Channel
@musictalkpodcast
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
862subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001408985284 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @musictalkpodcast |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/musictalkpodcast |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:00 | 862 | +1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 861 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 864 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 865 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 867 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:10 | 867 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 19 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
158 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 84 | 53.2% | |
| 💯 | 17 | 10.8% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 8.86% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 8.23% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 8.23% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 5.70% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 3.80% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 158 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 November 2025 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
На прошлой неделе была на концерте прекрасной Евы Власовой (5ый концерт в копилку). По обыкновению, была тронута ее искренностью и вдохновилась на рилс. Выкладывала без ожиданий. А он взял и залетел! :) Мой первый залетевший рилс 🥹 Рада, что именно такой - добрый, трогательный и вдохновляющий. Делюсь с вами 🤍
🥰5
Posted without readable text
Сегодня на консультации узнала, что меня им несколько раз посоветовал чат GPT. Источник трафика, о котором я и подумать не могла 😄 Даже приятно.
❤6🔥3
Лазарев нравится мне все больше 😌 Сначала история с тем, как он, после видеообращения школьников, приехал к ним сюрпризом на выпускной перед своим концертом. Теперь это видео со встречи с поклонницей, которая не успела купить билет на его концерт и Сергей это исправил. Как же я уважаю артистов, кто вне зависимости от своего статуса и количества аудитории, понимает ценность каждого человека. Не относится к аудитории,…
❤14
Video, posted without a caption
💯7❤5🔥5👏3
Нравятся фичи, которые ВК вводит для продажи билетов, переходов на канал из постов, полному видео из клипов, продаже мерча в карточке артиста итд Очень правильно и нужно - не забывайте использовать. Сейчас, кстати, при подписке на паблик человек автоматом подписывается и на канал, где порой трафик выше, чем в ленте. Вернуть бы к этому еще органических охватов, а! И нюансы в таргете починить.
👍3
И все-таки я ее услышала ❤️
❤4
Я работала с несколькими «фабрикантами» и на 200% согласна со словами Яны. «Фабрика» как и другие телевизионные проекты (или в наших реалиях - залетевший трек) невероятно мощный спусковой механизм для артиста, но то, как высоко и далеко артист полетит, в большей степени зависит от того, что он будет или не будет делать после. Если шанс выпадает, им надо уметь грамотно воспользоваться. И обладать высокой степенью тер…
👍8❤4💯3
Миллионный стриминг ≠ гарантия концертов. Решила сходить на концерт Nansi & Sidorov. Открываю оператора, продаж почти нет, а до концерта 10 дней. Первый тур, поздний анонс в соц.сетях и минимум наружной рекламы в городе тоже делают свое дело. И это при том, что в стриминге у ребят солидные 6млн, чартовые релизы и медийность. Собирать в регионах молодым артистам становится все сложнее. Особенно в жанре поп (если ты …
❤11👏5💯3
Интересная новость выше. Мое отношение к ИИ музыке на данный момент сформировалось такое: я не против этой формы самовыражения авторов / поэтов / менеджеров / продюсеров. Справедливости ради, порог входа в индустрию снижен давно и огромная часть выпускаемого материала «живыми» людьми далека от высокого искусства. Но учитывая, какие обороты набирает ИИ музыка, я бы вводила маркировку «ИИ-генерация» на каждый трек …
❤18👏3👍2😁2
🏆 Bandcamp отказался от ИИ-музыкантов Стриминговая платформа Bandcamp во вторник опубликовала политику контроля генеративной музыки. Компания заявила, что стремится защищать и поддерживать сообщество музыкантов и их слушателей. «Сегодня мы укрепляем нашу миссию, формулируя политику в отношении генеративного ИИ, чтобы музыканты могли продолжать создавать музыку, а поклонники были уверены, что музыка, которую они нах…
Что думаете про ИИ-артистов? Временный хайп или новая страница в музыке?
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @musictalkpodcast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сколько у вас слушателей в ВК в месяц?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 November 2025 to 24 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Шоу-бизнес по любви / Виктория” (@musictalkpodcast), 862 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/musictalkpodcast.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.