Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мариночка Владимировна держит за руку.

Channel

Мариночка Владимировна держит за руку.

@murmariparis

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

26,601subscribers

+562 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001413553691
TypeChannel
Username@murmariparis
DescriptionПсихоаналитический психотерапевт, клинический психолог, ассоциированный член МПА. О том, как отношения зарождаются, живут, ломаются и завершаются. Помогаю понять, что происходит именно с вашими. ПРОТОКОЛЫ ОТНОШЕНИЙ https://murmaripari.online/y/23e2daa
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/murmariparis

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

25,96926,60126,2857 August 2026 — 26,039 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,035 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,028 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,024 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,015 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,023 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,018 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,996 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,989 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,986 subscribers18 August 2026 — 25,981 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,969 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,970 subscribers21 August 2026 — 25,987 subscribers22 August 2026 — 26,033 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,057 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,088 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,137 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,140 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,158 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,161 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,193 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,211 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,201 subscribers2 September 2026 — 26,192 subscribers4 September 2026 — 26,249 subscribers6 September 2026 — 26,277 subscribers9 September 2026 — 26,260 subscribers12 September 2026 — 26,353 subscribers13 September 2026 — 26,376 subscribers15 September 2026 — 26,401 subscribers17 September 2026 — 26,422 subscribers19 September 2026 — 26,450 subscribers26 September 2026 — 26,601 subscribers7 August 202626 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net +562. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,874–26,696 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 18:0126,601+151
19 Sept 2026, 13:2226,450+28
17 Sept 2026, 01:5826,422+21
15 Sept 2026, 05:3926,401+25
13 Sept 2026, 17:3926,376+23
12 Sept 2026, 02:1726,353+93
9 Sept 2026, 17:3626,260-17
6 Sept 2026, 07:3826,277+28
4 Sept 2026, 04:0026,249+57
2 Sept 2026, 14:5526,192-9
1 Sept 2026, 10:5726,201-10
31 Aug 2026, 08:5626,211+18
30 Aug 2026, 09:1926,193+32
29 Aug 2026, 10:2526,161+3
28 Aug 2026, 08:3626,158+18
27 Aug 2026, 05:3326,140+3
26 Aug 2026, 07:2826,137+49
25 Aug 2026, 05:2726,088+31
24 Aug 2026, 07:0526,057+24
22 Aug 2026, 18:2726,033first reading

Engagement

65 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.6%
avg views ÷ 26,601 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,810
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 65 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026
Posts held65 (27 July 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Views total61,760
Reactions total2,216
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Oct 2026, 03:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
905
Videos
572
Links
474

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
30m 42s
Average length
3m 25s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

10,890 reactions across 63 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7,59769.8%
🔥1,45213.3%
❤‍🔥6315.79%
👍3903.58%
🤣2412.21%
👏1481.36%
🥰1231.13%
😢610.56%
🐳530.487%
😁460.422%
🤪370.34%
🤝320.294%
💋310.285%
😍270.248%
🤩130.119%
👻80.073%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,890 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 64 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @murmariparis. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 65 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 1 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Oct 2026, 14:15 UTC≈1,740 views159 reactionsread 3 October 2026
Video

Очень часто где-то в глубине души мы понимаем, что наши отношения завершились. И несмотря на это понимание, рядом живёт большой страх завершить их по-настоящему. У каждого своя причина, и каждая причина имеет право на жизнь. Однако подумайте, насколько это энергозатратно — изо дня в день пытаться реанимировать отношения, которые давно не подают признаков жизни, и тратить свою энергию, вместо того чтобы жить и исследо…

❤111❤‍🔥34👏12👍1🔥1

29 Sept 2026, 16:07 UTC≈2,320 views215 reactionsread 3 October 2026
Video

Друзья, сегодня образовываемся об картину «Утопленница» Василия Григорьевича Перова. Пока идем на поводу у алгоритмов и все же делаем х2, но для любителей как есть, в натуральном формате выложу в ТГ «Мариночка Владимировна держит за руку» Мне нравится, что эта спонтанная рубрика нашла столько отклика в ваших сердцах. Знаете, я вообще решила, что в век искусственного интеллекта и одинаковых текстов, я останусь диноза…

🔥133❤68🐳11🥰3

25 Sept 2026, 21:08 UTC≈3,390 views194 reactionsread 3 October 2026
Video

А мы продолжаем продолжать и неспешно изучаем себя и отношения через великие произведения.

