olish fikrini vaqtincha to‘xtatib qo‘yyapti. Fokusi boshqa joyda. Shun…
🔥8👍1👏1
Qurilishda eng qiyin ish mijoz topish emas. Eng qiyin ish sotib olgan mijozni yo‘qotmaslik. Bir tanishim O‘zbekistondagi top quruvchidan uy olgan. Shartnoma olib to’lov qilguncha deyarli har kuni sotuvchilari aloqada bo‘lishgan. To‘lov qilingandan keyin esa vaziyat o‘zgargan. Qurilish jarayoni haqida so‘rasa, telefonini ko‘tarmaydigan bo‘lishgan. Javob olish uchun bir necha kun ham kutgan. Oxiri menga aytgan g…
👍9❤4🔥4
Qurilish kompaniyasining Instagram sahifasi faqat yangi mijoz topish uchun emas. Ko‘pchilik Instagramni faqat reklama va sotuv kanali deb o‘ylaydi. Aslida esa uning yana bir muhim vazifasi bor. Sotib olgan mijozning ishonchini saqlab qolish. Mijoz shartnoma imzolagandan keyin ham sizni kuzatadi. Qurilish qayergacha yetdi? Qaysi blok bitdi? Nimalar o‘zgardi? Jarayon qanday ketyapti? Shu savollarga javobni mun…
🔥8⚡4👍3
Mijoz narxdan qochmaydi. Ishonchsizlikdan qochadi. Narxni pasaytirishga shoshilmang. Avval ishonchni oshiring. @muzaffarmurodov_blog
💯16
Quruvchilarni eng ko‘p qiynayotgan muammo sotuv emas. Eng katta qo‘rquv katta xonadonlarning sotilmay qolishi. Bu tabiiy. Yaqinda bir loyihaga taklif qilishdi. Tahlil qilib ko’rdim. 110 ga yaqin 3–4 xonali xonadonlar hali ham sotilmagan. Uylar tayyor. Kadastir ham chiqqan. Endi esa ularni deyarli kotlovan narxida sotishga majbur bo‘lishyapti. Va shunda ham sotish oson emas. Muammo qayerda? Ko‘pchilik quruvch…
❤7🔥6👏2💯1
Avval qurib olaman, keyin qimmatga sotaman. Qurilishdagi eng qimmat xatolardan biri shu. Bir necha real loyihalarda shuni ko‘rdik. 2 yil oldin kotlovan paytida kv metri 1000$ edi. Loyiha bitgach esa 970$ ga sotishga majbur bo‘lishdi. Nega? Chunki bugungi mijozlarning aksariyati 100% to‘lov bilan emas, bo‘lib to‘lash orqali uy oladi. Tayyor uyda esa bu imkoniyat cheklanadi. Natijada narxni tushirishga majbur b…
👍9🔥7❤3
Arzon lead eng qimmat lead bo‘lishi mumkin. Ko‘pchilik marketologlar CPL juda arzon chiqdi deb xursand bo‘ladi. Lekin biznes egasi boshqa savol berishi kerak. Buncha leaddan nechta sotuv bo‘ldi? Masalan. 100 ta sifatli lead → 10 ta sotuv. 5000 ta arzon lead → 5 ta sotuv. Qaysi biri arzon? Qaysi biri qimmat? Lead narxi arzon bo‘lishi biznes uchun foydali degani emas. Agar sotuv bo‘lmasa, eng arzon lead ham eng…
🔥7💯3❤2
Sotuv bo‘limidagi bitta xato 100 ta leadni yo‘q qilishi mumkin. Mijoz "1 hafta o‘ylab ko‘raman" "Keyinroq o‘zim bog‘lanaman" deydi. Ko‘pchilik sotuvchilar esa kutishni boshlaydi. Aslida shu yerda mijoz yo‘qoladi. Bir narsani unutmaslik kerak. O‘zim bog‘lanaman degan mijozlarning aksariyati hech qachon bog‘lanmaydi. Professional sotuvchi esa boshqacha yo’l qiladi. Mayli, unda kelasi chorshanba soat 15:00 da o‘…
💯7❤6👍4⚡2👏1
300.000$ pul havoga uchib ketgandi. Va eng achinarlisi, buni marketing deb o‘ylashgan. Bir loyihada ishlaganmiz. Kompaniya 300 ming dollar atrofidagi budjetni 6 oylik ambassador bilan hamkorlikka sarfladi. Natijachi? 30 ta uy ham sotilmagandi. Eng qizig‘i, shu budjet performance marketingga, kontent marketingga, sotuv tizimiga sarflanganida sarflanganda, o‘zini bir necha barobar qoplardi. Men, kerakmas bunaqa …
🔥9⚡5👍4❤2👏2💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @muzaffarmurodov_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Muzaffar Murodov | blog” (@muzaffarmurodov_blog), 806 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/muzaffarmurodov_blog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.