Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Muuurrchik

Channel

Muuurrchik

@muuurrchik

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

47,803subscribers

-784 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001441884489
TypeChannel
Username@muuurrchik
DescriptionМурчик с юбуба. Пощу, че понравилось) Предложка - @Gaaavvchik Купить рекламу: https://telega.in/c/muuurrchik Регистрация РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/676fe3514e740947bed06eea
Created1 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/muuurrchik

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

47,80348,58748,1957 August 2026 — 48,587 subscribers7 August 2026 — 48,586 subscribers8 August 2026 — 48,572 subscribers9 August 2026 — 48,541 subscribers10 August 2026 — 48,525 subscribers11 August 2026 — 48,508 subscribers12 August 2026 — 48,472 subscribers13 August 2026 — 48,474 subscribers14 August 2026 — 48,467 subscribers16 August 2026 — 48,478 subscribers17 August 2026 — 48,465 subscribers18 August 2026 — 48,447 subscribers19 August 2026 — 48,433 subscribers20 August 2026 — 48,411 subscribers21 August 2026 — 48,389 subscribers22 August 2026 — 48,365 subscribers24 August 2026 — 48,320 subscribers25 August 2026 — 48,288 subscribers26 August 2026 — 48,267 subscribers27 August 2026 — 48,233 subscribers28 August 2026 — 48,218 subscribers29 August 2026 — 48,184 subscribers30 August 2026 — 48,156 subscribers31 August 2026 — 48,130 subscribers1 September 2026 — 48,086 subscribers2 September 2026 — 48,056 subscribers4 September 2026 — 48,021 subscribers6 September 2026 — 47,989 subscribers9 September 2026 — 47,910 subscribers11 September 2026 — 47,870 subscribers13 September 2026 — 47,888 subscribers15 September 2026 — 47,870 subscribers17 September 2026 — 47,835 subscribers25 September 2026 — 47,803 subscribers7 August 202625 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net -784. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,685–48,705 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 17:5747,803-32
17 Sept 2026, 07:3947,835-35
15 Sept 2026, 09:1747,870-18
13 Sept 2026, 17:4147,888+18
11 Sept 2026, 23:2147,870-40
9 Sept 2026, 12:3947,910-79
6 Sept 2026, 02:1647,989-32
4 Sept 2026, 01:1548,021-35
2 Sept 2026, 13:1748,056-30
1 Sept 2026, 13:4448,086-44
31 Aug 2026, 11:4448,130-26
30 Aug 2026, 09:2548,156-28
29 Aug 2026, 08:2748,184-34
28 Aug 2026, 08:2448,218-15
27 Aug 2026, 11:2748,233-34
26 Aug 2026, 08:1848,267-21
25 Aug 2026, 11:1248,288-32
24 Aug 2026, 08:2548,320-45
22 Aug 2026, 14:3848,365-24
21 Aug 2026, 05:0548,389first reading

Engagement

499 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 114 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.0%
avg views ÷ 47,803 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,000
267 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
267
of 499 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held499 (5 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total3,195,569
Reactions total171,084
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 00:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈18,100
Videos
≈2,040
Links
≈2,350

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 12m
Average length
1m 14s

Measured directly from 107 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

331,079 reactions across 498 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤170,89451.6%
😁40,85412.3%
🔥32,4159.79%
🫡25,4617.69%
🐳17,5775.31%
🍓16,0904.86%
👍9,1272.76%
🥰6,0431.83%
💋4,0861.23%
🌭3,3881.02%
😍2,9940.904%
🍌1,6860.509%
😎4640.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 499 of the 499 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 331,079 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 499 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
61
across the posts below
Posts paid on
39
of 499 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @muuurrchik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 499 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.802%
4 of 499 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
4
posts carrying an erid · 4 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
11,700
over 4 measured posts
Median views · rest
12,700
over 495 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGs6e3K112 August 202612 August 2026
2W5zFHFCQYh128 August 202628 August 2026
2W5zFHkYgXs114 August 202614 August 2026
2W5zFK5xr9w114 August 202614 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 499 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 18:12 UTC≈7,950 views1,116 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Кирилла перекрасили в Белого Царя 😁 ой жааних прям

🥰814🔥142😁98❤44🫡8🍓6🐳3😍1

29 Sept 2026, 16:37 UTC≈9,680 views213 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Poll

Кого крутим?

