Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Being Mukesh

@mukesh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,027subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001138338706
TypeChannel
Username@mukesh
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 31 August 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mukesh

Growth

1,0261,0281,0277 August 2026 — 1,028 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,028 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,026 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,027 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,026–1,028 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:461,027+1
10 Aug 2026, 03:321,026-2
7 Aug 2026, 04:161,028no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:081,028first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

598 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍41669.6%
👎11018.4%
🤔528.70%
😴203.34%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 598reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2024 to 22 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 May 2026, 18:43 UTC≈1,590 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ok doc 🤣🤣

👍3🤔1

Signed 𝑀𝑢𝑘𝑒𝑠ℎ

7 Mar 2026, 12:04 UTC≈3,060 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

@Jokes

👍7🤔2👎1

Signed 𝑀𝑢𝑘𝑒𝑠ℎ

19 Nov 2025, 16:20 UTC≈5,530 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍28👎6🤔2

Signed 𝑀𝑢𝑘𝑒𝑠ℎ

31 Oct 2025, 04:15 UTC≈5,760 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

@Jokes True?

👍17👎2

Signed 𝑀𝑢𝑘𝑒𝑠ℎ

21 Sept 2025, 14:53 UTC≈6,210 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍23🤔3😴3

Signed 𝑀𝑢𝑘𝑒𝑠ℎ

25 Jul 2025, 01:28 UTC≈6,780 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Cowards, can't be one on one, they have to have their gang to do things.

👍22👎3😴1

Signed 𝑀𝑢𝑘𝑒𝑠ℎ

24 Jun 2025, 07:24 UTC≈7,180 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

99% people are into bitcoin as they wants to make profit from it.

👎23👍6🤔6

Signed 𝑀𝑢𝑘𝑒𝑠ℎ

7 May 2025, 05:22 UTC≈7,990 views70 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Only Poor Die in Wars.

👎34👍32😴4

Signed 𝑀𝑢𝑘𝑒𝑠ℎ

16 Mar 2025, 04:12 UTC≈9,220 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

You can not blame others for your problems. 😐

👍27👎4😴4

Signed 𝑀𝑢𝑘𝑒𝑠ℎ

11 Feb 2025, 12:28 UTC≈10,100 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍26👎6😴5🤔2

Signed 𝑀𝑢𝑘𝑒𝑠ℎ

27 Jan 2025, 05:39 UTC≈9,020 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍18🤔10👎3

Signed 𝑀𝑢𝑘𝑒𝑠ℎ

18 Jan 2025, 07:50 UTC≈8,380 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Half of the people are stupid then Average. 🤷🏻‍♂

🤔12👍6👎3

Signed 𝑀𝑢𝑘𝑒𝑠ℎ

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mukesh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Being Mukesh” (@mukesh), 1,027 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mukesh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.