Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Кана печатает...

Channel

Кана печатает...

@kana_exe

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,146subscribers

+42 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001843415668
TypeChannel
Username@kana_exe
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kana_exe

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,1005,1465,1237 August 2026 — 5,104 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,104 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,100 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,110 subscribers18 August 2026 — 5,124 subscribers21 August 2026 — 5,135 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,136 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,139 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,129 subscribers3 September 2026 — 5,127 subscribers7 September 2026 — 5,128 subscribers11 September 2026 — 5,130 subscribers15 September 2026 — 5,146 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 38 days, net +42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,093–5,153 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 01:005,146+16
11 Sept 2026, 17:575,130+2
7 Sept 2026, 11:195,128+1
3 Sept 2026, 00:525,127-2
31 Aug 2026, 00:575,129-10
27 Aug 2026, 14:335,139+3
24 Aug 2026, 21:135,136+1
21 Aug 2026, 04:425,135+11
18 Aug 2026, 05:525,124+14
15 Aug 2026, 01:085,110+10
8 Aug 2026, 19:035,100-4
7 Aug 2026, 19:325,104no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:245,104first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2,881 reactions across 12 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54182049716591998072,881100.0%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,881 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
55
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 12 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kana_exe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTCviews —124 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 5418204971659199807124

6 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC≈2,270 views491 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

Извините, хочу ненадолго закрыть комментарии. Очень сильно устала. Не столько от самого создания видео, сколько от постоянного потока обсуждений, споров и необходимости читать всё подряд. Поймала себя на том, что стала раздражительной и начинаю реагировать на вещи гораздо острее, чем обычно. Не хочу из-за собственного выгорания срываться на людях или превращать комментарии в место, которое меня только выматывает. Н

custom 5418204971659199807491

4 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC≈2,700 views236 reactions50 Starsread 12 August 2026

О ГОСПОДИ... Я совершенно запуталась во времени и перепутала часовые пояса при предзагрузке. Видео уже как два часа на канале, оказывается. Извините пожалуйста. Приятного просмотра тем, кто ещё не смотрел.

custom 5418204971659199807236

3 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC≈2,810 views268 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Видео выйдет завтра в 17:00 по МСК!

custom 5418204971659199807268

2 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC≈3,640 views296 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

До Снежной названия глав из тизера «Тейват», начиная с Сумеру, всегда совпадали с финальными главами заданий Архонтов региона. «Истина среди страниц Пураны», «Маскарад виновных», «Пылающая ода воскрешения» — всё это были именно заключительные акты своих сюжетных арок. Но у Снежной название из тизера досталось не финальной, а первой главе основного сюжета. Либо нас ждёт ситуация, похожая на Сумеру. Либо после Снежной

custom 5418204971659199807296

1 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC≈3,060 views120 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

У меня сейчас сразу три идеи для ролика, но сделать хочется что-то одно. Всё-таки релиз Снежной уже совсем скоро, и я даже не знаю, есть ли сейчас смысл строить теории.

  1. Теория о Третьем Сошедшем и Царице53%
  2. Теория о Койтар и Царице14%
  3. История Снежной32%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 5418204971659199807120

1 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC≈2,800 views242 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Причина, по которой в Снежной запрещена алхимия, может быть связана с прошлым Гипербореи и Каэнри'ах. Ведь и у тех, и у других опыт с алхимией оказался крайне печальным. На стриме версии 7.0 нам прямо сказали, что Царица не хочет, чтобы Снежная повторила судьбу этих двух цивилизаций. Возможно, именно поэтому алхимия и оказалась под запретом. Более того, зачастую алхимия была тесно связана с Бездной. При этом особенн

custom 5418204971659199807242

1 Aug 2026, 03:58 UTC≈2,690 views241 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Чем больше думаю над «Снежной принцессой и шестью карликами», тем сильнее ощущение, что это завуалированная история древней Снежной. • Снежная принцесса очень напоминает Царицу. Она правит северным народом, который удивительно похож на альвов: его жители отличаются бледной кожей, светлыми волосами и ярко-голубыми глазами. Если учитывать китайское название, то речь вообще идёт о Бледной принцессе — и это уже может бы

custom 5418204971659199807241

31 Jul 2026, 13:24 UTC≈3,240 views277 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, как ощущения после стрима? По всей видимости, за пропажей Паймон стоит Ронова, раз уж гг так отчаянно и бесстрашно решил сразиться с ней. Плюс разработчики сказали, что в сюжете будут задействованы все четыре Тени, а значит, Асмодей тоже наконец даст о себе знать. Отдельно хочется отметить модели персонажей — в целом они получились очень хорошими. Правда, лицо Одетты показалось мне каким-то странным, а про

custom 5418204971659199807277

25 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC≈4,400 views159 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📱 Видео вышло, приятных дискуссий в комментариях.

custom 5418204971659199807159

25 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC≈4,150 views214 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ролик в итоге вышел на 37 минут. Из-за этого решила даже не вставлять некоторые моменты, о которых изначально тоже хотела рассказать — иначе он стал бы ещё длиннее. Надо как-то приучить себя перестать выпускать такие огромные видео. Они у меня отнимают просто невероятное количество сил. Раньше я спокойно могла сделать два ролика по 15 минут и при этом чувствовала себя вполне нормально. А последние месяцы вообще с ума

custom 5418204971659199807214

25 Jul 2026, 06:57 UTC≈3,980 views213 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Видео выйдет сегодня в 17:00 по МСК 😮‍💨

custom 5418204971659199807213

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @kana_exe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTCFinal Results450 voters

У меня сейчас сразу три идеи для ролика, но сделать хочется что-то одно. Всё-таки релиз Снежной уже совсем скоро, и я даже не знаю, есть ли сейчас смысл строить теории.

  1. Теория о Третьем Сошедшем и Царице53%
  2. Теория о Койтар и Царице14%
  3. История Снежной32%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Muuurrchik
@muuurrchik · 47,835
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
Zenless Zone Zero | Muuurrchik
@zzzmuuurrchik · 21,713
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
Miron Min Max
@MironMinMax · 26,319
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кана печатает...” (@kana_exe), 5,146 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kana_exe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.