Channel
@multicards_eng
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
60subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001844384255 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @multicards_eng |
| Description | 💳 Your trusted partner for virtual cards! Sign up 👉 https://tinyurl.com/5n7mh8sr Over 100 BINs in 5 GEOs: US 🇺🇸 | EST 🇪🇪 | UK 🇬🇧 | HK 🇭🇰 | BE 🇧🇪 Support Team @Multicards_Support Managers: @ayaz_multicards @yulian_multicards |
| Created | 4 October 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/multicards_eng |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 60 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 60 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 61 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 4 October 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (4 October 2022 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 460 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
13 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 46.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 30.8% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 23.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 4 October 2022 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @multicards_eng. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 October 2022 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Tired of running traffic on Facebook? Maybe it's time to test new traffic sources If you're working with gambling, betting, dating/adult, VPN, or utilities, check out our partner. MyBid is a multi-format ad network delivering 6+ billion daily impressions across 200+ GEOs. Why media buyers choose MyBid: 📣 6 ad formats: Push, Popunder, In-Page, Banner, and Video. ⚡️ High traffic volumes for fast campaign scaling. 📈 …
Posted without readable text
🔥3❤🔥1
⚡️ Multicards.io is heading to Budapest! Affiliate World Europe 2026, one of the biggest conferences in the industry, kicks off tomorrow. If you're attending the event too and would like to discuss potential cooperation, explore new opportunities, or simply meet our team, we'd be happy to connect! 📅 You can book a meeting with Gregory, our CPO, via Telegram. See you in Budapest! 🚀
🔐 Why is it important to enable Two-Factor Authentication (2FA)? Your password is the first line of defense for your account. However, even the strongest password can end up in the wrong hands due to data breaches, phishing attacks, or malware. Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) adds an extra layer of security. In Multicards, you can enable an additional verification step when signing in. What are the benefits? 🩷 Pr…
❤2
📱 TikTok in 2026 With the constant issues caused by our beloved Mark Zuckerberg, many teams have started shifting to alternative traffic sources to avoid losing profits and traffic volume. That’s why we decided to take a closer look at TikTok — its structure and placements. Inside TikTok, you'll find everything media buyers are already familiar with: ✅ Business Center for managing assets and teams ✅ Pixel and Even…
💎 Latest BIN update ✨ Meet 🇺🇸 Emerald (USD)! Terms for 🇺🇸 Emerald (USD): 💋 $2 per card issuance 💋 2% transaction fee 💋 3% additional fee for international transactions 💋$0.35 per declined transaction You can always contact us with any questions regarding our service. Contacts: 💎Account Manager Julian 💎Account Manager Ayyaz 💎Support team 💳 Sign up to get more BINs
⚡️Today, together with our partners 3SNET, we’re breaking down one of the most underrated GEOs in betting — Egypt 🇪🇬 ➡️A market with cheap traffic, low competition, and a massive audience — but with its own nuances: from brand trust to creative angles and prime-time behavior. ‼️If you’re considering entering Tier-3 markets or looking for new profitable setups, this material is definitely worth saving.
Since 2016, Proxys.io has become one of the most reliable proxy services for media buyers. While many services have come and gone, these guys have kept delivering stable proxies consistently. Advantages: ✅ 240+ countries — covers virtually any GEO you’re running. Rumor has it they’re eyeing the Moon next once they finish Earth. ⚡️ Instant automatic provisioning — no waiting for managers or unnecessary back-and-fo…
‼️Dear partners ‼️ The support team account is temporarily unavailable. If you have any questions, suggestions, or need assistance, please contact our account managers: 📱 @yulian_multicards 📱 @ayaz_multicards 📱 @multicards_support1 Stay in touch, and thank you for your understanding 💜
❤1
✨ Latest BIN update ✨ Meet 🇺🇸 Aphrodite (USD)! Terms for 🇺🇸 Aphrodite (USD): 💋 $2 per card issuance 💋 3% transaction fee 💋 3% additional fee for international transactions ⚠️ Please note that the amount of declined transactions must not exceed 15% of the total transaction volume. You can always contact us with any questions regarding our service. Contacts: 💎 Account Manager Julian 💎 Account Manager Ayyaz 💳 Sig…
❤2
Dear partners, Our support team has been temporarily moved to a new account: @Multicards_welcome You can also reach out directly to our account managers: 📱 @yulian_multicards 📱 @ayaz_multicards Stay in touch, and thank you for your understanding 💜
🥂 Let’s raise a glass to the new USD BIN 🇺🇸 Dionysus (USD)! Terms for 🇺🇸 Dionysus (USD): 💋 $3 per card issuance 💋 2% transaction fee 💋 3% additional fee for international transactions ⚠️ Please note that the amount of declined transactions must not exceed 15% of the total transaction volume. You can always contact us with any questions regarding our service. Contacts: 💎 Account Manager Julian 💎 Account Manager A…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @multicards_eng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 149,262 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Multicards.io | Virtual cards for advertising” (@multicards_eng), 60 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/multicards_eng.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.