🤖 迈克尔·塞勒 指出, 什么 Chat GPT 帮助 Strategy 创建了一种新的金融工具并筹集了约 150 亿美元用于购买比特币。 他对AI时代的主要建议是不要在日常工作中与机器人竞争,而是利用它们来创造以前不存在的产品和解决方案。

Channel
PayNe⚡️资源分享频道
@mumushare6
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
141subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002153422323 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mumushare6 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mumushare6 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 141 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 139 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 139 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:41 | 140 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.7%
- avg views ÷ 141 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 16.4
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (7 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 230 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 22:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3m 41s
- Average length
- 44s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
💎 各国央行再次大举购买黄金第二季度,他们增加了 289 吨储量,这是自 2024 年底以来的最高水平。 波兰成为主要买家 🇵🇱
☠️ 由于 Coldcard 钱包漏洞, 被绑架 BTC 来自 500 个地址的 38,000,000 美元。
🗽 美国上市公司持有 1,240,000 BTC - 全球近 93% 的企业比特币储备。 去年他们又购买了 510,000 套 BTC - 是矿工同期开采量的三倍多。
💵 正好16年前 中本聪 写了 在 Bitcoin Talk 论坛上,有一个短语已经成为一种邪教: 如果你不相信我或者不明白,我没有时间说服你,对不起。
🪙 币安 指出, 什么 年轻人已经成为股票和其他传统资产交易的主要受众 - 在 Z世代 跌倒之前 这些产品的 45% 用户。
加密货币交易所的运作机制一目了然 😁
🪒 特朗普第二任期已满两年 赚到的 更多的, 比过去60年,尽管他拒绝了总统的薪水。 主要来源是地穴、个人粪便, Trump Media 并以他的名义出售许可证。
🇷🇺 俄罗斯新晋百万富翁人数进入前十名。去年,该国出现了 2.2 万人。尽管人口相差十倍,但这个数字比中国还要多。
🤖 下塔吉尔数学家 问 GPT-5.6“取得突破”——与人工智能一起,他反驳了大约 30 年来一直被认为正确的假设。 他只是让模型继续证明,然后去喝咖啡,而她则花了 80 分钟收集论据。
美国比特币持有量已超过黄金,4960万美国人持有比特币 BTC River 表示,相比之下,拥有黄金的人数为 2880 万人。
📊 过去 60 天,比特币鲸鱼已累计 66,700 BTC,而中型持有者售出 77,800 BTC。 大型参与者继续在下跌中收集代币,从退出市场的人那里获取供应。
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @mumushare6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,460,487 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PayNe⚡️资源分享频道” (@mumushare6), 141 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mumushare6.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.