  1. Митя33%
  2. Валера8%
  3. Оба двое19%
  4. Скип всех нафиг39%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍151❤47🐳11🌭3🔥1

29 Sept 2026, 13:12 UTC≈11,300 views1,133 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Самое веселое, что сейчас есть в каммунити - это мемы с Роновой и Митей

🔥855❤137😁66🐳58🫡11👍4🍓2

29 Sept 2026, 10:15 UTC≈12,000 views596 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video

Балету поучились, теперь учимся оперировать 😖😖😖 Смотрим коллабный видосик Геншина с Театром имени Станиславского, при участии ведущей сопрано Дарьи Тереховой. В 7.1 вот она была, да.

❤477🔥78🐳32👍5😍2🍌1💋1

29 Sept 2026, 10:02 UTC≈11,500 views689 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Анонс Валеры 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈

❤524🍓89👍39🫡13🔥11💋7🐳5🍌1

29 Sept 2026, 09:47 UTC≈11,700 views415 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

😀 30 Гемов — OPERACOLLAB Вводить здесь или в игре.

❤351🔥37👍21🐳6

29 Sept 2026, 08:37 UTC≈11,200 views901 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Было/Стало

❤683🫡153😁47🐳11🔥7

29 Sept 2026, 06:48 UTC≈11,700 views948 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

С днюхой Николая 😧 Честное мнение го о персонаже?

❤790🐳67🫡45🥰13🌭7🍓7🔥7👍4

29 Sept 2026, 05:11 UTC≈11,900 views403 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video

Правила не имеют значения 🔍 Эксперт Королевской энергетической комиссии Снежной 💡 Экспертам свойственна исключительная эффективность и способность достигать поразительных результатов за ограниченное время, однако «требования к посещаемости», рассчитанные на производительность обычных исследователей, для них не что иное, как клетка. Даром тратить дни легко, но разве не жаль было бы пройти мимо тех чудес, тех пёстрых …

❤330😁37👍16💋6🐳4🔥4🍓3🥰3

29 Sept 2026, 04:55 UTC≈11,800 views859 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Анонс Мити, доброе утро 🤩🤩🤩

❤698🐳81🍓55💋14🔥7👍4

28 Sept 2026, 20:16 UTC≈12,800 views887 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Скучаете? Тогда вот вам тема на ночь. Кто из этих двоих хуже? 🙈

🔥607😁170❤75🫡24🐳5💋5👍1

28 Sept 2026, 15:27 UTC≈13,400 views885 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Спёр от кого-то в твиттере, но шахматной фигурой в квесте про грешников нам показали кадык Хрофтатюра с "печатью" неизвестного происхождения, а не корону Возможно именно эта часть тела стала первой, заражённой бездной

❤689🔥100😁66🫡13🍓10🐳3💋3👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 499 posts we hold for @muuurrchik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Sept 2026, 16:37 UTCAnonymous Poll6,040 voters approx.

Кого крутим?

  1. Митя33%
  2. Валера8%
  3. Оба двое19%
  4. Скип всех нафиг39%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Sept 2026, 14:41 UTCAnonymous Poll9,160 voters approx.

Прошли сюжет?

  1. Да47%
  2. Нет54%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Sept 2026, 18:33 UTCAnonymous Poll7,490 voters approx.

Прошли 11 этаж?

  1. Да62%
  2. Нет38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Sept 2026, 11:02 UTCAnonymous Poll10,000 voters approx.

Кого возьмете из бесплатных?

  1. Бай Жук11%
  2. Нилу9%
  3. Варесе28%
  4. Торт16%
  5. Клоринда21%
  6. Тиори14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Sept 2026, 18:25 UTCAnonymous Poll6,080 voters approx.

Время опроса: кого крутим?

  1. Весну12%
  2. Водяницу19%
  3. Обеих10%
  4. Скип всех нафиг59%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTCAnonymous Poll7,250 voters approx.

Прошли сюжетку?

