Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

๐Œ๐”๐‡๐“๐„๐’๐’๐‹๐Ž๐•๐„๐Ÿ’˜

@muhtesslove

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

298subscribers

+23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002783687842
TypeChannel
Username@muhtesslove
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/muhtesslove

Growth

275298286.56 August 2026 โ€” 275 subscribers6 August 2026 โ€” 275 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 279 subscribers15 August 2026 โ€” 298 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 272โ€“301 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 03:12298+19
7 Aug 2026, 20:21279+4
6 Aug 2026, 23:32275no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:48275first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
4.42%
avg views รท 298 subscribers
Avg views / post
13.2
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
โ€”
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held12 (6 August 2026 โ€“ 6 August 2026)
Views total145
Reactions totalโ€”
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 23:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC10 viewsread 6 August 2026

ะ’ ัะผั‹ัะปะต? ะฏ ะฑัƒะดัƒ

Signed ๐’œ๐‘™๐‘’๐‘ฆ๐‘š๐‘š๐Ÿธ

6 Aug 2026, 19:44 UTC17 viewsread 6 August 2026

ะฑะพะปัŒัˆะต ะฝะธะบั‚ะพ ะฝะต ะฑัƒะดะตั‚ ัƒั‡ะฐัั‚ะฒะพะฒะฐั‚ัŒ?(ั‚ะพะณะดะฐ ะฝะฐะฒะตั€ะฝะพ ะฟั€ะธะดั‘ั‚ัั ะพั‚ะผะตะฝะธั‚ัŒ ะฐััะพั†ะธะฐั†ะธัŽ, ั‚.ะบ. ะผะฐะปะพ ะปัŽะดะตะน)

Signed ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐Ÿ’˜

6 Aug 2026, 19:42 UTC17 viewsread 6 August 2026

40 ยซ๐Ÿ’…ยป ะดะพ ัƒั‚ั€ะฐ?

Signed ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐Ÿ’˜

6 Aug 2026, 19:42 UTCviews โ€”

๐Œ๐”๐‡๐“๐„๐’๐’๐‹๐Ž๐•๐„๐Ÿ’˜ pinned ยซั€ะตะฑัั‚ะฐ, ัะผะพั‚ั€ะธะผ ะฒัะต ะพะฟ!ยป

6 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC17 viewsread 6 August 2026

ั€ะตะฑัั‚ะฐ, ัะผะพั‚ั€ะธะผ ะฒัะต ะพะฟ!

Signed ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐Ÿ’˜

6 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC11 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @gartopovstala_flamePhoto

โ€” ะขะธ ะณะฐั€ะฝะตะฝัŒะบะธะน, ะดั–ะฒั‡ะฐั‚ะฐ ะฒะธะบะพะปัŽะฒะฐั‚ะธะผัƒั‚ัŒ ะพะดะฝะฐ ะพะดะฝั–ะน ะพั‡ั–, ั‰ะพะฑ ะฟะตั€ะตัะฟะฐั‚ะธ ะท ั‚ะพะฑะพัŽ. ะฏ ะผะพะถัƒ ะฝะฐะฒั‡ะธั‚ะธ ั‚ะตะฑะต ั†ัŒะพะณะพ. โ€” ะฏ ะทะฝะฐัŽ, ัะบ ั†ะต ั€ะพะฑะธั‚ัŒัั. ๐— ๐—ข๐— ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง ยซ ะั–ั‡ะพะณะพ ั‚ะธ ะฝะต ะทะฝะฐั”ัˆ, ะ”ะถะพะฝะต ะกะฝะพัƒ ยป โžซ ะ†ะณั€ะธั‚ั‚ { #ะ†ะณั€ะธั‚ั‚ #ะ”ะถะพะฝะกะฝะพัƒ #ะ“ั€ะฐะŸั€ะตัั‚ะพะปั–ะฒ } ๐–ฅธ Take with mark tt: anna_gartopovstala

Signed ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐Ÿ’˜

6 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC13 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @powelloxscenesVideo

stickers w caroline daniels #carolinedaniels #stickers โ€” 80pcs;1:1 ๐ŸŒจ๏ธ๐ŸŒจ๏ธ๐ŸŒจ๏ธ๐ŸŒจ๏ธ๐ŸŒจ๏ธ๐ŸŒจ๏ธ๐ŸŒจ๏ธ๐ŸŒจ๏ธ๐ŸŒจ๏ธ๐ŸŒจ๏ธ ะตัะปะธ ะฑะตั€ะตั‚ะต ยซ+ยป ะฒ ะบะพะผะผั‹

Signed ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐Ÿ’˜

6 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC19 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @syyylvainePhoto

๐Ÿคฉ โœ๏ธ ะกะพั„ะธ ะขัั‚ั‡ะตั€ โ€“ 70 ัˆั‚ัƒะบ โ€“ ะฝะฐั€ะตะทะบะธ {16:9} ะฒะทัะปะธ? ะพั‚ะผะตั‚ัŒั‚ะต ะผะพะน ะบะฐะฝะฐะปะฐ

Signed ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐Ÿ’˜

6 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC8 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @vierturesPhoto

ะ‘ะธะปะปะธ ะะนะปะธัˆ-ัะตะปะตะฑั€ะธั‚ะธ๐ŸŒŸ ๐Ÿ“ค 35 ัˆั‚ัƒะบ ั†ะฒ @viertures

Signed ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐Ÿ’˜

6 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC10 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @helpfrlewriPhoto

โญโญโญโญโญโญโญโญ ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ โ€” Follow your heart ๐Ÿ–ค

Signed ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐Ÿ’˜

6 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC13 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @charxalPhoto

ะะพะฒั‹ะน ะฟะพัั‚ ะฒ ัะฟะฐะผ-ะฐะบะบะฐัƒะฝั‚ะต ะงะฐั€ะปะธ ั ะฒั‹ัั‚ัƒะฟะปะตะฝะธั BBC. ๐Ÿ”Ž tags: #instagram #post #spam update fm: @charxal

Signed ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐Ÿ’˜

6 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC10 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @wisternisPhoto

โ€“ ั…ะพัƒะฟ ะธ ะปะธะทะทะธ โ‹† ะฝะฐัะปะตะดะธะต๐Ÿฅน โ€“ ะฝะฐั€ะตะทะบะธ [94 ;; 16:9] โ€ ะฒะทัะปะธ? ะพั‚ะผะตั‚ัŒั‚ะต tt: iconxvd & ะฝะฐะฟะธัˆะธั‚ะต ยซ+ยป ะฒ ะบะพะผะผ.โ™ก

Signed ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐Ÿ’˜

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @muhtesslove. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 155,882 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐Œ๐”๐‡๐“๐„๐’๐’๐‹๐Ž๐•๐„๐Ÿ’˜โ€ (@muhtesslove), 298 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/muhtesslove.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.