Маствотч про Найджела Ричардса — лучшего игрока всех времён и народов в Scrabble: https://youtu.be/zfH2Jwuf3sM?si=m48I8F_59uVsWV-a Скрэббл (также название переводят как "Эрудит" или "Крестостовица") — игра, в которой нужно определённым образом собирать слова из буквенных плиток, набирая очки. За рубежом очень популярная игра, по ней проводятся чемпионаты стран, мира и т.д. с денежными призами. В ней даже есть свои г…

Channel
Маствотч
@mustwatch
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
21,484subscribers
-225 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001063306562 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mustwatch |
| Description | Лучшие видео Интернета на русском и английском. Другие каналы Мастридера и его команды: @mustreads, @slangbang, @cultpop, @yourcareer, @yojob, @godnoplease По рекламе: @darina_ranadi Написать Мастридеру: [email protected] РКН: clck.ru/3G5tug |
| Created | 4 August 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mustwatch |
Topic
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:55 | 21,484 | -9 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:21 | 21,493 | -6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 21,499 | -7 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 21,506 | -9 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 21,515 | -18 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 21,533 | -19 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 21,552 | -20 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 21,572 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:54 | 21,578 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 21,582 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 21,594 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 21,598 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 21,600 | -9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 21,609 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 21,614 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 21,621 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 21,624 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 21,627 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 21,628 | -8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 21,636 | first reading |
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 9 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 16.7%
- avg views ÷ 21,484 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,600
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (9 October 2025 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 21,570 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 17:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈26
- Videos
- ≈10
- Links
- ≈1,040
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 54s
- Average length
- 57s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 7.69%
- 2 of 26 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 2
- posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 8,630
- over 2 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 7,350
- over 24 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjcAhLHE | 1 | 2 February 2026 | 2 February 2026 |
| 2Vtzqvdysay | 1 | 8 December 2025 | 8 December 2025 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2025 to 25 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Философский семиминутный маствотч про ИИ-апокалипсис и не только в экспериментальном формате: https://chiefofautism.com/ Почему это не ролик на ютюбе, а сайт? Потому что каждый зритель является частью перформанса. Например, на таймкоде 1:18 видео выдаст вам конкретные данные про ваше устройство, локацию и даже движения курсора (и это повлияет на вердикт сверхсильного ИИ в вашем отношении). По ощущениям, немного нед…
Мало кто знает, но у меня есть друзья из футбольного клуба ЦСКА. В прошлом — игроки сборной России. Которые, между прочим, читают интеллектуальные блоги и книги, опровергая стереотипы! Поэтому не мог пропустить документальную спортивную драму "Мы — ЦСКА!", созданную агентством и продакшеном HUMAN и самим клубом. Сериал показывает период, когда клуб покинул тренер Марко Николич. На его место приходит Фабио Челестини …
Отвлечёмся от экзистенциальных мотивов. Классная беседа Винса Гиллигана и трёх главных героев его сериалов (Breaking Bad, Better Call Saul и недавний Pluribus — "Из многих", который мне тоже очень нравится, жду второй сезон): https://youtu.be/_lPkj-BbS5I?si=o7SWojYrBBb-e-7R Особенно понравилось, как Брайан Крэнстон (ака Уолтер Уайт) красноречиво изложил, так сказать, творческий метод Винса, и показал, что общего у в…
Я не особо эмоционален, но во время просмотра этого видеоэссе пустил скупую слезу. Это шедевр: https://youtu.be/y894m7joEBc?si=yQT0Ul12-2CI4ztP Философская притча о природе сознания, смысле жизни, «философских зомби», контакте с инопланетным разумом в стиле «Соляриса» и многом другом. Невозможно это описать — лучше выделите полчаса и посмотрите. Не пожалеете.
Вчера я опубликовал на «Мастридах» подробности главной истории последних недель: взломов, осуществлённых роями ИИ-агентов от OpenAI (обязательно прочтите, если пропустили: https://t.me/mustreads/4743). Советую ещё пару маствотчей на тему: 1) пересказ расследования этой впечатляющей истории от Дваркеша Пателя (главного в мире подкастера по теме ИИ): https://youtu.be/u15N3l4RT80?si=4OPR2_FMdPY7dd-D 2) подкаст Пателя…
Один из лучших подкастов за долгое время! Рекомендую. Глубоко и дарково во всех смыслах этого слова: https://youtu.be/0eshWDuYYiY?si=NTn8FFifdYzA1OfS
Кажется, у меня появилось новое любимое шоу на Ютюбе. Венчурный фонд Founders Fund запустил свою версию игры в мафию! Играют такие люди, как Сэм Альтман (глава OpenAI), Брайан Джонсон (биохакер-миллиардер), Мокси Марлинспайк (основатель Signal), Палмер Лаки (основатель Oculus), Дилан Филд (основатель Figma), Тим Урбан (блогер, Wait But Why), Лив Боэри (лучшая покеристка в истории) и другие мощные ребята. Представьт…
Вышел новый классный подкаст с Андреем Володиным, одним из самых гениальных технологических визионеров, которых я знаю, и по совместительству моим другом и неоднократным гостем моих каналов. Советую всем посмотреть (ведущая — Катерина Рысь, которая недавно тоже ворвалась в подкастинг со своим проектом "Белая русская магия", и сделала это красиво): https://youtu.be/DVmDHHD3SII?si=Zw1aCRfRgSZIVOk4
Аманда Аскелл — штатный философ в компании Anthropic (ребята, которые сделали нейронку Claude, главные конкуренты OpenAI). Давно слышал, что Anthropic наняли себе штатного философа, и вот добрался до интервью с ней: https://youtu.be/I9aGC6Ui3eE?si=PUQuNWivPzmJjJTn Маствотч! Много интересных вопросов и ответов про принципы, закладываемые в системные промпты Клода (например, там есть западная философия, хотя нет вост…
Подробный видеоразбор вопроса о рисках сверхсильного ИИ (ролик на час): https://youtu.be/Qg5QXY_qZuI?si=yRee59DhGV436X88 Автор анализирует вопросы: (1) нужно ли ИИ иметь сознание, чтобы стремиться к достижению каких-либо целей? (2) что такое интеллект и вообще можно ли этот термин использовать применимо к нейронкам? (3) инстинкт самосохранения и стремление к власти и другим ресурсам — возможны ли они у ИИ? (4) каков…
Как вы знаете, я уже несколько лет живу в Казахстане и за это время научился удаленно организовывать любой процесс для друзей или семьи в России. Например, как-то раз я организовывал день рождения друга в Москве, где его должны были встречать живой музыкой. На площадке был рояль, но сильно расстроенный. Нужен был настройщик. Нашли его всего за 10 минут, он в тот же день приехал на место, поправил звук и назвал рояль…
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @mustwatch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Маствотч” (@mustwatch), 21,484 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mustwatch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.