  1. Да, все прошел и зачистил34%
  2. Только основную36%
  3. Нет еще31%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 499 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Zenless Zone Zero | Muuurrchik
@zzzmuuurrchik · 21,713
#1
Ванильные Сливки | Genshin Impact
@vanileaks · 665,642
#2
Genshin Impact RU
@genshin_impact_ru_off · 478,322
#3
Wuthering Waves | Muuurrchik
@wuwamur · 4,070
#4
Genshin Impact [RC]
@GenshinRC · 219,703
#5
Genshin Media
@genshinmedia · 157,003
#6
Ростик и лунная жызнь
@yenselife · 11,318
#7
Reddit | Genshin Leaks
@genshinreddit · 51,601
#8
Genshin Impact Lore
@genshin_lore · 88,642
#9
Хонкай: Стар Рейл | Бледная
@blednayaleaks_hsr · 66,426
#10
Ванильная Зона | Zenless Zone Zero
@vanizone · 130,538
#11
Геншин Дроп / GenshinDrop.io - кейсы с примогемами Геншин Импакт 💎
@genshindropcom · 486,347
#12
Новости Genshin Impact | GI News
@GenshinImpactNewsGI3 · 128,078
#13
✧ подвал vlenvv ✧
@imvlenvv · 6,780
#14
Ветерок Мондштадта | Genshin Impact 🍃
@impact_genshin · 105,659
#15
твиттер импакт
@twitterimpact · 13,929
#16
ПАРИ | GENSHIN IMPACT
@parigenshin · 12,394
#17
Artemida
@artemidathea · 667
#18
mirabilis medicus IL Dottore
@dottoreGor · 1,634
#19
Reddit | Zenless
@zenlessleak · 24,432
#20
Торнике в ПРАЙМЕ | BaNaNcHiK1
@bananchik1tv · 2,713
#21
H:SR Academy | Гайды, советы Honkai: Star Rail
@hsr_academy · 10,216
#22
Miron Min Max
@MironMinMax · 27,430
#23
Genshin Academy | Официальный канал | Гайды по Genshin Impact
@genshin_academy · 14,184
#24
Genshin Intel | CBT
@GenshinCBT · 97,943
#25
☠️AKINE
@AKINENIKA · 7,404
#26
Дневник Неудачника | Genshin Impact
@firo_neydacnik · 41,117
#27
AnimeCool - Сайноmainee n*des
@gensh_animecool · 7,053
#28
ХАНСТВО
@hahanstvo · 1,669
#29
Genshin Stellar Honey️❄️
@GenshinHoney · 11,684
#30
Эй, Вадимчик | Genshin Impact
@hey_vadimchik · 19,671
#31
Ed from Abyss
@edfromabyss · 590
#32
DzeN
@poznay_dzen · 3,269
#33
ABYSS CUP | ABYSS.DARTE.GG
@abysscup · 12,617
#34
Парадокс Паймон | Genshin Impact
@paradoksGenshin · 94,158
#35
GL1n
@gl1n_impact · 52,471
#36
Ванильный Хонкай | Honkai: Star Rail
@vanihsr · 248,727
#37
Библиотека Лизы 📚 Genshin Impact
@slivu_genshin_impact · 198,773
#38
Honkai: Star Rail RU
@honkaistarrailofficial · 233,443
#39
Геншин Импакт | Бледная
@blednayaleaks_genshin · 110,637
#40
TRBVFLK
@TurboVafelkaGroup · 10,440
#41
Союз ХОРНИ архонта
@ARCHorny_union · 40,487
#42
Вести от Паймон
@paimon_leaks · 124,772
#43
Zenless Zone Zero | iNFO
@Zenless_Zone_Zero_Info · 104,366
#44
SadShmyga
@SadShmyga · 6,466
#45
Honkai: Star Rail | iNFO
@honkai_star · 115,481
#46
Reddit | Genshin Impact
@redditgenshin · 29,867
#47
Reddit | Honkai: Star Rail
@hsrreddit · 32,521
#48
Honkai: Star Rail | Миря
@honkai_star_rail_leaks · 3
#49
Кана печатает...
@kana_exe · 5,178
#50
AstraLore
@astralore · 18,148
#51
Shiyu Cup l shiyu.darte.gg l Zenless Zone Zero
@shiyucup · 4,254
#52
Мнимый уголок | Honkai: Star Rail
@imaginarycorner · 9,216
#53
Fact Genshin Impact
@fact_impact · 15,846
#54
Zenless Zone Zero
@Zenless_Zone_Zero · 70,349
#55
Fact Honkai: Star Rail
@fact_honkaistarrail · 23,884
#56
Чайная беседка Чжун Ли
@podaimory · 3,037
#57
Пророчества Лунного Интейвата 🌙 | Genshin Impact
@inteyvatleaks · 8,944
#58
Fact Zenless Zone Zero
@fact_zzz · 6,897
#59
Акс общается
@AxeSayTalk · 10,637
#60
Zenless Media
@zenless · 18,075
#61
Пекарня
@pekagame · 1,089,162
#62
Тейватские Гайды | Genshin Impact
@teyvat_guids · 298,023
#63
Grecha x Овсянка AI
@grettach · 5,316
#64
MIRROR CUP
@mirrorcup · 4,102
#65
Гайды от Банбу | Zenless Zone Zero
@Bangboo_Guides · 88,990
#66
здесь живет броен
@br1anm7ps · 1,090,016
#67
Wuthering Waves | iNFO
@wuthering_waves_info · 49,669
#68
Honkai: Star Rail Новости | HSR News
@HonkaiStarRailNewsHsr · 69,754
#69
Компаньон Паймон!
@paimon_impact · 28,143
#70
Винди31🤝
@windy31room · 539,834
#71
WuWa Land | Wuthering Waves
@wuwaland · 35,321
#72
HoYoverse | Honkai: Star Rail
@hsr_newss · 29,565
#73
Лололошка ФУ НОВОСТИ
@LololoshkaUSE · 514,317
#74
Пом-Пом вещает | Honkai Star Rail
@honkai_star_rail_pompom · 25,322
#75
Каргас
@kargacc · 99,030
#76
4ch
@why4ch · 1,042,455
#77
Zenless NEWS | Zenless Zone Zero
@ZenlNews · 12,012
#78
персик
@anthonyuly · 233,890
#79
Wuthering Waves
@wutheringwaves · 157,436
#80
ВПШ
@pravdadirty · 1,395,339
#81
Kuplinov ► Play
@Kuplinov_Telegram · 912,690
#82
КК
@petrovtel · 525,264
#83
Honkai: Утечки от Байлу | HSR
@Honkai_utechki · 59,705
#84
Тесты и точка.
@test_dot · 516,667
#85
твиттота
@twitt_ota · 331,915
#86

