Ch ini gabakal gua hapus krn menurut gua bukti2 yg gua kasih disini jg sgt makesense dan akurat. Anon msh buka tapi ga gua bales, kecuali ngasih bukti

Channel
Mulut Nasional
@mulutnasional
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
55subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003717618274 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mulutnasional |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mulutnasional |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 55 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 56 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 776.5%
- avg views ÷ 55 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 427
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 August 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,542 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 23:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Disini gw cmn berharap kalian jgn bela mana2 jir, trs disini gua jg nunjukkin ini semua udh direncanain wkwkwk, dan dengan adanya ch ini, gua harap bukti yg berat sebelah itu dh kejawab krn saking banyaknya yg blg masalahnya berat sebelah. Dan bnyk yg bilang kalo pihak seke buat klarif terlalu panjang, bahasanya susah dipahami dll, kalo kalian pinter literasi dan cari gagasan utama dari klarif itu pasti kalian ngerti…
Gua gak ada blg kalian ngerusuhin sd sampe cd juga, https://t.me/mulutnasional/497 disini gw jg blg kalo gada sangkut pautnya ama pihak hk. https://t.me/mulutnasional/492 disini jg gw fw jawaban dari anon, dan buat sender yg bilang kalo sd cd karena perusuh dr hk tetep gua post dan ga gua hapus, krn siapa tau kalian yg berpikiran sama kaya sender itu, dah ada jawabannya dibawahnya. Kalo pihak sd itu cd gada sangkut p…
Dan buat kalian memb seke lama, dan sering ngetem di ske harusnya tau kalo mereka berdua memang sama2 salah, yg baru jgn asal kehasut wkwk
Ngapain ngebersihin, wong dia aja dah ga ngurusin rp makanya lrp kan, disini gw up masalah yg dipaksa ketutup aja sm pihak luar supaya ga ketauan. Tp ujung2nya gw buka masalahnya, karena pada blg maslaahnya berat sebelah
Ini lu mau ngebersihin nama si kiehl atau seke? Atau gimana lagi maksud lu? Misal si hakan juga lrp, apa lu bakal tetep bikin ch beginian buat spill apa yang menurut lu bener dan salah?
Gua jawabin dn jelasin jg sambil balesin anon waktu itu, ya jawabannya ada di saat gw blsin anon
Kalo pihak sana babibubebo, buktinya ada disini, yg penting literasi. Lagian klarif kok stgh2, knp ga semua poin lu bahas???
Habis ini bbc anon ga gua fw lagi ye krn kalian muter2 mulu pertanyaannya
Lah ya kan gw blg dia menimbulkan masalah, mereka ber2 sm aja. Trs soal usn kan dia jelasin kenapa mention usn dia kena mute, makanya literasi. Soal saran tuh didenger, dieval jg sm mereka. Makanya wkt itu sempet ada bbrp hal yg dibatalin di seke, itu semua atas dasar permintaan member sendiri
https://t.me/mulutnasional/583 si Ash dengan kelakuan begitu lu kira ga menimbulkan masalah juga kah? Entah itu pribadi ke dia atau dari yang lain. Jadi owner aja sok bener, segala mention usn aja ke mute, klarif ngalor ngidul, bikin gc kritik tapi anti kritik, open saran tapi ga didenger, kekeh sama keinginan dia sendiri.
Nih bahkan ada salah 1 adm yang muak sm dia wkwk
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mulutnasional. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 793,398 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mulut Nasional” (@mulutnasional), 55 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mulutnasional.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.