❤145🔥28❤‍🔥12😍7🤪2

23 Sept 2026, 17:40 UTC≈3,830 views168 reactionsread 3 October 2026
Video

«Да я тебя знаю. Всё с тобой понятно». В отношениях, особенно с близкими людьми, мы часто уверены, что точно про них всё знаем. Знаем, что муж скажет в ответ на нашу просьбу. Знаем о чём мечтает дочь. Почему сын молчит. Мы ещё не спросили, а ответ уже готов. Особенно годам к сорока, когда за плечами столько совместной жизни: «Ну что я, своего мужа не знаю? Своего ребёнка не понимаю?» И это одно из самых больших …

❤120❤‍🔥27👍16🤪3🔥2

22 Sept 2026, 08:47 UTC≈3,270 views53 reactionsread 3 October 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

❤47🔥6

21 Sept 2026, 14:54 UTC≈3,400 views161 reactionsread 3 October 2026
Photo

Неравный брак. Чем он опасен? Эта картина Василия Пукирева с детства завораживала меня. В доме моей бабушки висела репродукция, и я всё думала: что же произошло в жизни этой девушки, что она выходит замуж за такого старика? Можно сказать: «Раньше так было». Но мне всегда хотелось всмотреться в то, как художник рассказывает эту историю. Пукирев начинал с обучения у иконописца, позднее знакомился с европейской живопис…

❤121❤‍🔥25👍9🔥6

21 Sept 2026, 11:28 UTC≈3,330 views78 reactionsread 3 October 2026

Пост для моих любимых коллег психологов. Друзья, не пропустите, я заклинаю вас обязательно пойти на это обучение, потому что этот курс даст вам больше чем скучные лекции в институте. Курс проводит уважаемый мной преподаватель от Бога, психолог, супервизор Елена Бочкарева. 17 октября начнется специализация «Терапия отношениями: от теории привязанности к диалогу и полевой парадигме». И если вы психолог, особенно нач…

❤78

20 Sept 2026, 19:37 UTC≈3,420 views349 reactions1 Starread 3 October 2026
Photo

Я не знаю чем порно ботам интересен этот канал, но на всякий случай вот. Ангела Хранителя всем ко сну.

❤218🤣109🔥22

20 Sept 2026, 15:09 UTC≈3,390 views161 reactionsread 3 October 2026

Друзья, и еще одно важное объявление. Я сейчас постепенно буду полностью уходить внутрь клуба со всеми лекциями, активностями, эфирами, zoom встречами - мне интересно создать сильное комьюнити и школу отношений. Это долгий путь, он потребует умения держать фокус и не распаляться, но мне безумно интересно его пройти вместе с вами. Если вы когда-то были внутри клуба и у вас есть желание под этим постом поделиться, ч…

❤150👍11

20 Sept 2026, 15:05 UTC≈2,920 views56 reactionsread 3 October 2026

В этой истории, по моим ощущениям истощение связано не столько с разногласиями, сколько с необходимостью каждый раз объяснять, почему с вашими переживаниями нужно считаться. Вы приходите в разговор с болью, а оказываетесь в споре, где приходится ещё и доказывать, что у вас есть основания её чувствовать. И далее, классика о которой я бесконечно говорю в лекциях внутри клуба, женщина начинает сомневаться: «Может быть,…

❤52👍3🔥1

20 Sept 2026, 15:02 UTC≈2,480 views40 reactionsread 3 October 2026

Мариночка, добрый вечер! Я не с вопросом идти или не идти, точно иду, все ваши продукты мне интересны и познавательны.💛 Но хотелось бы услышать ваше мнение, я в отношениях, он зовет замуж, а я четко понимаю, что есть чувства, но для отношений/семьи этого мало, очень важна зрелость, которой мне в нем не хватает. Раньше аккуратно подбирая слова подсвечивала ему, сейчас громко и прямо говорю чего я хочу в отношениях и ч…

❤39👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @murmariparis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@murmariparis edited 11 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
22 August 2026
Most recent edit
3 September 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Sept 2026, 10:56 UTCAnonymous Poll216 voters

Выберите картинку, на которую больше всего похожа ваша семья

  1. 1 — Постоянно ссоримся по одному сценарию30%
  2. 2 — Жду, что он сам поймёт, чего я хочу9%
  3. 3 — Устала всё тащить, но без меня всё развалится19%
  4. 4 — Не могу сказать ему «нет» без чувства вины13%
  5. 5 — Не понимаю: все плохо или я преувеличиваю42%
  6. 6 — Вроде все хорошо, но счастливой себя не чувствую34%

The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTCAnonymous Poll390 voters

Если вам плохо в отношениях, какой выход вам кажется наиболее логичным?

  1. Завершить отношения48%
  2. Еще раз поговорить52%
  3. Ваш вариант в комментариях3%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 1 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Мария Бразговская
@MBrazgovskaia · 56,245
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мариночка Владимировна держит за руку.” (@murmariparis), 26,601 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/murmariparis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.