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Zenless Zone Zero | Muuurrchik
@zzzmuuurrchik · 21,713
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
Ванильные Пикчи | Мемы
@vanipikchi · 20,753
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 September 2026
Miron Min Max
@MironMinMax · 27,430
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
Ванильные Сливки | Genshin Impact
@vanileaks · 665,642
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 August 2026
Парадокс Паймон | Genshin Impact
@paradoksGenshin · 94,158
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 17 August 2026
Марко
@markoacademy · 20,377
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 27 September 2026
GL1n
@gl1n_impact · 52,471
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
Reddit | Genshin Leaks
@genshinreddit · 51,601
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 25 August 2026
Reddit | Zenless
@zenlessleak · 24,432
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 September 2026
Дневник Неудачника | Genshin Impact
@firo_neydacnik · 41,117
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 29 August 2026
Раскрываем потанцевал
@olezha_HSR · 30,561
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 7 September 2026
WuWa Land | Wuthering Waves
@wuwaland · 35,321
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 2 September 2026
Анимэр
@merismine · 23,920
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 17 September 2026
Vicineko
@vicineko_full · 36,793
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 2 September 2026
ГУСЬ
@i11ush · 36,102
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 2 September 2026
Союз ХОРНИ архонта
@ARCHorny_union · 40,487
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 August 2026
Новости Катерины | Новости Геншин Импакт
@news_genshin · 24,606
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026
Мрачный Тейват | Genshin Impact
@mrakteyvat · 22,766
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 September 2026
Reddit | Genshin Impact
@redditgenshin · 29,867
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 September 2026
Genshin Universe
@GenshinUni · 52,645
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026
Хвостик Эллен | Zenless Zone Zero
@Ellenoff · 54,429
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026
Neverness to Everness | NTE
@NevernessToEverness · 53,525
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 26 August 2026
Wuthering Waves | iNFO
@wuthering_waves_info · 49,669
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
Компаньон Паймон!
@paimon_impact · 28,143
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 34 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Muuurrchik” (@muuurrchik), 47,803 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/muuurrchik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.